Why you don't think AJ v Ruiz was a good fight

People need to acknowledge something on here. They don't like to see a favourite dominate a fight. We all love a fight where the momentum swings. That's what Wilder v Fury did. That's what Wilder v Ortiz 1 did That's what Ruiz v Joshua 1 did in a single compelling round. Then we all love a fight where the underdog has some success. That's another tick for Wilder v Fury (remember where Fury was coming from at that time), Wilder v Ortiz 2, Joshua v Ruiz 1. It makes good entertainment because it's drama. In a boxing sense, though, none of those performances were particularly good. None of them were particularly aggressive. The technical displays weren't elite - far from it in some cases. Forget about whether you rate Ruiz for a second, Joshua v Ruiz never had the drama of the fights I mentioned. And that's why you didn't enjoy it as much. Joshua dominated the fight. He put on a more dominant display then anything that was seen in the other fights I mentioned. I get why that makes it less of an interesting fight, but tell me, why would that make Joshua's performance less impressive? The sense I get is that he would have got far more credit if he'd made a few more mistakes, lost a few more rounds and finished it in the twelfth when he landed those last few big shots because he couldn't be sure of a points win. That would make it a much better fight, and a much less impressive performance from Joshua.