Remember when Oscar said Canelo will miss Golden Boy. What Oscar meant is Canelo will no longer have that paid judge advantage--there will come a time when the fight is closer than people expected and Canelo will no longer have that mafia advantage that Oscar provides. Hearn has his petty shenanigans but the big boys play differently--they pay judge, referee and all sorts of real game changing stuffs.
Oscar is the only one of 3 promotional companies who has access to this mafia like underworld, the other two were the originals: Bob Arum and Don King. No other promotional company--No not even Hearns at the moment has this access because not everyone can get to join the old boys club.
I thought you said this was a garbage cherrypick of a bum? Why are you even entertaining these ideas?(oh right because you're trying to push contradicting narratives)
If you believed that,you wouldn't be contemplating BJS winning or any of this.
That said,your theory is easily debunked,if judges really favoured Canelo so much & he supposedly can't lose a decision like paulina says,then why has Canelo had so many split decisions & barely won by like 1 rd or 2 even in fights he was winning clearly? Why Adelaide Byrd the only 1 who had Canelo losing to con? We supposed to believe she was against Canelo v Con but not v Ggg? :wtf:
This is my first post about Canelo. You must be mistaking me for another poster. This is my take and I stand by it. You have yours.
Remember when Oscar said Canelo will miss Golden Boy. What Oscar meant is Canelo will no longer have that paid judge advantage--there will come a time when the fight is closer than people expected and Canelo will no longer have that mafia advantage that Oscar provides. Hearn has his petty shenanigans but the big boys play differently--they pay judge, referee and all sorts of real game changing stuffs.
Oscar is the only one of 3 promotional companies who has access to this mafia like underworld, the other two were the originals: Bob Arum and Don King. No other promotional company--No not even Hearns at the moment has this access because not everyone can get to join the old boys club.
I thought you said this was a garbage cherrypick of a bum? Why are you even entertaining these ideas?(oh right because you're trying to push contradicting narratives)
If you believed that,you wouldn't be contemplating BJS winning or any of this.
That said,your theory is easily debunked,if judges really favoured Canelo so much & he supposedly can't lose a decision like paulina says,then why has Canelo had so many split decisions & barely won by like 1 rd or 2 even in fights he was winning clearly? Why Adelaide Byrd the only 1 who had Canelo losing to con? We supposed to believe she was against Canelo v Con but not v Ggg? :wtf: