Inoue for me. Right now there's nothing negative to say about this kid. He has accepted every challenge the people want him to face, he won them all and culminated with a breathtaking championship fight against a legend in the sport in Donaire to ultimately win the Muhammad Ali trophy. Just a beautiful year.
Nah man. Not just any 40 year but a freak of nature, a legend, an ATG.You got it! His performance was highly impressive. At times he looked like a fighter who was ten years younger. Which is why he gets my pick over Canelo every time.
Which is very true; However, Thurman was still challenging a forty and one half year old fighter at the time. Therefore, I have to give Pac full credit for that victory.
Nah man. Not just any 40 year but a freak of nature, a legend, an ATG.
The difference between Canelo and Wilder is that Wilder defeated a man who has never been defeated before until he fought him and his only two losses came from the same man who fought him twice; Deontay wilder. In addition, he has been avoided for most of his career. While Canelo defeated a man who already had two losses on his record in Daniel Jacobs.
I view Jacobs as an equal, maybe better, challenge as Ortiz.
Thurman can also be critique for not be %100 after a long lay off.
Which is very true; However, Thurman was still challenging a forty and one half year old fighter at the time. Therefore, I have to give Pac full credit for that victory.
Hell no to Canelo, fought ONE fighter he was supposed to fight in Jacob. No one asked for no damn Kov fight which was a cherry pick, when BETTER competition was out there for him to fight.
Smh at being impressed by a cheery picked fight.
He beat Jacobs that should get him on your list if Wilder gets on it.The difference between Canelo and Wilder is that Wilder defeated a man who has never been defeated before until he fought him and his only two losses came from the same man who fought him twice; Deontay wilder. In addition, he has been avoided for most of his career. While Canelo defeated a man who already had two losses on his record in Daniel Jacobs.
You know what's the main difference between Canelo Alvarez and Manny Pacquiao? Pac defeats younger men while Canelo defeats older ones. Pac makes my list because at forty and one half years old he defeated a much younger fighter ten years his junior who was also undefeated.
While Canelo defeated a much older fighter almost ten years his senior who was well beyond his best and past his prime. I am sorry but you don't get browning points from me for beating up older men.
Thurman can also be critique for not be %100 after a long lay off.
You know what's the main difference between Canelo Alvarez and Manny Pacquiao? Pac defeats younger men while Canelo defeats older ones. Pac makes my list because at forty and one half years old he defeated a much younger fighter ten years his junior who was also undefeated.
While Canelo defeated a much older fighter almost ten years his senior who was well beyond his best and past his prime. I am sorry but you don't get browning points from me for beating up older men.
I don't know. It seems close but Canelo gets the edge for Jacobs and Kovalev.
But Pac started at flyweight. How can it be a cherry pick fighting natural WW who's undefeated young lion?I
Floyd should fight Ggg next. Ggg didn't look good. Should be easy for floyd
Folks have ceilings. WW is both the ceiling for Pac and May. It's not where you start, it's where you finish.
Why no Canelo?You know what's the main difference between Canelo Alvarez and Manny Pacquiao? Pac defeats younger men while Canelo defeats older ones. Pac makes my list because at forty and one half years old he defeated a much younger fighter ten years his junior who was also undefeated.
While Canelo defeated a much older fighter almost ten years his senior who was well beyond his best and past his prime. I am sorry but you don't get browning points from me for beating up older men.
Keep it consistent. Stick to WW. Pacquiao has not fought MW or SM.
But Pac started at flyweight. How can it be a cherry pick fighting natural WW who's undefeated young lion?I
Floyd should fight Ggg next. Ggg didn't look good. Should be easy for floyd
I don't give credit to those who beat up old, low risk, washed up cherry pick fighters like Canelo.
I was far from impressed by his Kovalev victory because I both called it and anticipated it. He took the fight because Sergei's skills were diminished and on the decline.
If Kov was prime, at full strength and at his physical peak Canelo would have never fought him; Let alone go within a 100 feet of him.
He beat Jacobs that should get him on your list if Wilder gets on it.
Why no Canelo?I don't give credit to those who beat up old, low risk, washed up cherry pick fighters like Canelo.
I was far from impressed by his Kovalev victory because I both called it and anticipated it. He took the fight because Sergei's skills were diminished and on the decline.
If Kov was prime, at full strength and at his physical peak Canelo would have never fought him; Let alone go within a 100 feet of him.
The only way it's be a cherry pick for a 23 year, 71 fight veteran at 41, who floyd, crawford, spence ducked is because the standards for pac are too high. Thurman was favourite until everyone started betting on Pac to win.
If beating people coming off poor last performances is so easy why do n t Floyd fight Ggg right now.? In fact why don't Floyd fight callum Smith in next fight? Callum looked a bit overrated in.last fight. Surely Floyd could beat him. Only problem is, Floyd won't get credit as it would be deemed a cherry pick by your logic?
Keep it consistent. Stick to WW. Pacquiao has not fought MW or SM.