There is no evidence of the Farmer claim with Fury

“Notwithstanding the foregoing, Ms. Jimenez filed two email communications with no reliable, credible, or relevant supporting evidence in her defense, rather unfounded averments and allegations unsupported in the record.” eating wild boar testicles sounds alot like "unfounded averments and allegations unsupported in the record" tyson is in trouble. he used the statements of the farmer to give his defense of being caught validity. if the farmers statements are struck from the record what defense of popping for nandrolone does fury have:popcorn:

https://media.giphy.com/media/WmJABNxEV8CGI/giphy.gif

UK Anti-Doping reached a drug sanction settlement with Tyson Fury despite raising suspicions over a defence witness who now says he lied, sources close to the investigation say. Investigators uncovered claims in 2017 that Lancashire-based farmer Martin Carefoot had a licence to sell wild boar meat taken away by a local *authority. Ukad is now poised to reopen the investigation, and will examine whether Carefoot’s credibility as a witness was tested further at the time before world heavyweight champion Fury and his cousin, Hughie, received retrospective two-year bans. The Furys, who tested positive for the banned steroid nandrolone in 2015, blamed levels on eating uncastrated wild boar or contaminated supplements. Carefoot’s evidence was supplied to the watchdog via Fury’s legal team, but the boxer now says he had never met him....

By this logic, everyone who tests positive for Nandralone in innocent because "no one can be that stupid". lmao Some of them are that stupid. But when was the last time a world class athlete not called Fury got popped for nandrolone .. 1990's?

Yes, I know he failed the test after beating Hammer and I know that nandrolone is one of the oldest and most easily detected steroids out there. That's why I don't believe Fury used it deliberately when he knew he was going to be tested by UKAD. He is not that stupid and neither is his uncle Peter, who was his trainer back then. By this logic, everyone who tests positive for Nandralone in innocent because "no one can be that stupid". lmao

No, I'm saying that if his name is on the statement that means he might have supplied them with the meat or he might have been bribed to lie about it. All we have is a guy saying he was bribed by team Fury to sign a statement and no evidence one way or the other. If his name is on the statement that's evidence that he was involved with them, but it's not evidence that they bribed him. As far as I know he wasn’t paid. He didn’t get the money, thus why he is out here with the “Truth”. So anyone can believe what they want. The story was already ridiculous anyways. I never believed it. And I still don’t, the fact that they were given a backdated ban tells me they tried to bury UKAD, I know Fury was out for two years plus but did Hughie even serve that two years?

theres not irrefutable proof of this claim being true its literally he said/he said That's not true. If he actually submitted signed statements to Fury's attorney, who then presented them to UKAD for Fury's case as a witness for the defense - that's undeniable proof of his involvement in the case. Whether or not he was presented with a payoff to commit perjury is up for debate, but he hasn't revealed who it was. I doubt it was Fury himself. And a team member could have very well did it without Fury's knowledge. Of course, in any legal matter, it has to be taken serious (by UKAD and the British Board) when a key witness comes out and says he lied because the defense promised him money. Of course, it has to be investigated, but unless somebody from Team Fury bribed this guy in from of a credible witness - which is hardly likely - I can't see it turning out to be anything more than "he said, she said"

Lucky for you I searched on Fury and his nandrolone case. He failed a post fight after beating Hammer... There is also a long history of mixed martial artists failing drug tests for nandrolone metabolites. The list includes well known fighters like Josh Barnett, Royce Gracie, Nate Marquardt, Sean Sherk, Dennis Hallman, Joey Beltran, and even female fighter Carina Damm among others. It might be the single most commonly detected PED among mixed martial artists. That's why the UFC was forced to make a contract with USADA Yes, I know he failed the test after beating Hammer and I know that nandrolone is one of the oldest and most easily detected steroids out there. That's why I don't believe Fury used it deliberately when he knew he was going to be tested by UKAD. He is not that stupid and neither is his uncle Peter, who was his trainer back then.

So you are saying if his name is on the signed statement that meant he supplied them the meat? No, I'm saying that if his name is on the statement that means he might have supplied them with the meat or he might have been bribed to lie about it. All we have is a guy saying he was bribed by team Fury to sign a statement and no evidence one way or the other. If his name is on the statement that's evidence that he was involved with them, but it's not evidence that they bribed him.

Let's assume his name is on the witness statement, and it's there because he did supply wild boar meat to Team Fury, either directly or via a third person, just like he said he did back in 2016. That's one explanation, another is that he was bribed to sign the statements. So ... was he lying then, or is he lying now? What I'm saying is that we have no way of knowing. So you are saying if his name is on the signed statement that meant he supplied them the meat? That’s if he go by the witness statement, then the onus is on him to prove that he didn’t supply them the meat. Either way I never believed the Boar then and nothing is going to change that mindset, the fact that this farmer is coming out now because he didn’t get the “Promised” money shows me he is linked to them. The joint statement from his team trying to gloss over it is also telling. Like I said before this has more to do with UKAD if they have the resources to pursue a cold case, is not beneficial to anyone for them to, he has already served his ban.

Tyson Fury was juiced to the eyeballs. wild boar LMAOO thats worse than canelos cows excuse

Still buying the Wild Boar excuse LOL. Who the hell eats wild boar (other than athletes using it as an excuse to hide their PED usage)

The reason UKAD has reopened the case is because Team Fury were involved with the Farmer initially. If the Farmer is fictitious then the Farmer wouldn’t have been involved in the first place years ago. Fury will be fighting in the US from now on, like Canelo. And he's been cleared of PED abuse by the president of the WBC, like Canelo. He'll be getting his Franchise title soon, so fuck UKAD.

The situation is bigger than your silly bet. You’ve got every major news outlet covering UKAD’s new investigation. You’re a jinx. You're an irrational fool. And that's not an oxymoron.

Forget about the bribe, he obviously didn't get any money thats why he is coming out now, again his name shouldn't be anywhere near Team Fury's name. Why would his name be on any witness statement? I need someone to explain that to me. Even if UKAD doesn't do anything about it, it doesn't mean Team Fury are clean, i said it back in 2016 and i know that Wild boar excuse was horseshit then and i came back to bite them. Let's assume his name is on the witness statement, and it's there because he did supply wild boar meat to Team Fury, either directly or via a third person, just like he said he did back in 2016. That's one explanation, another is that he was bribed to sign the statements. So ... was he lying then, or is he lying now? What I'm saying is that we have no way of knowing.

I've already answered those questions. He could be linked to team Fury, and his name could be on those statements, that wouldn't mean that somebody from Team Fury bribed him. Forget about the bribe, he obviously didn't get any money thats why he is coming out now, again his name shouldn't be anywhere near Team Fury's name. Why would his name be on any witness statement? I need someone to explain that to me. Even if UKAD doesn't do anything about it, it doesn't mean Team Fury are clean, i said it back in 2016 and i know that Wild boar excuse was horseshit then and i came back to bite them.

Am not assuming anything, yes he is a known liar if we go back what he claimed. And like I said this is between UKAD and Team Fury, but fact is he shouldn’t be linked to Team Fury at all. Why would his name be on any witness statements at UKAD? I've already answered those questions. He could be linked to team Fury, and his name could be on those statements, that wouldn't mean that somebody from Team Fury bribed him.

You’ve been played all along. That’s the jinx that you are on this site. From BJS and Fury. I’m setting an example of your reasoning of exemptions. You cried Canelo and meat contamination yet you parade on NSB to claim Fury and BJS aren’t cheats or were never “charged.” I bet you read children books for the “The Adventures of the Uncastrated Wild T-Rex” That’s your end of the lesson. Now go shine my shoes. Are you up for the bet or not?

Once again any one of these excuses may have held some weight if they weren't preceded by dozens of other excuses since the fight took place. Fury tested clean for both Wilder fights and desperately trying to retroactively bust him for something from 2015 shows your obvious lack of faith in Wilder's ability to beat him.

“Loving hate” goes back to Shakespeare. “Uncastrated wild” You’re slow bruh. How about a friendly bet ... all of your points against all of mine that "uncastrated wild boar" is not an oxymoron? Of you're game, I'll google "oxymoron" and post the definition here. We can ask a mod to look at it and decide who wins the bet. Agreed?