Whenever the topic of his weak resume comes up you have people who always make excuses and say bu but but he would've beat those guys anyway!!! The most special of geetards try to compare his resume to the great Canelo, saying sht like "he would beat guys like trout, Lara and Cotto as well"
Ok? The G never fought them though so he can't get any credit for it on his weak ass resume. And of course a career 160 pounder In G would be favored over these smaller men.
Get a grip. In a geetards mind he also has imaginary wins over Martinez , Sturm, froch, etc :lol1:
he thinks that Golovkin has faced more quality opposition than almost any other fighter in history.....
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=824905
I rate Golovkin very highly
in a thread titled.....
" Why does GGG always get credit for imaginary wins??? "
you were STUPID enough to say that G has " 5-6 'great' wins ".....
but, you were then completely unable to even name 1 of those..... "great" wins LMAO
how fkn ironic is that ? LMAO
what is more ironic.....
you, providing a PERFECT demonstration why Golovkin's idiot fanbase give him credit for imaginary wins.....
or, you..... misquoting Steve Weisfeld to favor Golovkin, but being completely unaware that he judged the fight? loooool :lol1:
oh lordie LMAO
please..... make my day by explaining why you think that Murray, Lemieux, Vanes, and Monroe..... were better wins for Hypekin..... then Lara, Cotto, Mosley, and Trout, are..... for Canelo
then, you can make my year by explaining why you think that Bika, Barrera, and Miranda..... are as good as Andre Ward lol
you dribbling spastic casual-fan idiot :lol1:
just need somewhere to record your stupidity, this thread is appropriate
--------------------------------------------------------
Boxing1013..... PERSONAL WALL OF STUPIDITY
--------------------------------------------------------
thinks that Golovkin has a better resume than Canelo.....
I just made a thread about specifically why people rate Canelo's resume as better than GGG's...and I laid out my case as to why I rate GGG's better.....
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=820918
----------------------------
thinks that one of the " killers " on Golovkin's resume could have beaten Canelo.... but he will not say which one LMAO
I don't think Canelo would have gotten all of his guys out by KO and maybe would not have 'won' all of them.....
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=820918&page=10
----------------------------
thinks that Murray Lemieux Monroe and Vanes, are better wins for Golovkin..... than Lara Cotto Trout and Mosley, are for Canelo.....
Canelo's top wins would be Lara..Jacobs and Cotto imo...GGG's would be Jacobs, Murray and Lemieux...I don't see a ton of separation there..... winning 7-5 vs a great Lara...and going 12 with a shot fat Cotto...is not imo better than 8 Round destruction of Lemieux...and 11 round destruction of Murray..... Vanes was inactive and moving up in weight...but he wasn't shot like SSM more or less was..... I don't think going 12 with Mosley when Canelo did, or 12 with Trout, are better wins than GGG running through Monroe and Geale.....
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=820918&page=16
----------------------------
thinks that Andre Ward is no better than Bika Barrera and Miranda
I just never really saw the skills from him..... if he was born in a different country I don't think he would have been looked at much differently than Bika Barrera or Miranda etc.....
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?p=19903762#post19903762
----------------------------
thinks that Golovkin has 5-6 'great' wins..... but cannot even name 1 of those 'great' wins
Yeah he has about 10+ good wins imo...and 5-6 'great' wins if you want to term it that...great fighter, great career...an ATG at MW...that's pretty clear I think..... If a great win is a dominant win over another prime great fighter...I would say GGG has quite a few tbh.....
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=821123&page=20
----------------------------
creates a thread misquoting Steve Weisfeld.....
Boxing1013 attempted to remove defence, ring generalship, and effective aggression, as official scoring criteria..... to justify why he thinks Golovkin beat Canelo in their rematch..... but, had NO IDEA that Steve Weisfeld was AN OFFICIAL JUDGE at the Canelo/Golovkin rematch..... and Weisfeld scored that fight for Canelo looool
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=818903
-------------------------------
oh, you were being sarcastic ?
good to know
now I do not need to respond to the rest of that dribbley excuse-filled post
Because you and your just as stupid ilk has no response.
No idiot. I know that sarcasm and logic eludes you, but since you like to judge a fight on facial damage, Canelo's fight against Jacobs must have been a draw, right? Whereas GGG clearly beat Jacobs, the Canelo Jacobs fight must have been a draw.
oh, you were being sarcastic ?
good to know
now I do not need to respond to the rest of that dribbley excuse-filled post
what..... did..... you..... just..... say..... ?
did you say that facial damage is the #1 scoring criteria..... ?
do I need to post a pic of Golovkin after the Canelo rematch..... ?
careful :wave:
No idiot. I know that sarcasm and logic eludes you, but since you like to judge a fight on facial damage, Canelo's fight against Jacobs must have been a draw, right? Whereas GGG clearly beat Jacobs, the Canelo Jacobs fight must have been a draw.
Golovkin's legacy, in 20 years.....
boxing fan 1: hey, remember that Borat guy, the middleweight
boxing fan 2: who ?
boxing fan 1: you know, that guy..... Golovkin
boxing fan 2: nope
boxing fan 1: you know, the foreign guy everyone made fun of
boxing fan 2: nope, who'd he beat ?
boxing fan 1: ummm, not sure..... nobody really
boxing fan 2: nope, don't remember him
boxing fan 1: hey, remember that guy Broner...... he was a good fighter, funny too
boxing fan 2: yea, I remember him..... funny dude, good fighter
:lol1::lol1:
Yeah he has about 10+ good wins imo...and 5-6 'great' wins if you want to term it that...great fighter, great career...an ATG at MW...that's pretty clear I think.
in a thread titled.....
" Why does GGG always get credit for imaginary wins??? "
you were STUPID enough to post that G has " 5-6 'great' wins ".....
but you were then completely unable to even name 1 of these..... "great" wins LMAO
how fkn ironic is that ? :lol1:
what is more ironic.....
you, providing a PERFECT demonstration why Golovkin's idiot fanbase give him credit for imaginary wins.....
or, you..... misquoting Steve Weisfeld to favor Golovkin, but being completely unaware that he judged the fight? loooool :lol1:
oh lordie LMAO
please..... make my day by explaining why you think that Murray, Lemieux, and Monroe..... were better wins for Hypekin..... then Lara, Cotto, and Trout were..... for Canelo
then, you can make my year by explaining why you think that Bika, Barrera, and Miranda..... are as good as Andre Ward lol
you dribbling spastic casual-fan idiot :lol1:
Guess who has
1) A permanent stain on his record for drug use
2) Multiple broken weight clauses
3) Multiple questionable decisions
4) The most díckloving fanbase in all of boxing, who can't tell a fight
5) No balls
6) A draw against Jacobs, because neither had any damage to the face.
7) A draw against Jorge Juarez
8) A gift decision against a 5-17
9) Zero clear wins against anyone below the age of 35, in his own weight class and active fighters. ZERO. The exact same number of times you have had sex with humans.
what..... did..... you..... just..... say..... ?
did you say that facial damage is the #1 scoring criteria..... ?
do I need to post a pic of Golovkin after the Canelo rematch..... ?
careful :wave:
spot quiz:
guess who has.....
1) no titles
2) no chance of breaking Hopkins record
3) no signature win on his resume'
4) no 365m deal with DAZN
5) no pride
6) egg on his face
7) lumps on his face
8) the shlttiest fanbase in all of boxing
Guess who has
1) A permanent stain on his record for drug use
2) Multiple broken weight clauses
3) Multiple questionable decisions
4) The most díckloving fanbase in all of boxing, who can't tell a fight
5) No balls
6) A draw against Jacobs, because neither had any damage to the face.
7) A draw against Jorge Juarez
8) A gift decision against a 5-17
9) Zero clear wins against anyone below the age of 35, in his own weight class and active fighters. ZERO. The exact same number of times you have had sex with humans.
Yep as soon as you name those great Canelo wins you were talking about I will name the great GGG wins imo
you are the clown who started talking about " great " wins
you shlt-mouth casual-fan fukwit :lol1:
then you backed out the door, thinking that nobody would notice LMAO
FACT: everyone knows that you are just a fanboy idiot who makes claims that he cannot back up
Q. what sort of a fkn idiot would say that Murray Lemieux and Monroe, are better than Lara Cotto and Trout?
Q. and what sort of fkn idiot would say that Barrera, Bika, and Miranda..... are as good as Andre Ward?
A. the same sort of fukwit who would create a thread quoting Weisfeld..... not realizing that Weisfeld scored that fight for Golovkin :lol1:
b,b,b,b,but....
embarrassing LMAO
spot quiz:
guess who has.....
1) no titles
2) no chance of breaking Hopkins record
3) no signature win on his resume'
4) no 365m deal with DAZN
5) no pride
6) egg on his face
7) lumps on his face
8) the shlttiest fanbase in all of boxing
G-String and the Golovtards.
you make up quotes, and insert them into your sig ?
really ? :lol1:
you just got KO'd son LMAO
answer the question, you spastic little fukwit
name those 6 " great " wins !!
FACT: now everyone knows that you are just a shlt-talking idiot :):)
Yep as soon as you name those great Canelo wins you were talking about I will name the great GGG wins imo
spot quiz:
guess who has.....
1) no titles
2) no chance of breaking Hopkins record
3) no signature win on his resume'
4) no 365m deal with DAZN
5) no pride
6) egg on his face
7) lumps on his face
8) the shlttiest fanbase in all of boxing
That's so harsh, man. Why so hateful? C'mon bro.
spot quiz:
guess who has.....
1) no titles
2) no chance of breaking Hopkins record
3) no signature win on his resume'
4) no 365m deal with DAZN
5) no pride
6) egg on his face
7) lumps on his face
8) the shlttiest fanbase in all of boxing
No dude I asked you for your great Canelo wins...stop dodging it.
Also every time I talk to you now I am reminded of that time you said you wanted to watch Canelo shower naked lol
That's wild man...just deluded really lol...Wilder is better than people give him credit for though...and he is definitely improving and has some pretty solid clear wins on his resume...Ortiz was a great win imo.
Brezeale Washington Stiverne twice, and probably a couple others were pretty good wins too...he needs about 10 more good to really good wins to match GGG at this point though.
I also thought it was a draw vs Fury so I don't really slight him for that result...though GGG did get 2 legit Ws vs Canelo when he stepped up in those fights.
Wilder is getting better though...interested to see how he does in the Ortiz and Fury rematches
you make up quotes, and insert them into your sig ?
really ? :lol1:
you just got KO'd son LMAO
answer the question, you spastic little fukwit
name those 6 " great " wins !!
FACT: now everyone knows that you are just a shlt-talking idiot :):)
Canelo and GGG will each go his own way, to never ever fight again. Their fans may also wanna follow their lead. This topic is pukeworthy. It's overdone.
Focus, danger ahead, change direction!
name those 6 " great " wins !!..... you shlt-talking fukwit LMAO
No dude I asked you for your great Canelo wins...stop dodging it.
Also every time I talk to you now I am reminded of that time you said you wanted to watch Canelo shower naked lol
I hate both guys, and Canelo would beat everyone on GGG roster.
Wilder has a better resume than GGG.
That's wild man...just deluded really lol...Wilder is better than people give him credit for though...and he is definitely improving and has some pretty solid clear wins on his resume...Ortiz was a great win imo.
Brezeale Washington Stiverne twice, and probably a couple others were pretty good wins too...he needs about 10 more good to really good wins to match GGG at this point though.
I also thought it was a draw vs Fury so I don't really slight him for that result...though GGG did get 2 legit Ws vs Canelo when he stepped up in those fights.
Wilder is getting better though...interested to see how he does in the Ortiz and Fury rematches
I hate both guys, and Canelo would beat everyone on GGG roster.
Wilder has a better resume than GGG.
:lol1: TonyGe will be having a right spastication over that one LMAO