Best of that Era?

Relate the answer you give to the quote at least when u quote it.

;n31058425]{"data-align":"none","data-size":"full","title":"hqdefault.jpg","data-attachmentid":31058426} Question for you? If this was Floyd Mayweather in this picture, after 3 close fights with Juan Marquez. If Manny Pacquiao UD Juan Marquez. Then… Manny Pacquiao UD Floyd Mayweather. Would there be any question who is the best of that era? it’s difficult to be true to yourself and Forget what really happened … But Under these scenarios Manny Pacquiao should be the best agree? Well when you cherry pick, duck and dodge every available opponent out there and fight an MMA fighter with zero boxing history, it's pretty easy to get to 50-0. Look at those 50-0, 60-0 foreigners that fight stiffs and compile a huge undefeated record.

Oh dear you deliberately choosing to ignore that people view unbeaten records with suspicion and in Floyd's case the suspicions would have been justified with his home advantage, cws, dodgy decisions not taking risks how people see it. etc etc open your eyes embrace the idea everyone in sports loses, embrace idea Floyd's lost and imagine if floyd rematched Castillo or maidena with 1st fight decisions having gone against him, imagine how floyd would have faired in rematch. Unanswered questions and asteri x against floyd, it would impress me if floyd could ve won rematch if he's lost 1st fights. Winning rematch after gifts not so much. No they don’t. Only idiot Manny slurpers do because Manny has a huge number of losses and Floyd hasn’t lost. Stop projective you’re BA on to everyone. Manny does the same CW’s and fights many of the same guys after Floyd did so are they less risky? Floyd rematched both and won more convincingly so your point is dumb as f-ck. You’re just a clown f-ckboy imbecile for even trying to argue this.

Oh dear you deliberately choosing to ignore that people view unbeaten records with suspicion and in Floyd's case the suspicions would have been justified with his home advantage, cws, dodgy decisions not taking risks how people see it. etc etc open your eyes embrace the idea everyone in sports loses, embrace idea Floyd's lost and imagine if floyd rematched Castillo or maidena with 1st fight decisions having gone against him, imagine how floyd would have faired in rematch. Unanswered questions and asteri x against floyd, it would impress me if floyd could ve won rematch if he's lost 1st fights. Winning rematch after gifts not so much. You seem to talk for a lot of phantom people, it's so apparent that you are one of the simple-minded fans Manny anointed.

This post is unbelievably stupid. We want you to lose because coming back from losing is somehow better than never losing. In what sport does beating every opponent count less than losing and coming back? In what sport is losing rewarded more than winning? Oh dear you deliberately choosing to ignore that people view unbeaten records with suspicion and in Floyd's case the suspicions would have been justified with his home advantage, cws, dodgy decisions not taking risks how people see it. etc etc open your eyes embrace the idea everyone in sports loses, embrace idea Floyd's lost and imagine if floyd rematched Castillo or maidena with 1st fight decisions having gone against him, imagine how floyd would have faired in rematch. Unanswered questions and asteri x against floyd, it would impress me if floyd could ve won rematch if he's lost 1st fights. Winning rematch after gifts not so much.

Pac s unquestionably best of era. Most don't think Floyd is unbeaten not that there is anything wrong in losing. We want future superstars to lose as We want to see how you comeback, that's important you need light and shad e in a career. We don't just want to see how you do when things are going well, we want to see how you do from coming back from loss whether you was robbed or you lost fair and square to make proper and accurate assessment. We want triologies because the first fight is the beginning of story, 2nd fight is middle of story and 3rd fight is end of conclusion. This post is unbelievably stupid. We want you to lose because coming back from losing is somehow better than never losing. In what sport does beating every opponent count less than losing and coming back? In what sport is losing rewarded more than winning?

why even try to argue..they have an excuse anytime the guy loses..let is go and let them have it

Only pac fans think that somehow losing > winning LOL

Pac s unquestionably best of era. Most don't think Floyd is unbeaten not that there is anything wrong in losing. We want future superstars to lose as We want to see how you comeback, that's important you need light and shad e in a career. We don't just want to see how you do when things are going well, we want to see how you do from coming back from loss whether you was robbed or you lost fair and square to make proper and accurate assessment. We want triologies because the first fight is the beginning of story, 2nd fight is middle of story and 3rd fight is end of conclusion. Manny is an easy beat with 8 loses Floyd would school all of Mannys other 7 losses, you're one of his simple-minded fans that's as dumb as a fence post.

Pac s unquestionably best of era. Most don't think Floyd is unbeaten not that there is anything wrong in losing. We want future superstars to lose as We want to see how you comeback, that's important you need light and shad e in a career You contradicted yourself in same paragraph. If Manny role reversal with Floyd, Manny becomes GOAT under this community/Media

Pac s unquestionably best of era. Most don't think Floyd is unbeaten not that there is anything wrong in losing. We want future superstars to lose as We want to see how you comeback, that's important you need light and shad e in a career. We don't just want to see how you do when things are going well, we want to see how you do from coming back from loss whether you was robbed or you lost fair and square to make proper and accurate assessment. We want triologies because the first fight is the beginning of story, 2nd fight is middle of story and 3rd fight is end of conclusion.

People clown Floyd hard anyway, there's lot to clown that doesn't involve Floyd flat on his face. Floyd has given a lot of ammunition. Pac fought 70 fights, with 4 common opponemts, no need to concentrate on triangle theory with these 3 fighters in pac, jmm and floyd. If Floyd koed Hatton in 2 rounds it would be used to prove Floyd's superiority, as would Floyd stopping cott o and dlh What triangle theory would it be when “Scenario” Manny Pacquiao UD Floyd Mayweather?

Floyd’s DV history is too toxic for a lot of media outlets. Sports TV media personalities, especially women, don’t want to give Floyd his credit because it looks bad celebrating a domestic abuser. Only when we see composite rankings done by boxing media do we see Floyd get his just due and is always ranked above Manny. Floyds resume- undefeated, undefeated in title fights, titles in 5 weight divisions, FOTD and a clear, decisive win over the previous FOTD, and the time he was the consensus #1 atop the p4p rankings, and his wins over HOFers makes him the clear best of the era. Manny’s resume makes him the clear #2.

Lool imagine Mayweather losing to Horn the media/community would clown him soo hard. People clown Floyd hard anyway, there's lot to clown that doesn't involve Floyd flat on his face. Floyd has given a lot of ammunition. Pac fought 70 fights, with 4 common opponemts, no need to concentrate on triangle theory with these 3 fighters in pac, jmm and floyd. If Floyd koed Hatton in 2 rounds it would be used to prove Floyd's superiority, as would Floyd stopping cott o and dlh

;n31058464] Yeh in this thread that is Floyd Mayweather Laying there not Manny Pacquiao. Manny Pacquiao is 50-0 Lool imagine Mayweather losing to Horn the media/community would clown him soo hard.

Imagine it’s Floyd taking a quick nap. Tho Yeh in this thread that is Floyd Mayweather Laying there not Manny Pacquiao. Manny Pacquiao is 50-0

hes only taking a quick nap Imagine it’s Floyd taking a quick nap. Tho

hes only taking a quick nap