Where would you rank Pacquiao all time if....?

If Spence doesn't look good against Porter, I'm pretty sure they will only downgrage Manny's win on Spence. If Spence (vs Porter) looked like Foreman knocking out Frazier, then Manny becomes Boxing Zeus if he defeats that version of Spence. this right here.. that's the pattern on here.. once upon a time, keith thurman was view as the best ww on here.

I have him personally top 20 at #17

GrandPac would be #5-7 of the ATG list if he beat Spence-Porter winner... I currently rank him at around #8-10... Dunno why TBE (not The Best Ever) is even mentioned here... But I currently rank him at around #25-30...

Manny not top 10??? Let’s take a look wins over Larios Barrera 2x Morales 2x Marquez Hatton Bradley Mosley Maragarito Cotto Dlh(old weight drained I know) Mattyhsse Thurman at 40 Fukin yrs old That resume is ridiculous and please let’s not nit pick opponents cuz trust I will easily be able to do that with any top 10 fighter on you’re list. Now please tell me you’re too 10 and let’s compare those resumes? I’ve been around boxing a long time huge fan of the old timers and I know it’s difficult in boxing for the new greats to surpass the old greats but guys like manny are the exception he’s clearly top 10 but I also know the media is totally biased towards black and white fighters(we all know that) but manny is a rare breed he fuuckks with any guys in the top 10 all time. And I’m no Filipino. you are insane if you think Pac is a top 10 ATG that is ridiculous btw... wherever Pac is, Floyd is higher... and he is not top 10 either

I got Pac already Top 10 All Time

Hopkins..... after setting a world record for title defences at middleweight..... became a GENUINE world champion at 46yo keywords..... " GENUINE " ..... " 46yo " he also added other good/excellent wins after 40yo and yet..... Hopkins is not ranked in the top 20 pacfans do not rate him at all LMAO you guys need to stop leap-frogging Pac over GREAT fighters simply because he beat Thurman lol if Pac beat Crawford at 147 I would be REALLY impressed that would put him really close to top 20 then imho The thing with bh is though he started boxing late and his 20 title defenses werent really appreciated at the time as they were smaller and names that didn't impress. Bh impressed people by mostly what he did at advanced age. But I rate bh similar to I rate floyd giving floydvedge Whilst Pac s been doing it from 19 against the who's who and more often than not doing business. Pac had a few hiccups mainly because he was work in progress learning trade on job.

Pac is already top 3 but if he is an american he's already been a goat since 2009...

Pac s top 5 already. Some thinks he's goat already. If he beats spence even.more will think Pac s goat than they already do. I'm on fence at the moment though.

Hopkins..... after setting a world record for title defences at middleweight..... became a GENUINE world champion at 46yo keywords..... " GENUINE " ..... " 46yo " he also added other good/excellent wins after 40yo and yet..... Hopkins is not ranked in the top 20 pacfans do not rate him at all LMAO you guys need to stop leap-frogging Pac over GREAT fighters simply because he beat Thurman lol if Pac beat Crawford at 147 I would be REALLY impressed that would put him really close to top 20 then imho

If Spence doesn't look good against Porter, I'm pretty sure they will only downgrage Manny's win on Spence. If Spence (vs Porter) looked like Foreman knocking out Frazier, then Manny becomes Boxing Zeus if he defeats that version of Spence.

If he beats Spence, he'll basically be Boxing Jesus. Defeating Floyd won't do much for his legacy. Beating a retired 42 year old who fights japanese sushi chefs with insecurity issues isn't really that impressive. yep that is why nobody wants to see Canelo/Golovkin again

Surefire opinion but IMO I have Pacquiao at #32 all time ever fighters but beating a Spence/Porter winner at age 41 would be in the mythical realms and pushes him to 20 or Possibly #19! There are some really mythical legends on the all time lists! Floyd behind Pacman? It’s true Pacman has fought absolutely everyone and everything and done it all! He’s at a point where he’s just either adding or/and adding to his all time legacy! Floyd is #30 Pacman would surpass Floyd if he does the unthinkable which now seems to not be so impossible after what he did to a prime undefeated welterweight champ who was considered the best at 147! it is very difficult to determine, even for knowledgeable professionals I agree with just about everything you have said, in both posts your viewpoint is far more accurate than most others imho also..... I know Floyd is great, I am not hating on him..... but beating Spence would actually be more impressive than beating Floyd at this point..... not necessarily because of Floyd's age, but because of his inactivity #theynevercomeback Spence is a bad boy if Pac really wants to be let off the leash, he should look at Spence..... not sure who would win out of Spence/Crawford, but Spence is a more-winnable fight for Pac due to style that would be an excellent win..... much better than Thurman, who does not look like the same fighter imo

If Pacman were to somehow beat Spence/Porter winner next year or beat Floyd in a rematch then where would you personally rank him as a all time great? I would say he would be top 25 or top 20 all time fighters ever if he gets the task done in those extreme difficulties of goals! I think that would be pretty close Pac is not currently top 20... aside from the recent murmurings Floyd is close to that people who rank those guys in the top 10 are fkn morons

If he beats Spence, he'll basically be Boxing Jesus. Defeating Floyd won't do much for his legacy. Beating a retired 42 year old who fights japanese sushi chefs with insecurity issues isn't really that impressive.

Pac is already top 20. Floyd isnt far behind Pac. Surefire opinion but IMO I have Pacquiao at #32 all time ever fighters but beating a Spence/Porter winner at age 41 would be in the mythical realms and pushes him to 20 or Possibly #19! There are some really mythical legends on the all time lists! Floyd behind Pacman? It’s true Pacman has fought absolutely everyone and everything and done it all! He’s at a point where he’s just either adding or/and adding to his all time legacy! Floyd is #30 Pacman would surpass Floyd if he does the unthinkable which now seems to not be so impossible after what he did to a prime undefeated welterweight champ who was considered the best at 147!