better resume: tyson (pre douglas) or AJ (pre ruiz)

Mike Tyson.

facts are facts And dumb OPINIONS are dumb OPINIONS

I was going to laugh until I remembered the Wlad fight. TBH that makes it a bit of an interesting question, though Tyson's is still better.

Dumb, even for an idiot like you........ facts are facts

Aj has now surpassed Tyson, fact Tyson never avenge his losses Dumb, even for an idiot like you........

I’m sure mike Tyson has made 35-40 fights by the time he had this fight. Joshua made 22? I think. So on the basis of how quickly Joshua has progressed I think AJ is ahead of Mike Tyson. The real fair comparison I went Joshua gets to 35 ish fights himself.

Aj has now surpassed Tyson, fact Tyson never avenge his losses

Have you seen Holmes' record post the Tyson fight? Any way you cut it, Tyson's destruction of Holmes was a good win - and probably better than Joshua's win over Wlad considering the following Holmes is higher regarded than Wlad NOBODY had ever man-handled Holmes in the fashion Tyson did Holmes had a good run post Tyson Wlad had been KO'ed before Joshua Wlad was a competitive fight - Tyson Holmes was NOT have u seen the holmes that fought tyson? he was so out of it, not even 30% of what he used to be. just because holmes had a good run after doesn't change the fact that holmes was ill prepared and complete **** against tyson.

wlad had been knocked out in his prime a couple times by decent fighters. he was old and gave joshua hell. the tyson that fought holmes would have creamed Wlad. neither's resume was great.

Any light Heavyweight you want to name wouldn't have beaten Wlad in his first fight at HW. That's your opinion. It's a fact that Spinks was better than Sanders, Brewster, and Puritty.

Any light Heavyweight you want to name wouldn't have beaten Wlad in his first fight at HW. That wasn't Spinks first fight at heavyweight. So you're putting out false information.

Pre douglas tyson for sure

I don't recall Wlad losing to light heavyweights. I'm not saying Wlad was greater. But the version Joshua fought is better than the Holmes that fought Tyson. A HOF light heavyweight far more skilled than Ross Puritty. You have no evidence that the version of Wlad was better.

Would you take that Holmes to beat the Wlad that Joshua fought? :rofl: I don't recall Holmes losing to fighters like Ross Puritty.

how is joshua's win over wlad any better then tysons over holmes or spinks? keep it real larry, holmes was a walking dead man against tyson. there is a difference between not fighting for almost 2 years and being retired. larry was done with the sport, wlad was in hibernation, he is a gym rat so always stays in shape.

the wlad that fought aj beats the sh$t out of homes and spinks. larry was retired for 2 years ffs. titles don't mean *****. broner is a 3 or 4 division world champ isn't he? who cares. Broner has never won a lineal championship, nor has he been undisputed. That's why there is a distinction made in the first place. The lineal title is a true world championship, not a paper title handed out on political terms by a sanctioning body just trying to make a buck.

the wlad that fought aj beats the sh$t out of homes and spinks. larry was retired for 2 years ffs. titles don't mean *****. broner is a 3 or 4 division world champ isn't he? who cares. wlad also was out for almost 2 years

how is joshua's win over wlad any better then tysons over holmes or spinks?

C'mon bruh. You honestly felt the need to make this thread after deliberately typing the names Michael Spinks and Larry Holmes. **** outta here bro. I do agree that Joshua's resume is pretty good but you can't compete with Holmes and Spinks. Even if they were both past their best. the wlad that fought aj beats the sh$t out of homes and spinks. larry was retired for 2 years ffs. Tyson was undisputed and lineal champion. He won the WBC, WBA, IBF, Ring, and lineal titles (this was before the WBO or IBO). Joshua never won the lineal title, nor the WBC or the Ring. End of discussion. titles don't mean *****. broner is a 3 or 4 division world champ isn't he? who cares.

Tyson was undisputed and lineal champion. He won the WBC, WBA, IBF, Ring, and lineal titles (this was before the WBO or IBO). Joshua never won the lineal title, nor the WBC or the Ring. End of discussion.