Roy Jones Calls Bivol Cherry Pick

1998 -2003...RJJ consisted entirely on cherries :lol1:

I know Nell was betting favourite. But I thought bivol would win so Nel o was my underdog. point being bivol was one of the stronger underdogs so can't be deemed cherry pick, otherwise it starts getting silly You have mastered the art of trolling.

Yes bivil was underdog but had a good chance to win.. Maybe a better chance than anyone at 168. So wasn't a cherrypick Bivol was the underdog, that I known the other part: cry me a river and F Clenelo.

What do you mean Bivol wasn't the underdog? LOL. That is what everyone said. Just a few of us had him winning. If there is a rematch, I have Bivol KO-ing Clenelo. Yes bivil was underdog but had a good chance to win.. Maybe a better chance than anyone at 168. So wasn't a cherrypick

I honestly would have put money on Bivol but, as I feared, Bivol needed to dominate to even get a squeaky thin decision. I think the odds reflected this.

Nelo was underdog, its not a cherry pick. Cherry picks are when you pick weak underdogs. Picking underdogs is ok, but try pick the stronger underdog. Bivol would be a stronger underdog than a charlo, or andrade. Even beterbiev isnt a stronger opponent than Bivol. Althought beterbiev might be favourite against Nelo. What do you mean Bivol wasn't the underdog? LOL. That is what everyone said. Just a few of us had him winning. If there is a rematch, I have Bivol KO-ing Clenelo.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69VT-TtpZWg Roy doesn't know WTF he's taking about. I think his brain has been hijacked by LDBC narratives. It's so obvious that I don't know how to explain it any simpler. Bivol was the easiest entry point for Canelo to attempt his undisputed run at 175 pounds. He was not a cherry pick. He was what was deemed the "weakest link" in a stacked division because Bivol hadn't KO'd someone in several fights. Canelo assumed that without crazy KO power like Beterbiev, he could use Bivol to acclimate before fighting the winner of Beterbiev vs Smith. He obviously underestimated Bivol to a certain extent, but no more than any boxer does to any opponent. Bivol hits harder than Canelo imagined, as we can see from his face the first time Bivol let go of a combo. He also thought he'd be more effective at hitting Bivol with everything he has, but Bivol's back-stepping took a lot of the steam off of Canelo's punches. It is what it is, but what it is not is a cherry pick. It was an earnest attempt by Canelo to become undisputed at a different weight class. What did Benavidez have to offer Canelo as far as legacy? Nothing. What did Charlo have to off as far as legacy? Nothing. What did Errol have to off Canelo as far as legacy? Nothing but a name, and that name isn't worth much when that name has to jump several weight classes and be the small guy. What's wrong with Roy? He's smarter than this.

Who cares what you personally thought. Overall Bivol was a heavy underdog that is fact. Being a cherry pick does not mean you are a bum, it just means your the easiest option. Jones is right. bivil is easiest option? As long as you don't have to fight him

Canelo was a 5-1 favorite. I still couldn't believe that Nelo was that much of a favorite, I told my father in law that Bivol was very good and to me I thought he would be too much for Canelo

Nelo was underdog, its not a cherry pick. Cherry picks are when you pick weak underdogs. Picking underdogs is ok, but try pick the stronger underdog. Bivol would be a stronger underdog than a charlo, or andrade. Even beterbiev isnt a stronger opponent than Bivol. Althought beterbiev might be favourite against Nelo. :haha: He was the favorite, foo

- - The betting spread was close with Canelo the fav. U stoooopid or just a congenital liar? How is 5-1 dog, close?

Who cares what you personally thought. Overall Bivol was a heavy underdog that is fact. Being a cherry pick does not mean you are a bum, it just means your the easiest option. Jones is right. - - The betting spread was close with Canelo the fav. U stoooopid or just a congenital liar?

I know Nell was betting favourite. But I thought bivol would win so Nel o was my underdog. point being bivol was one of the stronger underdogs so can't be deemed cherry pick, otherwise it starts getting silly Who cares what you personally thought. Overall Bivol was a heavy underdog that is fact. Being a cherry pick does not mean you are a bum, it just means your the easiest option. Jones is right.

Roy Jones Jnr is one of those guys you had to admire as a fighter but just can't take seriously as a pundit. Like Froch and Haye.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69VT-TtpZWg - - Roy shoulda retired wif brains intact a decade before he did and so should U low testa males and shemales too.

It was a very respectable opponent. My guess is Canelo’s team planned on Canelo to be able to remain competitive enough to get an easy decision. Where it went wrong for them was that Canelo got so dominated that the judges had no choice but to give it to Bivol, albeit as narrowly as possible. I can get with that. Bivol's win came to within a hair's breadth of a beat down, yet the corrupt judges made it a 2 point win.

Nelo was underdog, its not a cherry pick. Cherry picks are when you pick weak underdogs. Picking underdogs is ok, but try pick the stronger underdog. Bivol would be a stronger underdog than a charlo, or andrade. Even beterbiev isnt a stronger opponent than Bivol. Althought beterbiev might be favourite against Nelo. If Nelo was underdog I wouldn't have won $700 on a $100 bet.

Canelo was a 5-1 favorite. I know Nell was betting favourite. But I thought bivol would win so Nel o was my underdog. point being bivol was one of the stronger underdogs so can't be deemed cherry pick, otherwise it starts getting silly

Roy has lost the plot.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69VT-TtpZWg I don’t think people know what a cherry pick is. First, you have to win easy. If you loose but then rematch and win. It’s still a cherry pick. If you get your a$$$$ handed to you. That’s not a cherry pick. That’s an a$$$ whippin.