Who can Pacquiao beat and will receive full credit for the W?
I can hear a lot of haters with their excuses. Seems like he wouldn't get credit if he beat these fighters:
Crawford ("didn't look good in his last fight and got dropped by Kav")
Spence ("wasn't the same after the car crash")
Canelo for a 160 belt ("he's a 175 fighter")
the woman beater *Floyd ("he's been retired")
So are there any other fighters out there who Pacquiao can beat and get full credit for the win?
Thanks, man. That's very generous of you - I appreciate that. The book itself is getting released Jan 15, so I was going to make a post about it then.
If you're interested in reading more excerpts from the book, they've been published online in various literary journals. See some here , here, and here.
Yeah, I saw the release date... and I guess it does make most sense for you to do it yourself then.
And the very best of luck to you, I read a lot, man, and I think you got a unusual talent there.
Regards
K
For want of somewhere better to do it I wanna say how impressed I am with your writing, man, or at least the small excerpt that's available on the Press 53 site. Evocative, vivid and tightly controlled... wholly unlike my word splurges.:lol1:
Do I have your permission to reproduce that excerpt here for the perusal of NSB or you rather not?
Thanks, man. That's very generous of you - I appreciate that. The book itself is getting released Jan 15, so I was going to make a post about it then.
If you're interested in reading more excerpts from the book, they've been published online in various literary journals. See some here , here, and here.
He only hasn’t gotten credit recently and for good reason. Thurman is shot, Broner is shot and Matthysse was shot.
He’s still very impressive for someone his age.
trolls are everywhere :slap:
Fight fans think whatever they think. You can't stop them from being unfair and unreasonable if they want to. Some would give him full credit for those wins and some would not.
Boxing commentators: Welterweight is the most stacked division right now.
Forum posters: ALL WELTERWEIGHTS ARE SHOT.
For want of somewhere better to do it I wanna say how impressed I am with your writing, man, or at least the small excerpt that's available on the Press 53 site. Evocative, vivid and tightly controlled... wholly unlike my word splurges.:lol1:
Do I have your permission to reproduce that excerpt here for the perusal of NSB or you rather not?
No. THe standards for Pac are too high to get any credit. Floyd beats green fighters with CW and gets credit. Beats former flyweights whist using IV fluids gets credit whilst taking a 5 year break.
Yet he schooled your boyfriend 10-2. :lol1:
If Pac looks like he did against Thurman but loses...I think he will still be respected as a top fighter.
As long as he doesn't get old in 1 night like B HOP.
Farmers, food vendors and peasants.....No getting around that
Floyd could have fought thurman, spence and crawford from 2015 to 2020. But dodged them all.
Guys who beat Pac can't be given props but should Pac win.....almost not worth fighting Pac.
Biggest payday of that fighters career though and a PPV event
Peasants, farmers and food vendors are who Pac fought his 1st 40 opponents.
40 fights, that's like a whole career.
The irony of Floyd fans Pac just beat the man Floyd ducked at 36 years of age at nearly 41.
Like I say the standards for pac are too high to get credit.
Its very simple fighters with no asterisk is only Crawford and Porter, then Spence has the car crash hanging over him, then Garcia who is on the slide and given 2 B grade wins to prop him up.
I think Manny will fight Danny Garcia he is the easiest, the biggest props would be Crawford but I dont see that fight happening.
Just no more of this injured fighters BS.
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/xmFqupChQHU/maxresdefault.jpg
If pac beats someone these muthaf#ckas will say
the typical excuse
the opponents were weight drained
the opponents were shot
pacquiao is using steroids , no vada testing.
the opponents became old overnight.
they fighting at catchweight.
He’s beyond needing credit and the fact that you entertain anyone that doesn’t give him credit means either you are antagonizing their favorite fighter or you just in to deep. I think you’re someone that ****s on other fighters while praising another, forcing bull**** arguments.
Anyone who's been active and has some power would be a start. I know, Pac is old. He should be in his cruise control part of his career. Same problem GGG fans have.
Pac wasted his WW career fighting stiffs. Look at the names. Pitiful to say the least.
Then he spends a good deal of time on 2 guys. 1 1/2 years spent on Bradley, 2 years spent on JMM.
Only a Pacfiend can be so forgiving
Atleast it's much better than flpyd ww career..
Danny has a fight this month so we will see...DG is a easy win
DG has an interesting, flat footed counter punching style where he slips punches and shoots his shots at the same time as the other fighter. And he has power.
I think if DG beats Pacquiao then everyone says HE beat an old guy.
Boxing commentators: Welterweight is the most stacked division right now.
Forum posters: ALL WELTERWEIGHTS ARE SHOT.
It's because that the 41 years old part time boxer is about to fight them.. lmao..
I said it’s impressive for someone his age. It is. But they’re all shot.
Pac is shot and almost everyone u said are more in prime than pac, it's just pac skill is in different level..
PBC commentators think welterweight is the best division because they have a lot of welterweights.
Fair.
Also, I really need to learn to start putting some emojis in when I'm trying to be funny.