Better win? Fury over Klitschko, Kovalev over Hopkins?

" I quoted you " is semantics and you know it. I just did it. It was clever? Because I'm proven. I know you, IRL, I know a bunch of you. Sad little people who think twisting words and playing semantics is confusing and takes some kind of mental capability. It's a victory for a man who has none. I can show my ass all day here, be the dumbest poster in the ***** with the lowest class vocabulary and horrid grammatical skills and I am still a much more proven intellectual than you will ever be, and, I have been since I was nineteen. It's like bait for seeing who gives a **** about substance and who cares about form. It's a dumbass test, dumbass. For a surface dwelling ****. I did say, right away, soon as you quoted me, ****, I have to carry this for us. Nothing has changed. Look at me carrying this ****. I said Krusher has a better resume, you've been crying ever since...trying to shove meaning in, force it be have implications...you're not slick. Not one single name from Wlad's resume has been posted from you as a response to me.....who do you think you're being slick with? Bunch of illiterate *******s who can't read beyond a three lined post? Surely my goal is to reach those ****s...hmm? C'mon son, you're a ****ing embarrassment to trolling at this point. So which one was a better win? Fury over Klitschko or Kovalev over Hopkins? :lol1:

Fury over Klitschko and the two wins aren’t even comparable at all. Wait what.. but Marchegiano told me that Kovalev over hopkins was better than anything Wlad did in his entire career :tragedy:

I done told you I chimed in amid a conversation that wasn't mine. :lol1: What does comparing Sergey to Wlad have to do with comparing Sergey to Tyson or Wlad to Hopkins? :lol1: Yes, that thread is about Ward and Fury, and yes people were comparing Ward's resume to Fury's resume. I spoke to Sergey's resume compared to Wlad's lack of resume. You made a thread about Hopkins because I claimed his old ass is a better win than any of Wlad's. That's Wlad's wins not Fury's. Next thing I know you've this dumbass thread. I didn't even claim Hopkins is Sergey's best win, just better than Wlad's best wins. You don't see the leap there? Really? I think you do. I think you're a bit slow and don't realize what you call wit is really obvious and clumsy. I quoted you my man. You came into a conversation about Fury vs Ward and said Kovalev was a better win than Wlad because he beat a 50 year old hopkins and Wlad beat no one :lol1: hush now little boy. I don't know how anyone who uses the phrase "I done told you" could ever think of calling someone else slow. Hilarious.

Clearly Fury over Klitschko, I don't see how anyone can argue otherwise This x99999999999999999 :beerchug:

fury by a mile. bhop was beyond washed, shows how garbage pascal is. wlad still had lots left in the tank, he just got beat physiologically.

It's plain and clear to anyone with a brain you misunderstood me then doubled down from there. If you want to compare Krusher and Wlad's resume I'm game. Outside of that, what the **** are you doing? Making yourself feel better about being so stupid and emotional? You already compared Kovalev and Wlad, in a thread about Fury and Ward. I guess that wasn't to determine which of those wins were better :lol1: I'm so emotional right now. haha.

I mean, I offered the entire quote trail. It isn't hard to see every post I've made on the subject. Nor is it difficult to recognize I didn't mention Tyson at all. I said Krusher has a better resume than Wlad....why the **** do I give a **** about how you took that? Off you pop ya sad, illiterate, goofball. :lol1: backtracking. embarrassing. You said kovalev was a better win for ward because he beat bhop, than klitschko was for fury because he beat no one. and you were talking ****.

Quote where I brought it up. It's not even a good flip, a good flip would be is klitschko a better win for Fury than Krusher is for Dre, but, you're ****ing dumb so whatever. I write because I'm capable....dumb****. Yes you did fuking bring it up :lol1: You literally was the first person who started saying "does Klitschko even have as good a win as Seregey over Hopkins, so how could he be a better win for fury " that's literally what you said little man Krusher may not have much time under his belt on top, but, he whooped B-Hop and Wlad whooped no one....Even Alien version of Hopkins dwarfs Wlad's entire resume. Throw in the losses and wtf did Wlad do that compares to Sergey :lol1: dumbest idiot i've ever come across. Go and get your highschool degree.

Gotta give this one to the woman-puncher, Sergey Kovalev. True, Hopkins was basically a shell of himself that night, but at least he showed up to fight and take an L if he had to. In my 33 years of watching boxing, I don't know that I have ever seen a more shameful performance than Wladamiir Klitschko vs Tyson Fury.......or a more terrible fight to sit through for 12 rounds than that. Both fighters looked to timid, hesitant, and afraid to throw punches. Klitschko in particular looked as though it was his first day on the job, like he had forgotten all about how to fight and throw punches. For Furys part, he looked afraid to capitalize on any of Wlads hesitation. Just to big guys circling each others for 12 rounds, I am mad still to this day that was an hour of my life that I will never have back. Say what you like about Deontay Wilder, but at least his fans know he would never do that to them. Win or lose, he will go out swinging, and that's all anyone could ever ask - -Guess you never saw Ali vs the rusty, overweight prediabetic Buster Mathis. U boy went out trapped and frightened in a corner like Bambi. What grade U in now?

yes you did bring it up. Why do you need to write a full essay to avoid a simple question. ���������� ���������� Just in case you can’t read you dumb fugh

Wlad was closer to his prime than Hopkins. But that fight was one of the worst HW title fights of all time. Second only to Ruiz/Rahman.

because you're a ***** that's why Well said Wasn’t that hard to stump you Smfh

I responded to a guy saying Wlad is indubitably a better win than Sergey. I said it's debatable on the ground Wlad has no resume. You brought up Tyson Fury, I laughed at you, end of recap. No, I didn't. Quote me where I did. I brought up Hopkins over Wlad's resume. Wlad is a man on Fury's resume, not the other way around.....dumbass. The ****'s that got to do with resume? Man say has no resume You say 10 year reign WTF....is this the twilight zone? Offer a name Wlad beat, dumb ****. It's not hard. You're not doing anything until you do. Everything you've done takes way more effort than saying " I think Chris Byrd" or Povetkin, or Cheagev, or whatever the **** you think is a better than Sergey over Hopkins. I write long posts dripping with history for the most part....do you really think I now or ever gave a **** about goofy ****s who are either too stupid or too lazy to read a full paragraph? Eat a dick. You're not even close to my level son. Yes you did bring it up. Why do you need to write a full essay to avoid a simple question.

You could answer, ya know, if ya wasn't such a twink. What exactly do you think you're proving to me? Semantics? Propaganda? Why would I care? Compared to me you're useless. I already answered. You think beating a 50 year old man with multiple losses recently and without a KO in a decade or more was better beating the longest reigning heavyweight champ of the past century :lol1: That's enough answer.

Why the fugh do you need approval from others That’s what I keep asking myself Are you trying to convince yourself because you're a ***** that's why

I know, but you know how it is larry. some people have agendas and therefore just need to hear it from the masses. Some people seem to suggest that Wlad was waaaay over the hill despite looking his career best vs Joshua 16 months later :lol1: Apparently going 12 against Jennings proved that Wlad was done. Even though he went 12 with guys on similar level like Ibragivmov and Chambers (before the final ko) in the past. All because they don't want to give Fury his credit. Exactly. In Wlad's 10/11 year run, he went late/the distance many times. His Jennings performance was better than his Wach performance and Jennings is better than Wach. Their is absolutely nothing to suggest Wlad was best it vs Fury, and he was the better fight for 10/11 rounds against Joshua until he took that uppercut, which was the best punch of Joshua's career. Fury beat prime Wlad. I mean, what had Wlad lost? His speed and power were the same as ever, as well his style. He was just facing someone who was a bit bigger, a bit more skilled, with a lot more balls. Wlad was a great HW, a good win for anyone, but he is not as good as Fury.

I know, but you know how it is larry. some people have agendas and therefore just need to hear it from the masses. Some people seem to suggest that Wlad was waaaay over the hill despite looking his career best vs Joshua 16 months later :lol1: Apparently going 12 against Jennings proved that Wlad was done. Even though he went 12 with guys on similar level like Ibragivmov and Chambers (before the final ko) in the past. All because they don't want to give Fury his credit. Why the fugh do you need approval from others That’s what I keep asking myself Are you trying to convince yourself

This is the type of delusional people we're dealing with on a daily basis: wtf did Wlad do that compares to Sergey?. :lol1: How does a person even think of writing that sentence.

You are stupid trash I know what you are, but what am I :luvbed:

what an odd question I know, but you know how it is larry. some people have agendas and therefore just need to hear it from the masses. Wlad past his best? Based on what? It was 18 months before the best performance of his career against Joshua. Yeah he was 39 vs Fury, but one who had took little damage in over a decade, a heavyweight, and and in physical peak. It was PRIME Wlad Fury beat. Kovalev beat a decent but well past his best Hopkins who was 48/49. Some people seem to suggest that Wlad was waaaay over the hill despite looking his career best vs Joshua 16 months later :lol1: Apparently going 12 against Jennings proved that Wlad was done. Even though he went 12 with guys on similar level like Ibragivmov and Chambers (before the final ko) in the past. All because they don't want to give Fury his credit.