How Fox inflates their ratings

why did you think 3 people sharing one account was a good idea? I was hired to do a job and needed help. Was too busy to monitor the site 24/7.

I know for a loser like you that doesn't have any friends, it's hard to believe that somebody else has friends. Go for a walk. Go get laid. Help a stranger. Read a book. Something productive. i have friends but they dont share my boxingscene account. does your mom also post on your account? why did you think 3 people sharing one account was a good idea? you realize they are free right? dont you like to have your own opinions? your own ideas? do you have to call your "friends/bosses" when you want to post something and get their approval? how pathetic

ever get frustrated when the ibf guy changes the password and you cant log on for a week? I know for a loser like you that doesn't have any friends, it's hard to believe that somebody else has friends. Go for a walk. Go get laid. Help a stranger. Read a book. Something productive.

That's not how ratings work. I wonder why you don't know how they work. Maybe because you don't work in TV? you tell him how things work! wait are you the wbc, wba, or ibf guy today? ever get frustrated when the ibf guy changes the password and you cant log on for a week?

wrong look at espn b numbers again. Wrong look at overall viewership. ABC cbs beat fox. That's not how ratings work. I wonder why you don't know how they work. Maybe because you don't work in TV?

You're lying. ESPN did a .15. Fox did a .3. ESPN did half the rating in 18-49 as Fox did. You're lying. Fox, ABC and CBS all tied with a .3 in 18-49.wrong look at espn b numbers again. Wrong look at overall viewership. ABC cbs beat fox.

With 1/2 the viewer ESPN was only 16% lower ratings in the key 16-49 demographic. You're lying. ESPN did a .15. Fox did a .3. ESPN did half the rating in 18-49 as Fox did. Fox was dead last for ratings behind abc cbs and nbc. Those are facts. You're lying. Fox, ABC and CBS all tied with a .3 in 18-49.

You don't understand how ratings work. The main event wasn't included in the rating. Ratings go by hour. Fox did a .3 in 18-49 from 8-9. Fox did a .3 in 18-49 from 9-10. Fox tied ABC and CBS both hours. All three networks did a .3 in 18-49 in both hours. Anything after 10 wasn't included. NBC had the NHL and won the night. The other three networks tied. In your uneducated, inexperienced, amateur opinion, based on nothing but bias and sexual frustration. CBS, FOX and ABC all had the same average. Nascar costs them 420 million a year. PBC costs them 60 million a year. Nascar better do a higher rating you ****ing fool.whoa I seem to have struck a nerve with Al Haymon’s bottom boy. Not only is Haymon a proven tranny lover but u are his min lady boy. With 1/2 the viewer ESPN was only 16% lower ratings in the key 16-49 demographic. Fox was dead last for ratings behind abc cbs and nbc. Those are facts. Why must u defend pbc like its your lover? Your obsession is borderline criminal. I may have to report u as a supposedly non bias observer but you are displaying serial killer type tendencies. Al haymon’s got his schlong rammed so far down your throat that your ability to see the truth is significantly impaired. NASCAR has more shows than the 22 a year pbc has of course it costs more. this wasn’t even a big race it was on fs1 a chanel based on ratings by pbc cards on fs1 no one watches.

The main event saved this from being a total disaster. You don't understand how ratings work. The main event wasn't included in the rating. Ratings go by hour. Fox did a .3 in 18-49 from 8-9. Fox did a .3 in 18-49 from 9-10. Fox tied ABC and CBS both hours. All three networks did a .3 in 18-49 in both hours. Anything after 10 wasn't included. NBC had the NHL and won the night. The other three networks tied. It peaked very high but still had a mediocre average. In your uneducated, inexperienced, amateur opinion, based on nothing but bias and sexual frustration. CBS, FOX and ABC all had the same average. FOX would've been better off putting NASCAR in that timeslot since the race on FS1 actually had higher ratings than PBC. Nascar costs them 420 million a year. PBC costs them 60 million a year. Nascar better do a higher rating you ****ing fool.

