Is 1.5 Million viewers worldwide for Taylor-Serrano a good number?

Worldwide? F^ck No! Then again it is DAZN, not many people actually have DAZN let's be honest here so for DAZN that is a great number I'm sure

We knew which networks they were both on beforehand right? Wasn't Hearn's reasoning for it being so much bigger is that the main steam media has picked it up? So I'm unsure why that matters. All i know is that comparing network figures like that is very hard, they would both have to be on the same network to make a true comparison but comparing 1.5 mil to other fights on dazn with big names seems to hold up very well & bigger numbers than a lot of mens fights actually, as for the espn figures 1.3 sounds pretty good too but u would have to compare that to recent espn fights of other fighters to get a true comparison of even that on the same network, maybe hearn has those figures to hand

Smells like redfoxx in here Listen PeepeePoopooMan... If anyone has anything negative to say about the fine women who lace em up... I would implore them to try to watch a women's professional basketball game...I guarantee you they will come out of that room shaking, crying and proclaiming the greatness of women's combatives!:lol1:

Why would you say it's not? How much more would would Valdez vs Stevenson have done outside the US? My guess is not a lot. You are also comparing ESPN to DAZN, so i think its a big number all things considered. When did he make any statement judging the number? Did I miss something?

Or not? I've never seen the numbers be put into a "World Wide" category like DAZN/Eddie Hearn have done with Taylor-Serrano. Shakur Stevenson-Oscar Valdez on the same night did 1.35 Million in America. So is 1.5 Worldwide a good number? Hearn's acting like it is on Social Media :dunno: Great thread... Truly!! there is no context for some of these numbers lol! Its not like where you have a bar and someone can ask you "what % of each pint you sell is profit? and how does that compare to the industry profit %?"

correct me if im wrong here but is espn not in like 80 million homes in america which gives it a huge audience potentially, the question u are asking then is that if the womens were on espn how much would they do or if both were on dazn maybe We knew which networks they were both on beforehand right? Wasn't Hearn's reasoning for it being so much bigger is that the main steam media has picked it up? So I'm unsure why that matters.

It did 1.35 Million in America alone so I don't think so. correct me if im wrong here but is espn not in like 80 million homes in america which gives it a huge audience potentially, the question u are asking then is that if the womens were on espn how much would they do or if both were on dazn maybe

I think it was. It did similar numbers on a lesser platform and a bigger live gate in an iconic arena. It also got much more attention on the printed press the following day. It did 1.35 Million in America alone so I don't think so.

You said I shouldn't be comparing men's fights to women's fights. I'm only doing that because Eddie Hearn said it was a bigger fight than Shakur-Valdez. I think it was. It did similar numbers on a lesser platform and a bigger live gate in an iconic arena. It also got much more attention on the printed press the following day.

:lol1: Yes mate I was touched by the nurses at age 15, consensually. It's a question, and in fact with CubanNYC's answer, it actually looks like infact it is a good number. So what exactly are you talking about? Are you one of those woke guys opposed to questions? Also, I'm not particularly fond of women's boxing, no. I'm entitled to that. I'm not obliged to be a fan of women's boxing. I much prefer the women fights in the UFC, despite not being the biggest fan of those over there either. That said, Taylor-Serrano was good, I watched it while I was waiting for Shakur and I enjoyed it. I'll definitely tune in for Shields-Marshall too. Watched a few Rachel Ball fights after she beat Courtney aswell because I like her story. I'm sure I'll watch more in the future. I don't really understand the negativity towards womens boxing. Granted I've only started watching in the last few years, but I've enjoyed many women's fights. Now they are getting the exposure its easier to follow the rankings, the rivalries, and to be honest, I see two fighters trying to solve the problem in front of them, the same as mens.

You asked if it was a good number. I showed you how you could find out. Should have known though that this was actually about Eddie Hearn :lol1: You said I shouldn't be comparing men's fights to women's fights. I'm only doing that because Eddie Hearn said it was a bigger fight than Shakur-Valdez.

Because Eddie Hearn was saying it's a bigger fight than Stevenson-Valdez, that's why. He made the comparison not me. You asked if it was a good number. I showed you how you could find out. Should have known though that this was actually about Eddie Hearn :lol1:

It wasn't PPV but people stay had to pay for DAZN. But yes, we agree. 1.5 million WORLDWIDE is not that good of a number. The world is a big place but dazn as far as i can see only have about 8 mil out that 7.5 billion people so worldwide is smaller than we think plus a lot of those people watch soccer on dazn as it makes up the majority of its top figures so 1.5 mil out of that pot is very good on the surface anyway, go find the exact figures for nelo kov & joshua ruiz on dazn and we will have a full answer

:lol1: Yes mate I was touched by the nurses at age 15, consensually. It's a question, and in fact with CubanNYC's answer, it actually looks like infact it is a good number. So what exactly are you talking about? Are you one of those woke guys opposed to questions? Also, I'm not particularly fond of women's boxing, no. I'm entitled to that. I'm not obliged to be a fan of women's boxing. I much prefer the women fights in the UFC, despite not being the biggest fan of those over there either. That said, Taylor-Serrano was good, I watched it while I was waiting for Shakur and I enjoyed it. I'll definitely tune in for Shields-Marshall too. Watched a few Rachel Ball fights after she beat Courtney aswell because I like her story. I'm sure I'll watch more in the future. Ah ok just checking in on my fellow boxing mate is all. Repeated patters are a concern in my field of work so I was going to offer a number if my suspicions were correct. There is help for that kind of stuff and they’re a lot more discreet than the days of old. Since that’s not the case then I’ll drop the subject. Cheers. And have a good weekend.

It wasn't PPV but people stay had to pay for DAZN. But yes, we agree. 1.5 million WORLDWIDE is not that good of a number. In comparison though Canelo-Jacobs did 1.2 Million worldwide. So maybe it's not as bad as I thought.

Honest question, were you abused by a female in your younger days? You’ve been on one helluva anti-women’s boxing tear lately. :lol1: Yes mate I was touched by the nurses at age 15, consensually. It's a question, and in fact with CubanNYC's answer, it actually looks like infact it is a good number. So what exactly are you talking about? Are you one of those woke guys opposed to questions? Also, I'm not particularly fond of women's boxing, no. I'm entitled to that. I'm not obliged to be a fan of women's boxing. I much prefer the women fights in the UFC, despite not being the biggest fan of those over there either. That said, Taylor-Serrano was good, I watched it while I was waiting for Shakur and I enjoyed it. I'll definitely tune in for Shields-Marshall too. Watched a few Rachel Ball fights after she beat Courtney aswell because I like her story. I'm sure I'll watch more in the future.

What was Stevenson-Valdez’s overall numbers? Does it matter if I got 10 people from a single house, as opposed to 10 people from the neighbourhood? I’d imagine worldwide eyes can hook more fans though.

I know 1.5 Million PPV sales is good :lol1: That goes without saying. This fight wasn't PPV though and the 1.5 is a worldwide number, not just for America. It wasn't PPV but people stay had to pay for DAZN. But yes, we agree. 1.5 million WORLDWIDE is not that good of a number.

Or not? I've never seen the numbers be put into a "World Wide" category like DAZN/Eddie Hearn have done with Taylor-Serrano. Shakur Stevenson-Oscar Valdez on the same night did 1.35 Million in America. So is 1.5 Worldwide a good number? Hearn's acting like it is on Social Media :dunno: Honest question, were you abused by a female in your younger days? You’ve been on one helluva anti-women’s boxing tear lately.

No. 1.5 million PPV sales is considered very good, but those are just the total numbers for America. If you factor in worldwide figures then this should be higher. I know 1.5 Million PPV sales is good :lol1: That goes without saying. This fight wasn't PPV though and the 1.5 is a worldwide number, not just for America.