Why did Pacquiao fight Tim Bradley three times?

Because fighters fight. That’s why. Stay in that modern era mentality and see where it gets you.

Hes the only man to stop barerra not including cuts ...is that any good or you want some more? I'd like to know the names of the 8 div champs Pac won from

i think we needed 4. give tim a chance to even it out, and then if he won then we woudl get 5! Better yet, whenever Pac is satisfied is when the series ends

Because Arum was matchmaker and he gives us the fights the public really wants to see, like Pac-Bradley 3 and Crawford vs Jose Zepeda

Jones KO’d barrera but Pac-Barrera was a great victory imo Technically it was a dq I was just baiting Pretty sure it was Devon Alexander that first kod barerra

Hes the only man to stop barerra not including cuts ...is that any good or you want some more? Jones KO’d barrera but Pac-Barrera was a great victory imo

Pac's matchmakers couldn't build more perfect Pac opponents. Do yourself a favor and ask yourself what exactly (and in as much detail AS YOU CAN STAND) has Pac ever done that was so special. Out here, Pac fans are all about blanket statements. Never details. Hes the only man to stop barerra not including cuts ...is that any good or you want some more?

Once was enough for Pac Horn was all for it :boxing: It's a silly notion that every L has to have a rematch. Pac beat plenty of guys once and moved on. We didn't need 3 Pac vs Timmys i think we needed 4. give tim a chance to even it out, and then if he won then we woudl get 5!

3rd fight was totally unnecessary. Arum was basically implying, although not officially announcing that it could be Pac's retirement fight. He clearly said that to get more buys. Funny enough, I believe Pac was the favorite going in, but a decent amount of people thought Pac was done and Bradley would pull off a decision. Then the fight it ended up being even more of a decisive win for Pac than the first two fights.

damn we coudl have gotten 3 pac horn fights! Once was enough for Pac Horn was all for it :boxing: It's a silly notion that every L has to have a rematch. Pac beat plenty of guys once and moved on. We didn't need 3 Pac vs Timmys

Pac did not rematch all of his losses, Definitely not Horn damn we coudl have gotten 3 pac horn fights!

Marco and Erik are slow? Methodical and easy to hit? Also righties? Whats that got to do with anything To have a credible win it has to be a southpaw? What are you on? Pac's matchmakers couldn't build more perfect Pac opponents. Do yourself a favor and ask yourself what exactly (and in as much detail AS YOU CAN STAND) has Pac ever done that was so special. Out here, Pac fans are all about blanket statements. Never details.

Way too high ?!?!? As often as your team repeats ''8 DIV CHAMP'', how can his standards not be high ? Don't deflect Pac fans were calling JMM a coward for retiring :lol1: I don't care about a guy ''winning'' up until he lost. If JMM was there for the taking, Pac failed to close the show. You do realize Pac fans make more threads about May than they do about Pac....even though May is RETIRED !!! I am a big fans of both Marco and Erik. That doesn't mean they weren't the perfect Pac opponents (slow, methodical, easy to hit, righties) If you had an ounce of integrity, you'd know I post facts. Not my fault those facts are painful. Marco and Erik are slow? Methodical and easy to hit? Also righties? Whats that got to do with anything To have a credible win it has to be a southpaw? What are you on?

Talk to his promoter Bob Arum.

Tim was a credible opponent at the first fight but that was a robbery. Tim earned his second shot plus being an in-house fight for TR made it easy to do. Third one was unnecessary but again, another in house fight.

Are you new in boxing? Because he lost the first fight. You need 3 - 0 or 2-1 to win the trilogy. Can you stop with these silly questions? Pac did not rematch all of his losses, Definitely not Horn

Are you new in boxing? Because he lost the first fight. You need 3 - 0 or 2-1 to win the trilogy. Can you stop with these silly questions?

Your standards for pacquiao are way too high Who would you suggest has a good resume? Fury or wilder who is and isn't hard to hit? Who's begging for a 5th fight? I think that boats long sailed However at that time a 5th fight would have been decent to see Pacquiao was all over marquez until the ko it looked like his defining victory until it was defining in the opposite You go on about pac fans but you are the number 1 pac hater around here You disregard barerra and Morales as credible opponents? Anyone with half a brain would take whatever you say from now on with a pinch of salt Way too high ?!?!? As often as your team repeats ''8 DIV CHAMP'', how can his standards not be high ? Don't deflect Pac fans were calling JMM a coward for retiring :lol1: I don't care about a guy ''winning'' up until he lost. If JMM was there for the taking, Pac failed to close the show. You do realize Pac fans make more threads about May than they do about Pac....even though May is RETIRED !!! I am a big fans of both Marco and Erik. That doesn't mean they weren't the perfect Pac opponents (slow, methodical, easy to hit, righties) If you had an ounce of integrity, you'd know I post facts. Not my fault those facts are painful.

Went life and almost death with Marquez Went 1-2 with Morales, who is the definition of a Pac opponent (doesn't mind eating a ton of punches) 3 fights vs Bradley, a pillow puncher and Barrera (a smarter version of Erik but still easy to hit) Bradley beat JMM. Was never a need for a 2nd fight Pac and his fans were, and still are, begging for a 5th fight :lol1: Your standards for pacquiao are way too high Who would you suggest has a good resume? Fury or wilder who is and isn't hard to hit? Who's begging for a 5th fight? I think that boats long sailed However at that time a 5th fight would have been decent to see Pacquiao was all over marquez until the ko it looked like his defining victory until it was defining in the opposite You go on about pac fans but you are the number 1 pac hater around here You disregard barerra and Morales as credible opponents? Anyone with half a brain would take whatever you say from now on with a pinch of salt

Is that laughable those are huge names and to go against them time again was always a huge risk That's more of a statement of how game and legendary manny is imo Went life and almost death with Marquez Went 1-2 with Morales, who is the definition of a Pac opponent (doesn't mind eating a ton of punches) 3 fights vs Bradley, a pillow puncher and Barrera (a smarter version of Erik but still easy to hit) Bradley beat JMM. Was never a need for a 2nd fight Pac and his fans were, and still are, begging for a 5th fight :lol1: