Will / Does Usyk-Joshua II have a rematch clause?

I would guess the contract only stipulated AJ gets a rematch in case he lost which he did. I wouldnt think they planned on a trilogy if AJ wins the rematch and all that would've been signed before the first one Yea - probably the same thing the other way this time.

I would guess the contract only stipulated AJ gets a rematch in case he lost which he did. I wouldnt think they planned on a trilogy if AJ wins the rematch and all that would've been signed before the first one

This just in Eddie's also made the belts much like the hardcore belt in the WWF in which usyk has to defend it 24/7 anytime anywhere You just need to catch him at the right time like in a toilet and bring your own ref {"data-align":"none","data-size":"large","data-attachmentid":31149693}

Eddie hearn put in the original contract that usyk if he keeps on winning will have to defend the belt 10 times in a row against Joshua unless Joshua gets a win then its a closed case

Or course there is this is ReMatchroom we're talking about. They'll keep putting rematch clauses in until AJ wins.

Usyk would surely insist on a rematch clause for himself in case the 1 % chance of Joshua landing a bomb happens? Joshua wont deserve shit after being smacked up again.

There won't be a rematch clause. Might be a rematch though, if Joshua were to win. A lot of that will depend on the WBC Champion.

- -Both Usyk and AJ are aficionados of boxing history, so I don't see why Usyk wouldn't want an immediate rematch if he loses. AJ still the A-side as far as public interest and $$$ is concerned and will be into the near future. I see the point. He has the belts if he does lose them then yes their should be one more fight to settle the series. I cant see AJ beating Usyk though. If AJ is Aside do you think he will agree to a re-match clause?

Surely they can't keep having a re'match clause. If Usyk is the A side I doubt he will put a re-match clause in it. - -Both Usyk and AJ are aficionados of boxing history, so I don't see why Usyk wouldn't want an immediate rematch if he loses. AJ still the A-side as far as public interest and $$$ is concerned and will be into the near future.

Surely they can't keep having a re'match clause. If Usyk is the A side I doubt he will put a re-match clause in it.