I don't even know where to begin.
Too many dumb ass boxing fans.
1. Pacquiao has been greater than Mayweather.
He's been greater than Mayweather since the Cotto fight.
2. It's not a question of IF Pacquiao beats Thurman but HOW. Pac W by KO, TKO, UD..... who knows?
Pacquiao win is a lock. Boxrec already updated his record to reflect the W I think.
So Floyd started fighting at super feather, if he was to match what Pacquiao achieved then he would have to win a world title at heavyweight, that equates to 10 weight divisions, who thinks Floyd could do that, any takers
No takers still, wow where are all the Fluid IVayweather nut huggers, this is a fair and reasonable way to see who has achieved more in more weight classes, where is trannyNY, dumbsumption or lil robbie
This Thread clearly shows this forum is filled with more women than men. You guys are making comments/statements based off your emotions, and not common sense.
I can’t believe we are really having a discussion about Manny being better then Floyd. Next thing you guys will be saying is Tyson Fury is better than Mike Tyson. Like what sport are you watching ?!
You seem pretty emotional there, susan.
Cmon now, cut it out keyboard Queen. You've been on this site since 2008 and average 20 post per day. Dude Get a Life and Real Occupation instead of acting like a female on this public forum 24/7. Im the wrong one to play games with my friend.
1. Complains about ppl being women
2. Complains about ppl being emotional
3. Is the only one on the thread being an emo chick.
Lol
Then she starts internet tough talk.
I think you mean 'dumbest'
and pretty sure you mean 'hit the nail on the head'
Did you really just go out your way to correct something that we all understood?
Smh too much time on these guys hands I tell ya.
You seem pretty emotional there, susan.
Cmon now, cut it out keyboard Queen. You've been on this site since 2008 and average 20 post per day. Dude Get a Life and Real Occupation instead of acting like a female on this public forum 24/7. Im the wrong one to play games with my friend.
This Thread clearly shows this forum is filled with more women than men. You guys are making comments/statements based off your emotions, and not common sense.
I can’t believe we are really having a discussion about Manny being better then Floyd. Next thing you guys will be saying is Tyson Fury is better than Mike Tyson. Like what sport are you watching ?!
You seem pretty emotional there, susan.
This Thread clearly shows this forum is filled with more women than men. You guys are making comments/statements based off your emotions, and not common sense.
I can’t believe we are really having a discussion about Manny being better then Floyd. Next thing you guys will be saying is Tyson Fury is better than Mike Tyson. Like what sport are you watching ?!
It’s a hard argument, Floyd covered 5 divisions whereas Pacquiao has titles in 8 divisions and if my memory serves me correct, he also bypassed 2 divisions, that has to count for a lot, Floyd was tarnished with the IV scandal as well, 10 divisions is a hell of a lot from lightest fight to heaviest fight, that would equate to Floyd fighting until he reached cruiser weight or heavyweight, I couldn’t see Floyd being successful up there, in comparison, Pacquiao was
So Floyd started fighting at super feather, if he was to match what Pacquiao achieved then he would have to win a world title at heavyweight, that equates to 10 weight divisions, who thinks Floyd could do that, any takers
That's not true. There were plenty who thought he lost that fight. It wasn't a robbery for me. When I watched it live I didn't score it, but I said, "Wow. He might have lost this one." And he did. I was only surprised because Pac wasn't expected to lose, but I wasn't surprised with the decision. It certainly didn't seem like a robbery to me, and I know they had other judges review it as well.
Nah, everyone's knows it was a hometown decision until proven otherwise. Floyd was right to be American sven ottke. Good decision floyd.
. That's a lame excuse. The dude even lifted a belt off of him, but Pac has no time to avenge it. He seemed to have found time to fight Broner. Please tell me what legacy fight that was all about :lol1:
Pac s win over broner is better than most of floyd s resume. Madiana was only slightly better than broner when they fought, yet Floyd made Madiana look elite ATG. Pac at 40 fought better version of broner than Madana did.
