What do you guys think?
Stylistically and skill wise they’re both different but they share a similar career path. Pac was a wild, offensive beast in his younger years, like Duran. Both heavily improved on their skills and defense to become more well rounded. Both also moved up many weight classes and fought the very best fighters, took some bad losses along the way to the point that many didn’t think that they had anymore in the tank. Both were also heavily underestimated and still gave scintillating performances against good fighters even while past their prime.
Pacquiao, I think, has earned the right to be mentioned in the same breathe as other past ATGs such as Roberto Duran. Probably not as great as Duran but pretty damn close.
I will just say that Duran started his pro career at lightweight and finished it at 168.
Because I see debate Duran would do this, Duran would do that..
When you discuss if Duran could have beaten Floyd Mayweather jr. you must determine which version of Duran are you talking about and which version of Floyd.
A lightweight Duran was a monster, he was also great at 147.
{"alt":"Click image for larger version Name:\tCEDrDiGUMAANRqg?format=jpg&name=small.jpg Views:\t0 Size:\t62.4 KB ID:\t30993750","data-align":"none","data-attachmentid":"30993750","data-size":"full"}
Let the bltching-n-moaning continue
You are that delusional that you don't even know when your ass is kicked, the Manny fanboys are the dumbest posters in the forum all the biggest talking fanboys which you are one have never boxed a single round, you're nothing but a cheerleader kid, the biggest education you could get is to actually have a real go at boxing get up to a least 6 rounders, then come and tell me the BS you spin now.
Do you really want me show you Manny clinching like a leech against a can saved by the ref, a major fault with you idiots is you don't apply the same rules to Manny as you do to everybody else, cheerleader is all you are.
Carry on Cheerleading!
That is a whole hell of a lot of hugging. Haha. Great post!
Stay blind Road closed.
{"data-align":"none","data-size":"full","src":"https:\/\/encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com\/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRATRLnr1-MkIPw06hZS_BXVqOhuqoaeLZq3GuqIUz76E6SK7CKLyzBQZsd5%20%20A"}
lol I've fuvked you up a thousand times in my epic thread regarding that matter (Pac Floyd). I refer you to visit it again. Your name is reloaded back then.
I've learned my lesson to never argue with stupid. You're like Bodybagz. You've deteriorated even more as Roadblock.. Find someone to debate with. I've thoroughly destroyed your whinny little ass so many times. Learn the queens berry rules of boxing. Intentional clinching is foul in boxing. He bought Bayless to allow him to queer clinch the whole damn night.
“It's hard to win an argument with a smart person, but it's damn near impossible to win an argument with a stupid person.” – Bill Murray
Carry on.
You are that delusional that you don't even know when your ass is kicked, the Manny fanboys are the dumbest posters in the forum all the biggest talking fanboys which you are one have never boxed a single round, you're nothing but a cheerleader kid, the biggest education you could get is to actually have a real go at boxing get up to a least 6 rounders, then come and tell me the BS you spin now.
Do you really want me show you Manny clinching like a leech against a can saved by the ref, a major fault with you idiots is you don't apply the same rules to Manny as you do to everybody else, cheerleader is all you are.
Carry on Cheerleading!
Better actually. I love Duran, but Pac has surpassed him in my book. Duran captured the MW title at age 37 or 38 from Iran Barkely. Pac won the WW title from an undefeated Thurman ten years his junior at age 40. All of Pac's trilogies have placed him well above any fighter of the last twenty years.
Ok I will use your words.
Forgot to add. Duran won the first fight with SRL because Sugar played his game and made it a slug fest. The second fight wasn't. Floyd boxed and Manny couldn't catch him. Meaning, Manny had poorer footwork for boxers who fights at a distance and uses the whole ring. Pac has great footwork. That's a huge factor on why Duran can't be top 3 for me. He lacks those quick dynamic feet. Manny has that in spades.
lol I've fuvked you up a thousand times in my epic thread regarding that matter (Pac Floyd). I refer you to visit it again. Your name is reloaded back then.
I've learned my lesson to never argue with stupid. You're like Bodybagz. You've deteriorated even more as Roadblock.. Find someone to debate with. I've thoroughly destroyed your whinny little ass so many times. Learn the queens berry rules of boxing. Intentional clinching is foul in boxing. He bought Bayless to allow him to queer clinch the whole damn night.
“It's hard to win an argument with a smart person, but it's damn near impossible to win an argument with a stupid person.” – Bill Murray
Carry on.
https://youtu.be/dz3a3XxsSDY
{"data-align":"none","data-size":"full","src":"http:\/\/wanna-joke.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/mayweather-hugs-fight-fail.jpg"}
{"data-align":"none","data-size":"full","src":"https:\/\/encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com\/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRATRLnr1-MkIPw06hZS_BXVqOhuqoaeLZq3GuqIUz76E6SK7CKLyzBQZsd5%20%20A"}
Here's an education video about the Queensberry Rules of boxing.
What not to do in boxing:
Number 2 rule : NO wrestling or HUGGING allowed @ 0:39
https://youtu.be/gu--l1hBMCg
lol that was different. Floyd was allowed to foul clinch the whole night. HUGE difference. Try again.
Ok I will use your words.
Forgot to add. Duran won the first fight with SRL because Sugar played his game and made it a slug fest. The second fight wasn't. Floyd boxed and Manny couldn't catch him. Meaning, Manny had poorer footwork for boxers who fights at a distance and uses the whole ring. Pac has great footwork. That's a huge factor on why Duran can't be top 3 for me. He lacks those quick dynamic feet. Manny has that in spades.
Broke that into paragraphs for ya, hard to read bro.
The problem here is the way you're beating up the record isn't legitimate (especially the Floyd portion). That's why I say you can't legitimately do it to everyone, you're just reaching mostly, not a lot of hard facts and you got a lot of lines crossed.
it wasn't that MAB and Morales were old, it was because they had wars with each other and Manny got them right after. Historically, fighters that do trilogies plus leave part of their best in those fights and are never the same. It's boxing history. You don't know that so you're not being legitimate.
Thurman is a great fighter. JMM was a great fighter and one of the only guys not on a losing streak which is why Manny went life & death with him so much. I have JMM winning all but the first fight which was a draw. ON PAPER, Manny got the wins, get it?
Floyd, come on man, Coralles was a great fighter and most people had Corrales stopping Floyd. Mosley was fine knocking out Margarito the fight before Floyd and Floyd was chasing Shane and Oscar for years, not his fault they couldn't get it done and there is only a 3 year gap between Shane turning pro and Floyd turning pro. Hardly a massive advantage.
Oscar clearly lost 116-112, not even close to winning, if you think there is an arguement there YDKSAB, straight up.
Why would you pick JMM over Canelo? Doesn't make sense, but you clearly DKSAB so I get it.
You can't really discredit Floyds resume without sounding like a complete idiot. Plenty of fighters you can't do that too, you're just new or unteachable.
But back to the point of the spear, Duran doesn't have great wins against guys that are even past it like Manny does.
BTW, Trampler is the matchmaker for Top Rank. All Manny's best wins were against guys that had big recent losses or went through massive wars like MAB and Morales so those are **'d, got it?
Right so back to the points, Duran's wins are against mostly shethouses. He doesn't have great names for wins on his record. If they were past it or not doesn't matter, the names aren't there.
Like I said originally, Manny ON PAPER has beaten better opossition that Duran and picking a top 5 Duran win wise is very difficult, because they're not there.
Mannys record ON PAPER shets on Duran's. Argue till you're blue in the face, you'll never be right and the longer you fight it, the dumber you look.
Margarito
Horn
Marquez
Morales
Spence
Manny gets the respect he gets because win or lose this guy is forever fighting guys who stylistically is just a bad matchup.
Floyd's resume is discredited so much in part because it reads like a who's who of slow, flat footed, short armed, fighters. Floyd fought like a guy scared to lose his zero.
Yeah Floyd was calling out Oscar but who was Oscar fighting Prime Vargas, Shane, Hopkins, etc. nobody really cared about Pretty Boy, when Floyd stepped up his market value he got the fight, but then what happened; Floyd was cherrypick City when he held all the cards.
Duran even with losses, ko'd etc is universally recognized as top 10 atg. Manny is cut from that cloth.
I will say though, that if Pac beats Spence, that will be extraordinary and I would compare it with Duran-Leonard I. Time will tell...
You know that's not gunna happen. Spence will save you from the trouble of those analogies. Spence knocks him out and has an easier time than Leonard did with Duran 1.
You just described Manny vs Floyd, Mannys footwork could never catch Floyds glad you can see it.
lol that was different. Floyd was allowed to foul clinch the whole night. HUGE difference. Try again.
Forgot to add. Duran won the first fight with SRL because Sugar played his game and made it a slug fest. The second fight wasn't. SRL boxed and Duran couldn't catch him. Meaning, Duran had poor footwork for boxers who fights at a distance and uses the whole ring. Pac has great footwork. That's a huge factor on why Duran can't be top 3 for me. He lacks those quick dynamic feet. Manny has that in spades.
You just described Manny vs Floyd, Mannys footwork could never catch Floyds glad you can see it.
He showed fast footwork against SRL in the first fight. And also against movers like Bizarro and Fernandez. His footwork is actually underrated these days. He couldn’t catch SRL because of things we don’t know, but it’s known that he over indulged himself prior to the rematch to the point that he was not in his best shape.
And I’m sorry but I just can’t envision Pac being able to handle someone like Hagler, even if they were the same size. That’s just me.
Pac is definitely a rare breed, but so is Duran. I just think Duran edges Pac skill wise and achievement wise. We’ll agree to disagree.
Forgot to add. Duran won the first fight with SRL because Sugar played his game and made it a slug fest. The second fight wasn't. SRL boxed and Duran couldn't catch him. Meaning, Duran had poor footwork for boxers who fights at a distance and uses the whole ring. Pac has great footwork. That's a huge factor on why Duran can't be top 3 for me. He lacks those quick dynamic feet. Manny has that in spades.
The question is could these guys beat Duran.
JMM by KO
Tim Bradley by pts
Jeff Horn by pts
TorreCampo by KO.
Duran would make a meal of Manny from 130 up.
This is what I hate about the boxing fanbase. I mean sure many sports have toxic fanbases but I don't think any of them can beat the fans of boxing. It's a f***king cesspool, man. With the worst of the worst here. We got so many pathetic lowlife posters here who virtually exist to trash certain fighters and attack certain fanbases. It's amazing. I've never really seen anything like it. Not on this level anyway. The disrespect here for boxers all over the spectrum is just off the charts. Everybody is overrated, everybody's a bum, everybody's on steroids. Zero respect at all for these fighters who really do put it on the line in an extremely dangerous and unforgiving sport.
And how pathetic and sad does one have to be to make website accounts just to spend countless hours discrediting boxers?? Lmao it's weird as f***k. I mean sure there are fighters I'm not a fan of, and guys I root against -- but you will never catch me here putting out post after post and thread after thread talking shyt about these guys. Why? Because I got better things and more productive things to do than spend time and energy attacking boxers and fans of those boxers from behind my damn keyboard. Like who the f***k does that?? Well apparently a f***king lot because this forum is overflowing with them. F***king weirdos man I swear. Get a f***king life you f***king nerds :lol1:
Agree with everything you said wholeheartedly. Never has there been any sport where they have the most toxic fanbase. There’s a reason why I’ve avoided this message board for awhile, and it’s because of lowlives like this BodyBagz kid that infest it. The amount of sh@t spewed by that loser is incredible but also sad. I remember he would constantly bump up his own thread dedicated
to hating on Pac hoping that he’s getting his own message across, but he’s really the only person who is commenting on it. What’s more disturbing is the fact that he really truly believes everything he is saying is the truth, like it’s the fcking holy grail. I have never seen a person this devoted in hating an athlete of high status.
Pathetic but also amusing :rofl:
He’s a fake fight fan that probably has no idea of any other fighter outside of Mayweather or Pacquiao.
Unlike you I actually appreciate the sport in its entirety, respect all fighters, and I don’t go out of my way to trash other athletes on a daily basis.
This is what I hate about the boxing fanbase. I mean sure many sports have toxic fanbases but I don't think any of them can beat the fans of boxing. It's a f***king cesspool, man. With the worst of the worst here. We got so many pathetic lowlife posters here who virtually exist to trash certain fighters and attack certain fanbases. It's amazing. I've never really seen anything like it. Not on this level anyway. The disrespect here for boxers all over the spectrum is just off the charts. Everybody is overrated, everybody's a bum, everybody's on steroids. Zero respect at all for these fighters who really do put it on the line in an extremely dangerous and unforgiving sport.
And how pathetic and sad does one have to be to make website accounts just to spend countless hours discrediting boxers?? Lmao it's weird as f***k. I mean sure there are fighters I'm not a fan of, and guys I root against -- but you will never catch me here putting out post after post and thread after thread talking shyt about these guys. Why? Because I got better things and more productive things to do than spend time and energy attacking boxers and fans of those boxers from behind my damn keyboard. Like who the f***k does that?? Well apparently a f***king lot because this forum is overflowing with them. F***king weirdos man I swear. Get a f***king life you f***king nerds :lol1:
1-Sugar Ray Leonard
2- Ken Buchanan
3- Davey Moore
4- Iran Barkley
5- Esteban DeJesus
6- Pipino Cuevas
7- Carlos Palomino
8- Saoul Mamby
9- Hiroshi Kobayashi
10- Ernesto Marcel
For one thing, it's must easier to list the names for a modern fighter. It's fresh on the memory. Duran started his career in the 60s. So much has been forgotten since then, including especially, inside fighting and referees who say "Punch and Get Out." And "names" doesn't always mean great or special either. It means they probably sold some tickets and not much else.
cmon man, you know how younger people are. Nothing matters past the point of when they started watching something. There are literally millions of people that think the NBA started in 1991 with Jordan and only Jordan, Kobe, or Lebron ever accomplished anything in the league's 74 year history.