Does Pacquiao have a win as significant as Mayweather beating Pacquiao ????

Well he beat a past prime Manny that he ducked for years, so Manny has way better wins. The Thurman win might be better. Manny had the better career, his fights were fun to watch, Floyd always cherrypicked opponents at the right time. Floyd;s last fights were against a new boxer (0-0) and washed up Berto. Where as Manny fought Lucas M., Broner and Thurman in a little over a year, despite being way past his best, being older and smaller.

The biggest win Pac has is blaming his performance on a hurt shoulder and still getting $100 per ppv. He kept all the money with the excuse.

No, not really. It means Pac beat the man Floyd ducked at 41, whilst Floyd ducked him at 37 years of age. It also means Floyd beat the not far removed from ko loss to jmm version and wasn't quite himself yet and thurman got the better version, and Pac has off night v floyd It also means Pac got an Iv version of floyd, and Floyd didn't give rematch as he knew if Pac was 100% h ed lose to pac. Let's be honest, Floyd gets little credit for win What it means is Pac actually got battered in that fight even though he pulled off the win. Pac arm hurt after the loss not before.:boxing: Dude was a juicer and a sore loser.

Floyd s around hovering around top 25-20 All time so there are at least 20 fighters with better resumes. And also because Floyd s rated extra higher than his resume suggests he would be on basis of people thinking his defence is up there with Parnell whitaker. It's not his resume that is talking pointing his defence that is comparable to anyone in history, not his resume. So in reality there are probably thirty odd people with better cv, Didn't you say this? :lol1: ... PBF if he can beat Hatton needs guys like Cotto and Mosely. Mosely because PBF needs to beat the man who beat the man. Moselys beaten DLH twice. ONly then can we talk about PBF being ATG along the SRL and Ali and SRRs of this world.

Pac is a joke

Duran, SRL, Ali, Willie Pep, SRL, Armstrong, Langford, Pacquiao on the top of my head. I was talking about his contemporaries, including now.

Duran, SRL, Ali, Willie Pep, SRL, Armstrong, Langford, Pacquiao on the top of my head. Ali, Duran, Willie pep, Armstrong and Langford do not have better resumes :lol1: and Pac doesn't have a win as significant as Floyd beating Pac :dance:

Duran, SRL, Ali, Willie Pep, SRL, Armstrong, Langford, Pacquiao on the top of my head. Floyd s around hovering around top 25-20 All time so there are at least 20 fighters with better resumes. And also because Floyd s rated extra higher than his resume suggests he would be on basis of people thinking his defence is up there with Parnell whitaker. It's not his resume that is talking pointing his defence that is comparable to anyone in history, not his resume. So in reality there are probably thirty odd people with better cv,

Yeah but be reasonable that win against Pac was so weak all he did is run around the ring like a phag! He didn’t prove anything! I’m not saying Pac won but but not much of a way to prove anything. Marquez figured a way to KO him. Not saying Mayweather isn’t great but come on man his resume is very opportunistic Pick a resume that's better than Floyd, both in name and challenges. I'll wait. Thanks. Triangle theories don't work. Floyd toyed with the Marquez that KOed the Pacman.

Floyd was past his prme as well, pac is younger and is still a champ today!! Here comes the size excuse, even though Pac had been a welterweight for 5 years before fighting Floyd and is still a welterweight 5 years later. Yea, lets forget floyd moved up in weight throughout his career as well :lol1: Got any more excuses? Look pac is 8 division champ. Pac being 8 division champ is better than floyd s win over pac, get over it. Age in boxing isn't chronological. It's mileage on clock and pac had more mileage. The fact pac is still looking good is a credit to pac and pac only. The fact floyd looked worn in his last fights, having had less wars and less fights is indicative of Floyd not being as great as pac. Most of the fighters floyd beat dissapeared almost instantly after floyd best them. So floyd fans are going way OTT with living off pac s and nelos wins. Most don't think floyd even beat pac and the fight wasn't without its controversies so how good can the win be in most peoples eyes? No matter how good Pac does, Floyd is nt taking any risks fighting a 5ft 5 inch man. It's not a great win however you spin it

You've blown my mind there, son. Mayweather outpointed a much smaller fighter who was clearly past his prime. Incredible, how does he do it? Floyd was past his prme as well, pac is younger and is still a champ today!! Here comes the size excuse, even though Pac had been a welterweight for 5 years before fighting Floyd and is still a welterweight 5 years later. Yea, lets forget floyd moved up in weight throughout his career as well :lol1: Got any more excuses?

Pac over Bradley is better because Bradley was an undefeated elite who cleaned out 140 and in his prime. Pacquiao stopped his roll. Mayweather beat Pacquiao after he’d been ko’d, forced out of the ring for a year and changed his style, the roll was already stopped. Same with Thurman, an elite, albeit not peak, in his physical prime and young, especially relative to Pacquiao, which is what makes it a great win. Marquez, prime elite, Barrera, prime elite, on a roll too. There was more substance on Pacquiao beating Thurman, Bradley, Barrera. Mayweather albeit a good win, is mainly just the Pacquiao name. He didn’t beat the machine. He didn’t fight the guy that was fighting Cotto, Margarito etc. In comparison the runs Mayweather is stopping is fraudulent and short runs, usually from hasbeens. Like Juicely beating a drained Margarito, and showing up painfully shot vs Mayweather with no juice, or Cotto, reastablishing himself as some top fighter because he beat a bum and two hasbeens, after Floyd goes right into losing to Trout, showing how elite he was at that point, or Ortiz beating other hypekin Berto. Amazing stuff. You deserve a reward for the this level of mental gymastics, crazy stuff. Lets put this in bullet points... Pacquiao clearly beat a "prime" bradley in 2014, then mayweather beat Pacquiao in 2015. If Pacquiao was better than bradley, and mayweather was better than pacquiao, then how is pacquiao beating bradley a better win than Mayweather beating the guy who beat bradley? Oh and Pac wasn't coming off a year layoff, he fought in november of 2014. Floyd actually had a longer layoff :lol1: Thurman wasn't in his prime. He recently came off a 2 year layoff due to injuries and almost got stopped by josesito. Anyway, if a 40 year old pac asserted superiority over thurman....and floyd beat a 4 year younger better version of pac, then how is Pacquiao beating thurman a better win than Mayweather beating a younger better version of the guy who beat Thurman? :lol1: Barrera and Marquez were 5 years older than Pac. He only beat Marquez by debated SD and Marquez was 34! Meanwhie, Pac is two years younger than Floyd and is still a champion 5 years later! Floyd beating Pacquiao when Pacquiao was the top 2 p4p fighter in the world, a champion, 2 years younger than him, and who went on to still be a champion 5 years after Floyd's victory over him >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ALL of those wins. Lets see what you come up with next, this is too easy

If the younger Manny was past his prime when he lost to Floyd then goes on years later to defeat Thurman that means Floyd was leagues above both. No, not really. It means Pac beat the man Floyd ducked at 41, whilst Floyd ducked him at 37 years of age. It also means Floyd beat the not far removed from ko loss to jmm version and wasn't quite himself yet and thurman got the better version, and Pac has off night v floyd It also means Pac got an Iv version of floyd, and Floyd didn't give rematch as he knew if Pac was 100% h ed lose to pac. Let's be honest, Floyd gets little credit for win

Does pacquiao have a win that is more significant than Mayweather beating Pac? Answer the question, I'm waiting :dance: They're calling you a troll because they can't answer the question without deleting their accounts:boxing:

You've blown my mind there, son. Mayweather outpointed a much smaller fighter who was clearly past his prime. Incredible, how does he do it? If the younger Manny was past his prime when he lost to Floyd then goes on years later to defeat Thurman that means Floyd was leagues above both.

Context is everything, which is exactly why you're wrong. Are you going to answer my questions and try to rebuttal everything I said or are you going to ignore it? If Pac beat a prime Bradley in 2014 and Mayweather beat Pac, who beat Bradley, in 2015... then how is pacquiao beating Bradley the better win when Pacquiao is better than Bradley? :lol1: If a 40 year old pac beat Thurman and proved himself to be superior to Thurman.... and Mayweather beat a younger better version of Pacquiao 4 years prior, then how is Pacquiao beating Thurman a better win? :lol1: I'm waiting :dance: Pac over Bradley is better because Bradley was an undefeated elite who cleaned out 140 and in his prime. Pacquiao stopped his roll. Mayweather beat Pacquiao after he’d been ko’d, forced out of the ring for a year and changed his style, the roll was already stopped. Same with Thurman, an elite, albeit not peak, in his physical prime and young, especially relative to Pacquiao, which is what makes it a great win. Marquez, prime elite, Barrera, prime elite, on a roll too. There was more substance on Pacquiao beating Thurman, Bradley, Barrera. Mayweather albeit a good win, is mainly just the Pacquiao name. He didn’t beat the machine. He didn’t fight the guy that was fighting Cotto, Margarito etc. In comparison the runs Mayweather is stopping is fraudulent and short runs, usually from hasbeens. Like Juicely beating a drained Margarito, and showing up painfully shot vs Mayweather with no juice, or Cotto, reastablishing himself as some top fighter because he beat a bum and two hasbeens, after Floyd goes right into losing to Trout, showing how elite he was at that point, or Ortiz beating other hypekin Berto. Amazing stuff.

Does pacquiao have a win that is more significant than Mayweather beating Pac? Answer the question, I'm waiting :dance: The trolling of yours has been addressed numerous times but you should be ignored in reality. But you like being entertained don't you? Beating a big name don't make it a great win silly. These young lions all want Pac on their resume still, not because it's a great win, they just want to share ring with the superstar its like getting a signature of your idol. Similar to teenage girls fawning over justin bieber wanting his signature. Pac s got numerous wins better than Floyd's win over pac. Only Floyd diehards use these silly lines of debate. I've never heard a randolph turpin fan ask has SR R got a better win than turpins win over srr? Is Pac being a higher AT G the deciding factor that drives Floyd fans to be innovative in ways to promote floyd? Only Floyd fans Behave like this, so insecure. You'd think Pac beat floyd 5 years ago. Why Floyd fans so unhappy?

mayweather's win over Pac is the same as Pac's win over ODLH he was knocked out and passed prime by then. Pac's prime is Cotto and Margarito. Mayweather didn't fight him then. Wait, Oscar was younger than Pac and ended up still being a champion 5 years after he lost to Pac? I didn't know that, thanks for the info! :lol1:

You have no limits to how stupid you are, do you? Just disappear already. You are useless here :spankme: Does pacquiao have a win that is more significant than Mayweather beating Pac? Answer the question, I'm waiting :dance:

Has Pacquiao ever successfully UNIFIED against a top 2 p4p fighter who is younger than him, an ATG, a former champ in multiple weight classes, and who ended up still being a champion 5 years later after the fight? Has he ever won a fight of the same magnitude as the event on May 2nd, 2015? This is a mindfck for all you p@ctards CHECKMATE You have no limits to how stupid you are, do you? Just disappear already. You are useless here :spankme: