Guy is very good, has iron chin, nobody stopped him so far, he will give us many good fights, but his style is a little bit too static, sometimes he looks like some statue in the ring. Judges don`t like those type of guys that is why are so many close decisions in his fights. Just like Clottey, he can beat all fringe contenders and gatekeepers, but he will usually lose a decision when fighting other top guy.
Just don't eat Bunku Stew before you fight Pacquiao hectarihype job Szef
Brother I ate okra boiled that stuff is great to relieve the bowels the next morning I too dump right after eating oatmeal.
Clottey could never finish strong in big fights. In one fight he didn't even fight.
I still would favor Clottey over Ugas. Ugas is solid but nothing spectacular.
Hmmm
That is actually a Good Comparison, I can see it! Ugas is more Skilled than Clottey while Clottey had more Power
But yeah Ugas use a good Tight High Guard at times similar to Clottey which can be very hard to penetrate. Like Ugas, Clottey also got screwed over in some Decisions as well.
I don't think Ugas would ever get a Decisions over the Top guys in his Divisions BUT like Clottey I think he would be a tough challenge for all of them with that Size and Jab
Ugas let his hands go more vs Ramos which left him open for Ramos to land big shots and wobbled him a couple of times but Ugas wanted to assure he won that Belt and even with being more aggressive than he usually is and they still almost robbed him
I don't think Ugas ever had as good moments and fights as Clottey did vs Cotto and Margarito. He was pathetic against Pac and then disappeared but I think he was fighting on a better level than Ugas has so far. But yes, both are similar "dark horse" types that round out a division and make them better
Clottey would def beat Ugas, guy’s that can’t lead are his bread and butter.
Tommora!
Too bad Clottey’s career got ruined after the Pac bout. That fight became his living reputation which shouldn’t be cause it’s not true. He could have done much better in his career if he was given more opportunities. HBO and Roach didn’t give him proper justice afterwards
Yeah, they're both B side fighters as well. No one pays to see fighters like them, but someone like Ugas is a solid opponent for anyone just like Clottey was at one point.
Not the most exciting, but they're tough gritty fighters.
Ugas is 34 and Clottey is 42 so they are 8 years apart. That is not a generation. Clottey was still fighting a few years ago. They are both very good but they have their own style and fight differently.
I wanted to say that Ugas is the new Clottey.
Guy is very good, has iron chin, nobody stopped him so far, he will give us many good fights, but his style is a little bit too static, sometimes he looks like some statue in the ring. Judges don`t like those type of guys that is why are so many close decisions in his fights. Just like Clottey, he can beat all fringe contenders and gatekeepers, but he will usually lose a decision when fighting other top guy.Ugas is 34 and Clottey is 42 so they are 8 years apart. That is not a generation. Clottey was still fighting a few years ago. They are both very good but they have their own style and fight differently.
"If Ugas and Clottey fight, I would pick my money on Clottey to to beat him."
of course you would...cause youre a pbc hating fgt
good thing you dont have any money
Ugas movement and hand speed alone is levels above Clottey.
Ugas would not have fought Pacquiao the same way Clottey did. That fight was a disgrace and I lost all respect for Clottey after that fight.
I think his defense is good, good rolling, good blocking, good catching. needs to stop the showboating and be lighter on his feet. he is a very good fighter. clottey is a little more stiff and high guard like, were as ugas changes his guard up. but yes very interesting. ugas vs spence, what a fight that is