technically Wilder is 1-2 against Fury

Whether or not a ref gives a fighter a count on a knockdown is up to them. If Fury didn't have enough time to get up, then he would've been counted out. Technically, you are absolutely 100% correct.

But Szpilka didn't get a count. So technically, Fury didn't have time to get up. He just got KTFO, same as Szpilka. Whether or not a ref gives a fighter a count on a knockdown is up to them. If Fury didn't have enough time to get up, then he would've been counted out.

technically he should of got the first victory. there should of never been a count for Fury. there was no count for Szpilka https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lg2uQ1uoBJU&t=50s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xR6zKR0bTQ fury still won the trilogy and prevailed, but Wilder did win the first fight... 1-2 overall No he got up before the 10 count, unless the 10 count was falsified. Fury got up and rocked him afterward in the same round.

As a 99 % Fury hater (I'm rooting for him vs Whyte), Fury should be 3-0 (even in that dirty AF rematch) :(

technically he should of got the first victory. there should of never been a count for Fury. there was no count for Szpilka https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lg2uQ1uoBJU&t=50s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xR6zKR0bTQ fury still won the trilogy and prevailed, but Wilder did win the first fight... 1-2 overall Many times a boxer is given every opportunity to beat the count, unless the damage was piling up. The ref walked over to him and Fury said something. That exchange most certainly gave the ref reason to let it go on. Vs Spiz, the ref did start to count and figured out counting to 100 wouldn't be long enough.

More like 2-2 if we talking like 2 20 seconds counts the last fight... They got a weird lil trilogy if wilder was to man up and keep fighting he could see he getting closer and closer to fury...fury mightve ended that boy career tho

technically he should of got the first victory. there should of never been a count for Fury. there was no count for Szpilka https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lg2uQ1uoBJU&t=50s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xR6zKR0bTQ fury still won the trilogy and prevailed, but Wilder did win the first fight... 1-2 overall Technically, people can have an opinion and technically it doesn’t really matter to most.

OK? Which still makes him the Loser of the Trilogy... Respect to Wilder, I would love to see him continue to fight on and I do miss the guy honest (not so much his Fanboys) he is great for the Division and was one of the more exciting fighters in all of boxing regardless of his LACK OF Technical Boxing Skills. If he comes back it is still plenty of great fights to make, if not then again Respect to him he has nothing to be ashamed about he did well for himself and made himself a ton of money during that Fury Trilogy so he really doesn't have to fight again. Not bad for a man who was hoping to just be a Journeyman to provide for his daughter

Whether or not you feel Reiss shouldn't have given Fury a count is just your opinion. It wasn't against the rules and Fury got up in time. But Szpilka didn't get a count. So technically, Fury didn't have time to get up. He just got KTFO, same as Szpilka.

Since Fury got up and was fine, it's obvious that giving him the count was the right call. I think there should always be a count. The 10 seconds isn't going to kill someone, and they are given that amount of time by the rules.

Whether or not you feel Reiss shouldn't have given Fury a count is just your opinion. It wasn't against the rules and Fury got up in time.

Fury got up, and put a beating on Wilder

This post gives me vibes of a guy flooding his ex with messages saying they technically aren't broken up, because she didn't say those words while she packed her s*** and walked out

You clearly have no idea what technically means.

The first fight was a draw, I am not one of these people who think Tyson Fury won. Fury was decked twice, once extremely badly 'He was also backed up all night by Deontay Wilder'. That is not how to win a world title. That is not how you out box a opponent. Yes he got dropped twice and was moving but the question is how did you score it round by round?

The first fight was a draw, I am not one of these people who think Tyson Fury won. Fury was decked twice, once extremely badly 'He was also backed up all night by Deontay Wilder'. That is not how to win a world title. That is not how you out box a opponent. even with the KD's it was a clean UD or majority decision by Fury--

technically he should of got the first victory. there should of never been a count for Fury. there was no count for Szpilka https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lg2uQ1uoBJU&t=50s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xR6zKR0bTQ fury still won the trilogy and prevailed, but Wilder did win the first fight... 1-2 overall hahhahahahahahahahah fury took wilders soul, ruined his career and probably lost a total of 6 rounds in their 3 fight BRO the question with you is..WHY?but regarding you not fury or wilder

Yuup Wilder should have won the first fight. Fkin dirty ref should have counted Fury out as soon as be went to sleep but it was as if he had money on the fight as he gave Fury a chance to rise from the dead lol.

Wilder won all 3 by DQ. Fury used voodoo for all 3 fights and we all know that's wrong. Whilst Breland was a disloyal trainer, who spiked Wilder's water, and didn't allow Wilder to go to twerking class, it was only the voodoo that beat him. Nash out.

Deontay is the only fighter in boxing history who won 2 fights with one punch!:boxing: