why didnt GGG hire sugar hill over banks?

Golovkin got kicked out of the SNAC program? He did not want to wear their logo. That has been reported. Don't know if they wanted him to wear it instead of his customary Kazakhstan robe or he already has an agreement with someone else. Maybe he wanted to get paid to wear it. In any event they parted ways.

pure speculation u dont have any proof he is lazy and you are going by hear say on snac. Just shows how unprofessional a business snac is to air out any info about fighters that should be private. You really are blind dude. SNAC put that news out there because of Golovkins reputation of playing the victim and throwing others under the bus. They basically beat Golovkin to the punch and stuck to the facts. They didn’t say any bad thing about ggg they just said “They asked him to leave because he didn’t stick to the program.” What? They’re supposed to give Tom Loefflor the chance to try to spin another one of Golovkins failures and some how make it SNACS fault?

GGG is lazy as F. He doesn't want that work with aggressive trainers who don't settle for less. The fact that he got kicked out of the snac program tells everything. Banks is down to earth, doesn't demand huge $$$ to train, and goes along with everything. That could also be ggg's downfall, as banks never had any sense of urgency with his instructions in the derevyanchenko fight, a fight that ggg should rightfully lose. pure speculation u dont have any proof he is lazy and you are going by hear say on snac. Just shows how unprofessional a business snac is to air out any info about fighters that should be private.

GGG is lazy as F. He doesn't want that work with aggressive trainers who don't settle for less. The fact that he got kicked out of the snac program tells everything. Banks is down to earth, doesn't demand huge $$$ to train, and goes along with everything. Golovkin got kicked out of the SNAC program?

GGG is lazy as F. He doesn't want that work with aggressive trainers who don't settle for less. The fact that he got kicked out of the snac program tells everything. Banks is down to earth, doesn't demand huge $$$ to train, and goes along with everything. That could also be ggg's downfall, as banks never had any sense of urgency with his instructions in the derevyanchenko fight, a fight that ggg should rightfully lose.

Banks is a maintenance trainer. Think Golovkin chose him because he's easy to get along with, doesn't talk as much as Sanchez, doesn't need to be paid as much, and can let G do his own training while keeping focus on motivation and technique focus. Old fighters don't change their styles.

No one really knew that much about SugarHill to be fair. He didn't become a big deal until after Fury vs Wilder 2.

My guess is ggg is promoted by the klitschkos no ? Iam guessing he already somewhat of a relationship with banks thru his promotional ties . I fell hill would have been better suited aswell tho .

i think sugar is better overall maybe GGG can still use sugar hill at some point. I’ll tell you why Cause Banks is a yes man imo Doesn’t take a genius to see that Hill is much better qualified for the job

Sugar hill imho is a much better trainer because Banks plays it safety 1st & SH plays it offense 1st which is exactly what ggg needs,he should never have been dumb enough to think he can become Canelo late in his career. Before Canelo he would say defensive fighters were pvssies after Canelo he despite saying he won, decided to do a complete 180 on everything he ever stood for or fought like. Just my "biased" 2 cents, Btw I think ggg can never beat CURRENT Canelo because Canelos too well rounded,but I think offensive ggg at his best & with a lil better strategy (especially if trained by Hill)he could continue to convince many ppl he won & maybe would even get the ko by going all out blitz,but Canelo imo will have easy work vs Banks trained ggg,ggg will never be anything but a great pressure/power fighter who relies on athleticism as much as a great jab,but who has average defense To me he should accept that & use it to the fullest it will take him,til wheels fall off sorta speak, he's won't be unbeatable like he used to be vs lower tiers but only .1% of fighters ever have stretches where they seem unbeatable,imho if ggg had just honed his skills & stayed the same only Canelo beats him at mw,he would still be a favorite imo over 99% Really spot on analysis

Sugar hill imho is a much better trainer because Banks plays it safety 1st & SH plays it offense 1st which is exactly what ggg needs,he should never have been dumb enough to think he can become Canelo late in his career. Before Canelo he would say defensive fighters were pvssies after Canelo he despite saying he won, decided to do a complete 180 on everything he ever stood for or fought like. Just my "biased" 2 cents, Btw I think ggg can never beat CURRENT Canelo because Canelos too well rounded,but I think offensive ggg at his best & with a lil better strategy (especially if trained by Hill)he could continue to convince many ppl he won & maybe would even get the ko by going all out blitz,but Canelo imo will have easy work vs Banks trained ggg,ggg will never be anything but a great pressure/power fighter who relies on athleticism as much as a great jab,but who has average defense To me he should accept that & use it to the fullest it will take him,til wheels fall off sorta speak, he's won't be unbeatable like he used to be vs lower tiers but only .1% of fighters ever have stretches where they seem unbeatable,imho if ggg had just honed his skills & stayed the same only Canelo beats him at mw,he would still be a favorite imo over 99% Oh yeah Sugar Hill > Banks for sure. I agree.

I wonder if it's not from Golovkin having ties with K2 and Wladimir. Could be where the suggestion came from. Sugar hill imho is a much better trainer because Banks plays it safety 1st & SH plays it offense 1st which is exactly what ggg needs,he should never have been dumb enough to think he can become Canelo late in his career. Before Canelo he would say defensive fighters were pvssies after Canelo he despite saying he won, decided to do a complete 180 on everything he ever stood for or fought like. Just my "biased" 2 cents, Btw I think ggg can never beat CURRENT Canelo because Canelos too well rounded,but I think offensive ggg at his best & with a lil better strategy (especially if trained by Hill)he could continue to convince many ppl he won & maybe would even get the ko by going all out blitz,but Canelo imo will have easy work vs Banks trained ggg,ggg will never be anything but a great pressure/power fighter who relies on athleticism as much as a great jab,but who has average defense To me he should accept that & use it to the fullest it will take him,til wheels fall off sorta speak, he's won't be unbeatable like he used to be vs lower tiers but only .1% of fighters ever have stretches where they seem unbeatable,imho if ggg had just honed his skills & stayed the same only Canelo beats him at mw,he would still be a favorite imo over 99%

^^ ok fa-git I didnt ask that. learn how to read I wonder if it's not from Golovkin having ties with K2 and Wladimir. Could be where the suggestion came from.

^^ ok fa-git I didnt ask that. learn how to read

i think sugar is better overall maybe GGG can still use sugar hill at some point. It not the trainer, it’s GGG! GGG’s only goal is money and preservation fights till the big trilogy. He’s not interested in changing anything or listening to anyone. Legacy does not matter to him and Banks is just a tool GGG is using for the media