Most people only remember Larry Holmes as the washed up 38 year old Tyson beat. In his prime, Larry was a killer and would absolutely annihilate every HW today, bar NONE. If people are hailing Usyk as a genius (he is), then what's Larry Holmes with that pinpoint laser jab of his and footwork? He would positively cut up every fighter today with their boring static, non-fluid style and stop most, if not, all of of them.
People overrate the past and underrate the present in all subjective sports like boxing or basketball. Holmes could be a champion in this era but he could also be beaten like any other heavyweight.
Yep. Another "the grass was greener..." crap :confused:
People overrate the past and underrate the present in all subjective sports like boxing or basketball. Holmes could be a champion in this era but he could also be beaten like any other heavyweight.
The main reason i think Holmes and Ali wouldn't succeed in the post lennox era, especially with Fury around, is due to their styles, they were outboxers and like to stay out of range and use their longer reaches, good luck doing that to someone who can hit you from the other side of the ring.
We cant just compare him to Usyk who fights in a completely different style and say since usyk done so will holmes.
They'd succumb to the 1 2 hold like many other men their size.
that "guy moving up" you're referring to is Michael Spinks, who without a doubt fuks AJ's world all the way up as well. And Holmes won that 2nd fight. First one is debatable.
you got spinks beating Fury?
I could see that, guy could box his ass off in his prime, but he himself was beat by a guy moving up twice so that has to be looked at as well
that "guy moving up" you're referring to is Michael Spinks, who without a doubt fuks AJ's world all the way up as well. And Holmes won that 2nd fight. First one is debatable.