What Happened When Floyd Mayweather Took On Jose Luis Castillo (HIS ONLY LOSS?)

At no point did I use the media scorecards to justify or argue who won the fight. I used the media score cards to help you understand why you are out of touch with reality and your delusions have taken over. So, that is not an argument for authority at all. Even if it was it is still not an argument from authority anyway. You can break down the fight detail by detail a million times. Your judgment is clouded by your bias and delusion so you see what you want to see, which isn’t reality. I’ve explained this to you already. Greened k. Solid posts from a good poster

that was kind of my point :fing02: For a terrible poster you have a good repped.

I think the first Maidana fight has a better case for a loss than the first Castillo fight. Aggression that is not landing cleanly and is being countered and worked to the body does not win fights , eg 10 punches are thrown in a wild flurry, 2 land 8 miss and there is 4 clean crisp counters, you guys give it to the one who landed 2 punches because he was busy being aggressive, judges dont score like this the average fan.

I think the first Maidana fight has a better case for a loss than the first Castillo fight.

i dont need to look it up, you do since you are the one who just used it to make your argument. according to you floyd won because the members of the media and judges said he won. you literally never mentioned anything about the fight. for example if the judges and media said 2 plus 2 is 5 they have to be right! well according to you that is...thats an argument from authority and yeah its not a legit argument so when you want to come up with a real one let me know. you see how i broke down the punches in round 7 and what each guy landed and ranked them accordingly in order to make my case and you did nothing of the sort besides say everyone thinks floyd won therefore he won? yeah thats not a good argument. you do realize ad hominem attacks dont make for a good argument right so where is your breakdown? pac landing the better punches in round 7 is not reality? so who did? im assuming by default floyd right? so go to the tape and timestamp me his punches and ill review them then ill compare them to pacs. you could be right. im open to changing my mind but i just watched the round several times and besides the couple lil jabs i didnt see anything but ill always look again. you wont even look once! At no point did I use the media scorecards to justify or argue who won the fight. I used the media score cards to help you understand why you are out of touch with reality and your delusions have taken over. So, that is not an argument for authority at all. Even if that was my argument, that would still not be an argument from authority anyway. You can break down the fight detail by detail a million times. Your judgment is clouded by your bias and delusion so you see what you want to see, which isn’t reality. I’ve explained this to you already.

I guess yall think if you make this thread enough times over and over it will become a fact.... i just checked boxrec and floyd is now 49-1. we did it!

Yeahhhhh I think you might need to look up what arguing from an authority fallacy is there mate :lol1: You literally are making it up :lol1: Not on purpose. It’s not your fault. Again, you can’t grasp the reality here. You see what you want to see and dismiss what you don’t want to see and can’t understand why almost no one see’s it as you do. The answer is because your judgement is so incredibly clouded that you are totally out of touch with the actual reality of that happened and are arguing from a state of delusion. It’s a common theme of the mentally ill/delusional. i dont need to look it up, you do since you are the one who just used it to make your argument. according to you floyd won because the members of the media and judges said he won. you literally never mentioned anything about the fight. for example if the judges and media said 2 plus 2 is 5 they have to be right! well according to you that is...thats an argument from authority and yeah its not a legit argument so when you want to come up with a real one let me know. you see how i broke down the punches in round 7 and what each guy landed and ranked them accordingly in order to make my case and you did nothing of the sort besides say everyone thinks floyd won therefore he won? yeah thats not a good argument. you do realize ad hominem attacks dont make for a good argument right so where is your breakdown? pac landing the better punches in round 7 is not reality? so who did? im assuming by default floyd right? so go to the tape and timestamp me his punches and ill review them then ill compare them to pacs. you could be right. im open to changing my mind but i just watched the round several times and besides the couple lil jabs i didnt see anything but ill always look again. you wont even look once!

I guess yall think if you make this thread enough times over and over it will become a fact....

appeal to authority fallacy. pac landed the better punches in more rounds. i have seen that on film. that is what happened. im not making that up. floyd simply landed very few actual clean solid shots during the fight. pac didnt land a lot either but he landed more and in many rounds a lot more. thats how boxing is scored. who did better not did pac meet some insanely high standard that doesnt apply to floyd. i think its being biased pretending that a flicking jab that literally touches pacs nose or sticking your hand out with an open glove to brush away your opponent equates to a punch that rocks your opponents head around. they arent worth the same. for example in round 7. floyd lands one good counter jab that rocks pacs head around, one decent jab, and a couple grazing jabs that make almost no impact at all(nose grazers). pac lands a huge left hand counter on floyds head that seems to slightly buckle his legs, another big left hand to the body that doubles floyd over and makes him hold, another left to the body, and 4 right hands that rocks floyds head around with much more force than any of floyds lil jabs(besides maybe the one i previously mentioned) and on top of that pac landed some mediocre punches that didnt land completely flush but if we are counting those for floyd as clean punches then we have to be fair right? so i got 7 good solid connects for pac to floyds 1 with the 2 best punches by far coming from pac. then if we factor in the mediocre and crap(grazing, mostly blocked) punches which were about even how does floyd catch up? i dont see it. yet all the judges and im sure you scored it for floyd too. is it possible you could be wrong? that you think floyds punches were landing when they werent? that you missed some of pacs nice shots? its there on film. it doesnt change...or does it... pac landed more clean punches, pac landed the better punches. so why did floyd win that round? based on what? oh thats just me being biased. i should have pretended all those lil taps to pacs nose were devastating! maybe you have the version where floyd actually lands good punches? i dont know i just have the normal version. where can i find this secret version? im literally watching the one floyd posted on his youtube page so not sure where to find it. why did floyd edit out most of his clean punches? do you think some pac fan hacked his page and took out most of his good work? im gonna email him! floyd look what they did! Yeahhhhh I think you might need to look up what arguing from an authority fallacy is there mate :lol1: You literally are making it up :lol1: Not on purpose. It’s not your fault. Again, you can’t grasp the reality here. You see what you want to see and dismiss what you don’t want to see and can’t understand why almost no one see’s it as you do. The answer is because your judgement is so incredibly clouded that you are totally out of touch with the actual reality of that happened and are arguing from a state of delusion. It’s a common theme of the mentally ill/delusional.

- -Looked like Castillo busted up his ribs. Badly enough that all he could do was hang on to the finish for the gift decision.

This guy still can’t even grasp or get his head round why 100% of the media and the overwhelming majority of fans had Mayweather winning the fight by a comfortable margin. He has no idea that his bias has such a hold over him that he’s totally out of touch with reality. Seek help mate honestly it’s for your own sake. appeal to authority/majority fallacy. pac landed the better punches in more rounds. i have seen that on film. that is what happened. im not making that up. floyd simply landed very few actual clean solid shots during the fight. pac didnt land a lot either but he landed more and in many rounds a lot more. thats how boxing is scored. who did better not did pac meet some insanely high standard that doesnt apply to floyd. i think its being biased pretending that a flicking jab that literally touches pacs nose or sticking your hand out with an open glove to brush away your opponent equates to a punch that rocks your opponents head around. they arent worth the same. for example in round 7. floyd lands one good counter jab that rocks pacs head around, one decent jab, and a couple grazing jabs that make almost no impact at all(nose grazers). pac lands a huge left hand counter on floyds head that seems to slightly buckle his legs, another big left hand to the body that doubles floyd over and makes him hold, another left to the body, and 4 right hands that rocks floyds head around with much more force than any of floyds lil jabs(besides maybe the one i previously mentioned) and on top of that pac landed some mediocre punches that didnt land completely flush but if we are counting those for floyd as clean punches then we have to be fair right? so i got 7 good solid connects for pac to floyds 1 with the 2 best punches by far coming from pac. then if we factor in the mediocre and crap(grazing, mostly blocked) punches which were about even how does floyd catch up? i dont see it. yet all the judges and im sure you scored it for floyd too. is it possible you could be wrong? that you think floyds punches were landing when they werent? that you missed some of pacs nice shots? its there on film. it doesnt change...or does it... pac landed more clean punches, pac landed the better punches. so why did floyd win that round? based on what? oh thats just me being biased. i should have pretended all those lil taps to pacs nose were devastating! maybe you have the version where floyd actually lands good punches? i dont know i just have the normal version. where can i find this secret version? im literally watching the one floyd posted on his youtube page so not sure where to find it. why did floyd edit out most of his clean punches? do you think some pac fan hacked his page and took out most of his good work? im gonna email him! floyd look what they did!

Judges always gave favor to a cash cow and that is normal in boxing that's why money may won. If castillo wants to win that fight he needs to ko money may but he couldn't, sorry castillo fans tough luck.

Castillo could be on PEDS that night that's why he gave money may that kind of fight.

He learned to change his style up, and beat that a$$ in the rematch

so you preferred the activity over the clean punches in that one. why? or did you think floyd was landing cleaner? i legitimately dont know. i can see how someone can judge a fight live and be wrong but upon review it was pac with the much better punches so just wondering This guy still can’t even grasp or get his head round why 100% of the media and the overwhelming majority of fans had Mayweather winning the fight by a comfortable margin. He has no idea that his bias has such a hold over him that he’s totally out of touch with reality. Seek help mate honestly it’s for your own sake.

116-112 Mayweather. so you preferred the activity over the clean punches in that one. why? or did you think floyd was landing cleaner? i legitimately dont know. i can see how someone can judge a fight live and be wrong but upon review it was pac with the much better punches so just wondering

You’re obsessed man... :lol1: Floyd’s a d***head but he deservedly retired at 50-0. Get over it... no he didnt but my post was clearly a troll post

no. it was a schooling. a domination. a master class. like floyd against pac where pac landed the vast majority of hard clean punches and floyd didnt. we are living in a postmodernist world where words have no real meaning anymore i guess. the jmm-pac fights were also robberies!!! schoolings! masterclasses! dominations! You’re obsessed man... :lol1: Floyd’s a d***head but he deservedly retired at 50-0. Get over it...

how did you score floyd vs pac...activity vs efficiency once again. although its pretty safe to say castillo landed far more effective punches than floyd did against pac but lets speak in broad terms 116-112 Mayweather.

2nd L was right here your team can not enter the ring that a DQ Discretion of the referee.