Passive-aggressive behavior is when you express negative feelings indirectly instead of openly talking about them. During World War II, when soldiers wouldn't follow officers' orders, experts described them as "passive-aggressive." A new term back then, but still relevant today.
Pure emotions
You think I'm being passive aggressive?
I think your opinion is trash, I think you know little about boxing, and I think you're weird as fook for dedicating the last 10 years to battling Manny Pacquiao fans on an internet message board. You know what I think is "pure emotions"? Someone who looks at Manny Pacquiao's entire resume and grades it F's all the way down simply because you don't like him or his fans. You are the definition of "pure emotions". You're so emotional over it that you spend your days living and breathing on an boxing message board racking up thousands and thousands of posts in a single calendar year mostly because of one boxer.
Is that passive aggressive for me to say, you weird fooker?
I'm not being passive aggressive when I say that you're still good in my book, btw. I don't have anything against you as a person, and as a person, you're still good in my book. You're just weird af. And that's okay. Let your freak flag fly you weird son of a bytch
:greddy2:
Passive-aggressive behavior is when you express negative feelings indirectly instead of openly talking about them. During World War II, when soldiers wouldn't follow officers' orders, experts described them as "passive-aggressive." A new term back then, but still relevant today.
Pure emotions
Sounds good buddy
And I look forward to the next 15 years and additional 200,000 posts of you telling us how questionable Manny Pacquiao's resume is
Cheers BodyBagz
:beerchug:
:)
Just know this, knowing your pov, I would not enter a thread of yours regarding either fighter. I wouldn't want it to look like this.
Don't know if true mutual civility or sarcasm is taking place
That said, whether or not he'd notice, I would not be a fan if he had such a questionable resume. Call me crazy.
Sounds good buddy
And I look forward to the next 15 years and additional 200,000 posts of you telling us how questionable Manny Pacquiao's resume is
Cheers BodyBagz
:beerchug:
And May wouldn't care because I'm going to go out on a limb and say that he wasn't fighting for your approval or any of you other dudes behind a keyboard here. Just like Pacquiao will sleep just fine despite b-scene poster Body Bagz and anyone else "denouncing" his resume and legacy lol
You made it seem as if Pac only paid attention to his fans....All fan bases are strangers to their heroes.
That said, whether or not he'd notice, I would not be a fan if he had such a questionable resume. Call me crazy.
I would denounce May as one of my favorite fighters if he had a string of opponents that I listed. Nothing to be proud of, IMHO.
And May wouldn't care because I'm going to go out on a limb and say that he wasn't fighting for your approval or any of you other dudes behind a keyboard here. Just like Pacquiao will sleep just fine despite b-scene poster Body Bagz and anyone else "denouncing" his resume and legacy lol
Hatton was shot. Cotto was 1 year removed from the plaster beating, war with Clottey and on top of that weight drained. Vargas, Algieri, Diaz’ best wins were…?
Algieri was the WBO lightweight belt holder. Diaz held the WBC lightweight belt. Vargas was the WBO welterweight belt holder. Hatton was 45-1. Cotto was 34-1.
Look whatever we'll just have to agree to disagree. Y'all have a nice day :boxing:
But yeah for shyts and giggles I'm just gonna pull off 6 random opponents you mentioned that Pacquiao beat whom you gave him zero credit for. Let's say Vargas, Algieri, Rios, Cotto, Diaz, Hatton. You gave him either D's or F's for these wins. So yeah you gave him no credit at all.
These guys had a combined record of 191-5-2 when Pacquiao fought them. Think about that for a second. Yet you give him zero credit at all.
It just goes to show that you cannot be reasoned with at all. I hate to say it man, because like I said outside of our differences in opinion here, I have no problem with you. But you're what's wrong with the boxing fanbase in general. Any boxer you don't like you completely discredit anything and everything they've ever accomplished and you can't be reasoned with.
Pacquiao could beat a Tyrannosaurus Rex in the ring and you'd grade it a D minus and say that the T-Rex was war torn and shot.
Hatton was shot. Cotto was 1 year removed from the plaster beating, war with Clottey and on top of that weight drained. Vargas, Algieri, Diaz’ best wins were…?