If Floyd ducked Thurman, then give me a list of who Pacquiao ducked. Starting with Crawford and Spence. Who else?
Pac don't duck he's fighting no1 ww. When Pac beats thurman thurman will beat spence and crawford and Pac will live off the win like Floyd does with his win over gre en, cw, inexperienced at highest level nelo and bad shoulder pac?
Did he duck that Jeff Horn rematch? What do you think? ;)
No, Floyd didn't duck Thurman. No one thought that fight was next. ?
Your not exactly comparing like for like comparisons are you?
Everyone thinks Pac beat horn so if course horn would like rematch. Pac s got less fights to fight now, he can't waste time avenging robberies all the time.
He's got legacy fights like against the guy Floyd ducked in thurman at 36 years old. Yet Pacs 40. Shows how cautious Floyd was throughout career. No wonder Pac s considered greater. Floyd was far too old at 36.
It was no surprise Floyd dodging thurman though it's a pattern he followed right to the end of career
You know this based on what? If Pac wins, I will give him full credit.
I have no excuse. Let's make a bet. The first person who has an excuse for the outcome of the fight owes all points and sig control. What do you think?
deal. put that in your sig......
All we know is that when may fought Pac it was simply a formality, Floyd had aged better and taken less punishment. But it does not determine how they would of fared in their prime and unfortunately we will never know.. so mayweather doesn't get too much overwhelming props for that win, yet it is a good win nonetheless and head to head on paper it makes Floyd the better fighter. But not only with the old cliche styles make fights, but with the timing of when they fought considered along with what they achieved in their respective careers. It's entirely subjective as to who is the better fighter, it is each to their own, what you prefer just like judging. Along with all your personal feelings about certain fights and opponents at the time, nostalgia etc. No one has an objective view on this. And I don't think anyone cares anymore. Let the future generations make that judgement and let us just have our own opinions and argue them passionately yet pleasantly. And that's all that can be done. Just like with all the back and forth arguing about wilder and AJ now, it's pointless it's got to the point where it is just white noise. Just let it be. May has retired, Pac is still active. They fought when it was too late. They both had epic careers. For me the difference is that for a lot of Floyd's career he fought very defensively and did enough to win rounds and also was very selective with the timing of when he fought certain fighters. That's what I didn't enjoy so much. Whereas Pac managed to have similar success while being a heart on his sleeve blood and guys kind of guy fighting in an entertaining style. That's the difference for me, it is a spectator sport after all. This is pro boxing not amateur
This just proves what an absolute joke you are. You are trying to argue that I've made excuses for something that literally hasn't happened yet and in all likelihood won't happen.
What's going to be your excuse when Pacquiao loses? You can't say he was too old since you thought he would win, right?
Anything you want to say about the judges and ref before this fight happens. Go on record now so YOU have no excuses to hide behind ;)
I already said that i will give full credit to thurman if he can beat the current pac and for me he will be the undisputed no. 1 welterweight unlike you who i know will twist everthing just to downgrade pac win.
I don't need to say "what's your excuse when pac win" because i know u already have one ready.
Riiight. I'm sure we all believe you.
No one takes you seriously when it comes to Floyd, so just stop the bullshlt. If Floyd ducked Thurman, did Pac duck Crawford and Spence? Enlighten us, ol' wise one.
I swear on my best ever friend at schools life the general consensus when Floyd was fighting ber to is that he was ducking thurman. So don't belittle Pac for fighting thurman. That's bottom line. Stop trying change subject by talking about spence and crawford
Who is the #1 undispulted welter? Thurman?
Let's see what "controversial" excuse you come up with when he loses. Should be interesting. I'm guessing we'll have some more slow motion videos.
What's interesting is your excuses just to downgrade pacs win after july 20.
7y ago
Dumb boxing fans saying Pacquiao is greater than Mayweather if he beats Thurman. | BoxingScene Community