Basically, unlike Hearn's saying Whyte will reveal all today, he merely said he won fair and can't say more "for good legal reasons."
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/boxing/article-7289507/Dillian-Whyte-breaks-silence-testing-positive-banned-drug.html
It's all so corrupt.
It wouldn't surprise me if they either lose B sample, or just release bogus data. And only the perps will know and some of them might have an accident...
Joshua has looked like that before but has always been able to bail himself out with a big punch. Joshua landed some big punches but Ruiz didn't fold. If Wlad or Povetkin could have absorbed what Joshua was dishing out, they likely would have beaten a very exhausted Joshua also.
Wlad and Povetkin fought a much better version of AJ though, both hit considerably harder and both did ship some big shots onto AJ. AJ never got his footing back under him after he got put down, he wasn't himself it was like a shell of his former self. If that version of AJ was fighting Povetkin or Wlad, of course both of them would have won.
I'm certain Ortiz would have laid AJ out as well yeah a lot of the top 10 guys would have, I dunno what seemed wrong with AJ but put it this way he has been hit with way bigger punchers and never fell apart like that. Maybe he is starting to pass his best years or he just had an off night, it does happens.
Joshua has looked like that before but has always been able to bail himself out with a big punch. Joshua landed some big punches but Ruiz didn't fold. If Wlad or Povetkin could have absorbed what Joshua was dishing out, they likely would have beaten a very exhausted Joshua also.
I'm certain Ortiz would have laid AJ out as well yeah a lot of the top 10 guys would have, I dunno what seemed wrong with AJ but put it this way he has been hit with way bigger punchers and never fell apart like that. Maybe he is starting to pass his best years or he just had an off night, it does happens.
Well it could be that shot near the top of the head he took, takes longer to recover than on the chin.
In the immortal words of Mike Tyson, "I think it was spinal."
But Joshua does not have the best chin and with age now, he could be done at the top level due to inability to take a punch.
In rematch, should Ruiz aim for top of head and not chin?
No biggie.
Of course, an Ortiz-Joshua fight might well have had the same result the Ruiz fight did.
I'm certain Ortiz would have laid AJ out as well yeah a lot of the top 10 guys would have, I dunno what seemed wrong with AJ but put it this way he has been hit with way bigger punchers and never fell apart like that. Maybe he is starting to pass his best years or he just had an off night, it does happens.
Yeah my bad, I had a feeling I had the name wrong there but it sounded very Mexican so I thought you never know.
No biggie.
Of course, an Ortiz-Joshua fight might well have had the same result the Ruiz fight did.
I agree with you.
But you meant Ruiz right?
Yeah my bad, I had a feeling I had the name wrong there but it sounded very Mexican so I thought you never know.
Yeah, lot of avoiding the true details the questions we want answered never get a straight answer. It's like that Mueller hearing, uh uh uh I can't say that you'll have to ask someone else.
Two metabolites of Dbol to me that is the proof right there that he is a cheat, we already know there is a lot of cheaters in boxing. What annoys me as well is the fact that we have British people treating this like we should defend him, this isn't quite the same as innocent until proven guilty because his A-sample failed lol. We can draw our conclusion from that, Hearn told us to wait for Whyte to comment before we cast our judgement... well his Tweet today was half arsed.
Matchroom will be totally f'd if Ortiz KO's Joshua again.
I agree with you.
But you meant Ruiz right?
They're throwing it back to or at each other.
Does it seem like a sinking ship now?
Yeah, lot of avoiding the true details the questions we want answered never get a straight answer. It's like that Mueller hearing, uh uh uh I can't say that you'll have to ask someone else.
Two metabolites of Dbol to me that is the proof right there that he is a cheat, we already know there is a lot of cheaters in boxing. What annoys me as well is the fact that we have British people treating this like we should defend him, this isn't quite the same as innocent until proven guilty because his A-sample failed lol. We can draw our conclusion from that, Hearn told us to wait for Whyte to comment before we cast our judgement... well his Tweet today was half arsed.
Matchroom will be totally f'd if Ortiz KO's Joshua again.
Yea but the public didn't know. As long as the public didn't know then Whyte could put out a vague statement making it seem like it was recreational.
Gotchya...
Listening to your lawyers is exactly what you do when you're guilty... Kudos to Whyte for admitting it...
Yeah I recall in Watergate, Woodward and Bernstein called this
a "non-denial denial".
Like you wrote, only the guilty.
Yeah, I didn't hold a lot of hope when he said Whyte would go into it further. The guy has rocks for brains, not a very smart guy at all and he really didn't tell us much at all. Should have just let Hearn take the wrap for him which im sure he wanted him to do in the first place.
They're throwing it back to or at each other.
Does it seem like a sinking ship now?
How should people react?
Summary;
Yesterday: Hearn, paraphrasing: Whyte's innocent, 1 million per cent. I could tell you much more now, but tmow Whyte will explain it, so wait for that.
Next day : Whyte: My lawyers said I shouldn't say anything,
Yeah, I didn't hold a lot of hope when he said Whyte would go into it further. The guy has rocks for brains, not a very smart guy at all and he really didn't tell us much at all. Should have just let Hearn take the wrap for him which im sure he wanted him to do in the first place.