But yeah for shyts and giggles I'm just gonna pull off 6 random opponents you mentioned that Pacquiao beat whom you gave him zero credit for. Let's say Vargas, Algieri, Rios, Cotto, Diaz, Hatton. You gave him either D's or F's for these wins. So yeah you gave him no credit at all.
These guys had a combined record of 191-5-2 when Pacquiao fought them. Think about that for a second. Yet you give him zero credit at all.
It just goes to show that you cannot be reasoned with at all. I hate to say it man, because like I said outside of our differences in opinion here, I have no problem with you. But you're what's wrong with the boxing fanbase in general. Any boxer you don't like you completely discredit anything and everything they've ever accomplished and you can't be reasoned with.
Pacquiao could beat a Tyrannosaurus Rex in the ring and you'd grade it a D minus and say that the T-Rex was war torn and shot.
More concentration spent on an emotional level than to debate my opinion. Remember, Pac doesn't know you exist either, so calm down.
What other fan base does this ?
If a person feels I got a grade wrong, let's read all about it.
Grading Pac's opponents (WHEN he fought them)
Thurman B-
Shot Broner F
Shot Lucas F-
HORN F-
Vargas D
Bradley C+ (once was enough)
May A-
Algieri* F
Shot Rios F-
JMM* B
Shot Mosley D-
Shot Margarito* F-
Shot Clottey F
Hatton F
Shot DLH* F-
Cotto* D+
Diaz D-
KindaShot Marco D (once was enough)
KindaShot Erik D+
Prior to Erik, I'm going have to refer to Pac fans to grade those guys.
You say that people don't answer you and that's because they can't refute your points. When in reality it's because what would be the point? Debating with you on anything Pacquiao related would be the biggest waste of time and energy ever. You're so jaded because of your blatant hatred of Pacquiao that you're going to see what you want to see. There's nothing anyone could say or do that would ever change your mind. So again what would be the point? Why would anybody waste their time?
Look you are certainly free to believe what you want. Nobody can take that from you. But in the end boxing historians will remember Pacquiao as an all-time great. And there's nothing you will ever be able to do to take that from him. No matter how many different accounts you make, or how many thousands of posts you make here will ever change that. It's an exercise in futility, BodyBagz. So just give it up. Move on with your life. Go outside. Go get a productive hobby. Quit thinking about Manny freaking Pacquiao all day. There's more to life out there buddy and I hope you find it, because this is no way to live.
Grading Pac's opponents (WHEN he fought them)
Thurman B-
Shot Broner F
Shot Lucas F-
HORN F-
Vargas D
Bradley C+ (once was enough)
May A-
Algieri* F
Shot Rios F-
JMM* B
Shot Mosley D-
Shot Margarito* F-
Shot Clottey F
Hatton F
Shot DLH* F-
Cotto* D+
Diaz D-
KindaShot Marco D (once was enough)
KindaShot Erik D+
Prior to Erik, I'm going have to refer to Pac fans to grade those guys.
Everyone is shot huh?
Your brain is shot.
:dance:
Grading Pac's opponents (WHEN he fought them)
Thurman B-
Shot Broner F
Shot Lucas F-
HORN F-
Vargas D
Bradley C+ (once was enough)
May A-
Algieri* F
Shot Rios F-
JMM* B
Shot Mosley D-
Shot Margarito* F-
Shot Clottey F
Hatton F
Shot DLH* F-
Cotto* D+
Diaz D-
KindaShot Marco D (once was enough)
KindaShot Erik D+
Prior to Erik, I'm going have to refer to Pac fans to grade those guys.
The dude called cotto shot when pac fought him in 2009
Then listed cotto 2012 as one of Floyd's top wins
:dance:
I'm pretty sure B-Bagz has discredited every single Pacquiao win with the exception of the Thurman win. So in the world of B-Bagz, Manny has a record of 1-7-2 and is an F level boxer. I think he rates Rod Salka's career more highly.
The dude called cotto shot when pac fought him in 2009
Then listed cotto 2012 as one of Floyd's top wins
:dance:
No I didn't. I added the *, never said he was shot.
Unless you can back up your claim :boxing: