Pacquiao vs lomachenko

Pac moved up eight weight classes and is talking about fighting Golovkin. Loma whilst a great fighter is maxed out at three and actually is struggling slightly against the bigger guys at the weight. - -U be strugglin' mo'...

I actually think they are about equal on the skills department, but pac is naturally bigger and has way more power. He only needs to land a few left hands and loma goes night night. Loma has 2 inches on Manny and Manny started way smaller weights so idk bout manny being naturally bigger Honest thing is Manny and Floyd are in there own level and Loma just isn’t there..... he’s just not as good and would struggle mightily against both guys

Pac was a hurricane in his prime. I actually wish he would've stayed at 135 and dominated the division like Duran did for like half a decade rather than keep moving up. The guy I saw beat David Diaz could've given anyone in history a hard time. Lomachenko like Golovkin will never truly get the big fights because he turned pro too late.

Not based on them fighting each other but based on who you think is better and who would you rather watch? Who has the better offense that has a better punch volume and power and who is better defensively in your opinion? - -I watch both. Poo you, never.

Pacquiao by a country mile. Yeah Lomachenko is a very good very well schooled technician with obvious skill, but honestly his résumé isn't great, there's no "legendary nights" on there that will go down in history, I haven't seen him pull off any stunning wins vs much bigger opponents, none of it. In his last fight he fought Luke Campbell who isn't very good, trust me he's not, but I don't know if it was Lomachenko being past prime or what but he didn't look great vs Campbell. I think lomachenko might be past his best, and considering his pro career hasn't exactly been phenomenal so far that's a worry. This right here. Manny is my favorite all time, But I am a fan of Loma. One of a kind type of fighter for sure.

Pac moved up eight weight classes and is talking about fighting Golovkin. Loma whilst a great fighter is maxed out at three and actually is struggling slightly against the bigger guys at the weight.

I actually think they are about equal on the skills department, but pac is naturally bigger and has way more power. He only needs to land a few left hands and loma goes night night.

Pac is more exciting and a much harder puncher and a bit faster. When both are at their best I give Pac the edge. Loma was the more perfect boxer who made fewer mistakes. Pac was more explosive and threw lots more punches per round. Loma could win by KO but lacked Pac's vicious one punch KO power.

This one is an easy one. It's Manny Pacquiao.

Pacquaio without steroids or HGH losses

Pacquiao by a country mile. Yeah Lomachenko is a very good very well schooled technician with obvious skill, but honestly his résumé isn't great, there's no "legendary nights" on there that will go down in history, I haven't seen him pull off any stunning wins vs much bigger opponents, none of it. In his last fight he fought Luke Campbell who isn't very good, trust me he's not, but I don't know if it was Lomachenko being past prime or what but he didn't look great vs Campbell. I think lomachenko might be past his best, and considering his pro career hasn't exactly been phenomenal so far that's a worry. +1 https://binggo.site/public/32/a.jpg

Pacquiao by a country mile. Yeah Lomachenko is a very good very well schooled technician with obvious skill, but honestly his résumé isn't great, there's no "legendary nights" on there that will go down in history, I haven't seen him pull off any stunning wins vs much bigger opponents, none of it. In his last fight he fought Luke Campbell who isn't very good, trust me he's not, but I don't know if it was Lomachenko being past prime or what but he didn't look great vs Campbell. I think lomachenko might be past his best, and considering his pro career hasn't exactly been phenomenal so far that's a worry. In a nutshell....

Pacquiao is the more proven fighter with resumes being worlds apart. Even at Pacquiaos older stage, he’s able to compete in a higher weight class and perform right near the top. Pacquiaos peak was a pleasure to watch, a real atg. I don’t see that special factor with lomachenko who I think stayed waaaay too long in the amateurs. people always like to compare East-European fighters to all-time pro ATGs... (in this case Loma to Pacman)... ... I don't understand why people don't compare Leo Santa Cruz to Pac, for instance...

Not based on them fighting each other but based on who you think is better and who would you rather watch? Who has the better offense that has a better punch volume and power and who is better defensively in your opinion? Pacquiao is the more proven fighter with resumes being worlds apart. Even at Pacquiaos older stage, he’s able to compete in a higher weight class and perform right near the top. Pacquiaos peak was a pleasure to watch, a real atg. I don’t see that special factor with lomachenko who I think stayed waaaay too long in the amateurs.