YEP..... that's what i'm seeing on here and now being blocked from butt hurting people with truths.
Hate on Whyte, big up Ortiz and lets only talk about drug test failures for one fighter that suits the agenda and hope the audience is under 10 years old. LMFAO
Never-mind the people screaming "B-SAMPLE!!!" It's funny how they quickly forgot Pov's B-sample the ONLY time until Feb 22nd that Wilder was set to face someone with a pulse... look what happened... QUACK QUACK all the way to Alabama
Whyte and Ortiz cheated, YES ABHORRENT to say the least.
But no-one has ever been so proud of their tail feathers as one Deontay "The Mallard" Wilder
delete thread if applicable, DGAF
Because I’ve never said anything about Lamont Peterson? Okay Ray. Have a good night.
Yes because you spend more energy criticising genuine posters who across the board are more consistent than you. You pick and choose when you want to go on your drug testing crusade. Just like the rest of them.
It’s because you are a hypocrite. You really have nothing to offer. You are not criticising anyone for the benefit of boxing, you are doing so because of where you are aligned. Which means you are really muted. I want posters that can say “I criticise everyone” “I take everything into consideration” and I criticise across the board. You coming here trying to hold a torch like “British posters defending Whyte”... When British posters like myself were the first one that blast him and ask for a ban on him, not only that but we still bring up his gloves issues with Rivas... you lot come on here like you are the ones that criticise anyone without any bias..
Because I’ve never said anything about Lamont Peterson? Okay Ray. Have a good night.
I’ve never made a post about Lamont Peterson at all. Nothing boxing related. Nothing. He’s irrelevant..
It’s because you are a hypocrite. You really have nothing to offer. You are not criticising anyone for the benefit of boxing, you are doing so because of where you are aligned. Which means you are really muted. I want posters that can say “I criticise everyone” “I take everything into consideration” and I criticise across the board. You coming here trying to hold a torch like “British posters defending Whyte”... When British posters like myself were the first one that blast him and ask for a ban on him, not only that but we still bring up his gloves issues with Rivas... you lot come on here like you are the ones that criticise anyone without any bias..
Show us where you trashed Lamont Peterson. Show us where you trashed Charlie for missing their test. Show us how post you contributed to Ortiz failing his last drug test.
I’ve never made a post about Lamont Peterson at all. Nothing boxing related. Nothing. He’s irrelevant. But there’s quite a few posts from me bashing Charlo. I’m not digging through because you’re suddenly Dillian Whyte’s attorney though. Look for yourself.
You're right about that. There are a few people on here like myself who will trash everyone who fails a test.
Show us where you trashed Lamont Peterson. Show us where you trashed Charlie for missing their test. Show us how post you contributed to Ortiz failing his last drug test.
You're right. Whyte is clean. The fact that he pissed hot means nothing.
My mistake.
That’s your interpretation because you are a hypocrite like the rest of these lot. Again who are the people defending Whyte? It depends on which side of the coin you aligned yourself with. So going by your narrative Whyte was clean because he paid off everyone. Yeah very noble if you.
I didnt say defend I said their conveniently quiet which is true. You get people like ShaneMosley make 50 threads about Whyte and Joshua fighting in Saudi Arabia but Miller tests positive for multiple illegal substances and he doesnt say a word.
Canelo also failed a drugs test and was banned (unlike Whyte but gets no where near the same hate) why is that?
You're right about that. There are a few people on here like myself who will trash everyone who fails a test, but there are many who will try to sweep Canelo's two fails under the rug. Try mentioning Canelo failing a test, you'll get gangraped on here by Mexican nationalists until you're wondering how ten pages later you're defending GGG's resume.
And just block Shane lol. That's one guy. That's like me lumping all of you into Robbie Barrett's or DaNeutral's threads lol
And my only answer for people not talking about Miller is because (IMO) There's nothing to talk about. It was such a huge epic fail that there's no discussing it lol. He got off via technicality and it's bull****.
Not a single soul has defended Miller. Whyte gets brought up because of the cover up and the fact that there was zero punishment.
But for some reason, Eddie's kids on here love Whyte so much that they don't care about that, because Americans have pissed hot.
I didnt say defend I said their conveniently quiet which is true. You get people like ShaneMosley make 50 threads about Whyte and Joshua fighting in Saudi Arabia but Miller tests positive for multiple illegal substances and he doesnt say a word.
Canelo also failed a drugs test and was banned (unlike Whyte but gets no where near the same hate) why is that?
You're right. Whyte is clean. The fact that he pissed hot means nothing. The fact that he tested positive for DBol, and the fact that this was hidden from the Rivas camp, all of that means nothing. The fact that he failed a test years ago also means nothing. Whyte is a clean fighter. It's just a WBC conspiracy to keep him away from Wilder.
My mistake.
Don't forget Ortiz is clean too!!!!
Masking is not doping!
oh wait :-(
Ah, atleast Whytes got his B-sample that will save his grace, just like Povetk........
Oh ****ing wait again
(Dude, its the thread title FFS, don't fall in line with the douches)
So who are the ones defending Whyte on here? You want to quote facts, then let’s go by fact hey. Miller was caught injecting three drugs, denied it at first then came out with the mini-truth when caught red handed. So what is it to defend there?
Whyte was caught by UKAD (The same agent that is been accused of letting him off - Which shows lack of knowledge by a lot of these people), exonerated by VADA (An American based agent), but according to those that wanted to use it as a weapon it was “Whyte paid off the agents” etc
So anyone pointing to the facts that Whyte was exonerated by VADA/UKAD is now defending Whyte? Common!!! You cannot see the hypocrisy in that?
You're right. Whyte is clean. The fact that he pissed hot means nothing. The fact that he tested positive for DBol, and the fact that this was hidden from the Rivas camp, all of that means nothing. The fact that he failed a test years ago also means nothing. Whyte is a clean fighter. It's just a WBC conspiracy to keep him away from Wilder.
My mistake.
Not a single soul has defended Miller. Whyte gets brought up because of the cover up and the fact that there was zero punishment.
But for some reason, Eddie's kids on here love Whyte so much that they don't care about that, because Americans have pissed hot.
So who are the ones defending Whyte on here? You want to quote facts, then let’s go by fact hey. Miller was caught injecting three drugs, denied it at first then came out with the mini-truth when caught red handed. So what is it to defend there?
Whyte was caught by UKAD (The same agent that is been accused of letting him off - Which shows lack of knowledge by a lot of these people), exonerated by VADA (An American based agent), but according to those that wanted to use it as a weapon it was “Whyte paid off the agents” etc
So anyone pointing to the facts that Whyte was exonerated by VADA/UKAD is now defending Whyte? Common!!! You cannot see the hypocrisy in that?
Great post.
I will probably have been hypocritical in certain cases in the past also. But I think its important that if you see yourself doing it, you should look at yourself and improve your attitude regarding it. We should all take a leaf in life, learn and love.
Although I certainly don't fanboy over any fighter, boxing is all I ever fanboy over. Oh yeah and pssing off morons who won't even acknowledge a sensible discussion (not you good sir).
But you are absolutely right, ever case is different and due to boxing politics some people appear to get away with just about anything depending on their standing (or their promoters) in the sport.
It's a sad truth.
That’s all we could do, reflect and learn not be too hypocritical.
Dont forget to include Miller, the same people making 50 threads about Whyte are conveniently very quiet when Miller's name is mentioned and he's the worst of the lost.
Not a single soul has defended Miller. Whyte gets brought up because of the cover up and the fact that there was zero punishment.
But for some reason, Eddie's kids on here love Whyte so much that they don't care about that, because Americans have pissed hot.
I've never seen anyone on this site defend Miller. Please post quotes from those people. I remember this site being united in that instance when Miller popped dirty
Very, very good point.
Perhaps Miller has never suited applicable narratives?
I have no clue, I thought Miller had a "following" of sorts, but (compared to other situations) if one man got hung to (deservedly) dry by the fans and look silly for it, it was Miller... But considering his short ban, the "powers that be" must have a plan for him.
Whyte, was a very questionable situation to say the least.
Ortiz, was in a caught red handed scenario but again questions (IE masking)
Both now held in high regards by either set of fanboy creating the most vile hypocrites this site has ever seen.
I'll never say "poor Miller", ****er deserved more
I just can't get my head around some calling certain fighters to be publicly flogged while ignoring (and defending) others that suit their narrative... It's amazingly shallow, obvious, embarrassing and down right silly.
Thankyou for your input, all the very best RC.
Dont forget to include Miller, the same people making 50 threads about Whyte are conveniently very quiet when Miller's name is mentioned and he's the worst of the lost.
I've never seen anyone on this site defend Miller. Please post quotes from those people. I remember this site being united in that instance when Miller popped dirty
I hate all drug cheats, in this day and age it is difficult to know who actually cheated. I know every individual case is different like Whyte and canelo and Miller. But everyone also gets treated differently depends on which side of the coin you go with.
That's why you see the PBC cultist, crying about Whyte and accusing the same drug agents, who had an adverse findings in his samples of being paid off, even though VADA theory was what was used to get him off, whilst they totally ignore Miller, that's why you have the meat contamination validation with Canelo.
At the end of the day, every single of us are hypocrites. Our agendas is quite written in all our posts. I see people here celebrating Mosley the other day, Lamont Pederson etc I see them silent about Miller getting off scot-free, but they are quick to cry over Whyte and we all know why.
Great post.
I will probably have been hypocritical in certain cases in the past also. But I think its important that if you see yourself doing it, you should look at yourself and improve your attitude regarding it. We should all take a leaf in life, learn and love.
Although I certainly don't fanboy over any fighter, boxing is all I ever fanboy over. Oh yeah and pssing off morons who won't even acknowledge a sensible discussion (not you good sir).
But you are absolutely right, ever case is different and due to boxing politics some people appear to get away with just about anything depending on their standing (or their promoters) in the sport.
It's a sad truth.
because one is the opponent of a darling, the other is the darling?
you get that, right? you guys love dillian whyte. for whatever reason.
you're screaming about a wilder opponent taking drugs. whyte himself took the drugs. twice. second time was f#cking dianabol.
I hate all drug cheats, in this day and age it is difficult to know who actually cheated. I know every individual case is different like Whyte and canelo and Miller. But everyone also gets treated differently depends on which side of the coin you go with.
That's why you see the PBC cultist, crying about Whyte and accusing the same drug agents, who had an adverse findings in his samples of being paid off, even though VADA theory was what was used to get him off, whilst they totally ignore Miller, that's why you have the meat contamination validation with Canelo.
At the end of the day, every single of us are hypocrites. Our agendas is quite written in all our posts. I see people here celebrating Mosley the other day, Lamont Pederson etc I see them silent about Miller getting off scot-free, but they are quick to cry over Whyte and we all know why.
No I did not expect a response, I expected childish name calling and that's what I got :-)
Good going big man!
PMSL
Go back to your Wilder jerk threads where you can ignore those who pose opinions against your own!
Nonce.........