The 8-9 hour did a .3 in the key demo. The 9-10 hour did a .3 in the key demo. The over run isn't factored into that. Had the main event aired on time, that hour would have done a better rating. The rating wasn't helped in any way by the telecast running long. You don't understand how ratings work. ESPN did a .15 in the key demo. Ratings are based on a percentage of households who get the channel, so Fox being in more homes is irrelevant. PBC did twice as well as Top Rank in the 18-49 demo. PBC's rating didn't include the over run, Top Rank's did. So it's actually the Top Rank rating that was assisted by people tuning in for Sportscenter. You have no idea how these things work. You're a troll on the internet. With no experience, knowledge, or insight. The main event saved this from being a total disaster. It peaked very high but still had a mediocre average. FOX would've been better off putting NASCAR in that timeslot since the race on FS1 actually had higher ratings than PBC. UFC also had a 1% higher rating among younger viewers and the Top Rank card on ESPN was only 16% lower than PBC in the 18-49 demo despite having half as many overall viewers. PBC's audience skews much older than what is typical of combat sports.

nope I already explained why your reasons are lies. Espn doesn’t need to do the same thing to inflate their ratings. The 8-9 hour did a .3 in the key demo. The 9-10 hour did a .3 in the key demo. The over run isn't factored into that. Had the main event aired on time, that hour would have done a better rating. The rating wasn't helped in any way by the telecast running long. You don't understand how ratings work. ESPN did a .15 in the key demo. Ratings are based on a percentage of households who get the channel, so Fox being in more homes is irrelevant. PBC did twice as well as Top Rank in the 18-49 demo. PBC's rating didn't include the over run, Top Rank's did. So it's actually the Top Rank rating that was assisted by people tuning in for Sportscenter. You have no idea how these things work. You're a troll on the internet. With no experience, knowledge, or insight.

PBC isn't who pays me. The company that pays me isn't currently involved in boxing. I do know that Matchroom pays people to post here. I do know that Top Rank pays people to post here. I don't know if PBC pays people to post here. They probably don't considering they largely ignore the internet and media. Running over doesn't inflate ratings. You have no idea what you're talking about. I already gave you the reasons they run over.nope I already explained why your reasons are lies. Espn doesn’t need to do the same thing to inflate their ratings. Your obsession with pbc means they pay you or you are one of Al’s trannies. There is no other reason for blind faith and unwavering support for the pbc. It’s really bizarre.

pbc paying someone to post here is both laughable and cringeworthy. PBC isn't who pays me. The company that pays me isn't currently involved in boxing. I do know that Matchroom pays people to post here. I do know that Top Rank pays people to post here. I don't know if PBC pays people to post here. They probably don't considering they largely ignore the internet and media. The big question we need answered is why does fox run over 60-90 minutes consistently to inflate ratings yet espn doesn’t need to resort to those tactics? Running over doesn't inflate ratings. You have no idea what you're talking about. I already gave you the reasons they run over.

How is it supposed to be an insult that I wore wrestling attire when I wrestled? Would you make fun of a bowler for using a bowling ball? This site is owned by CBS. Not PBC. Why are you lying about easily verifiable public information?pbc paying someone to post here is both laughable and cringeworthy. The big question we need answered is why does fox run over 60-90 minutes consistently to inflate ratings yet espn doesn’t need to resort to those tactics?

you’re the only wrestling leotard wearing moron on the site. How is it supposed to be an insult that I wore wrestling attire when I wrestled? Would you make fun of a bowler for using a bowling ball? The pbc owned website caught pbc in the act This site is owned by CBS. Not PBC. Why are you lying about easily verifiable public information?

You fking losers with your network wars. Bunch of godamn f@ggots on this forum anymore. Tiresome to come here and see that people don't even talk about the science and how certain fights might go down. Just just bicker about networks and promoters. Preach. This shit is making me so jaded, man. I know everyone looks at boxing through rose-tinted glasses to whatever era it was when they were in their teens-early twenties, but man.... if feels like the toxicity of the Pacquiao-Mayweather fanboy period has poisoned this era as well. Call me crazy, but this **** didn't matter 10 years ago.

So, not only do they put the main event on later at night, WHEN VIEWERSHIP IS DOWN, they then do the same thing on FS1, to try to cover their tracks, as part of a vast conspiracy to trick 10 o'clock news viewers, on a Saturday night, into watching boxing. You're really just a whole other level of moron.a risky you’re the only wrestling leotard wearing moron on the site. The pbc owned website caught pbc in the act and you who claim to not be paid by the pbc and have nothing to do with pbc have this weird obsession on showing the pbc in a positive light and actually gets triggered enough to lie to defend them is really odd. An ex former mud wrestler who claims to be a tv exec and alsonclaims to have seen Terence Ceawford’s Contract for his fight against khan. Your fairytales are too much. How long till boxingscene suspends u for the 4th time?

Sportcenter usually gets lower ratings than boxing so that theory doesn't make sense. Having a great lead in is good for ratings but they're not trying to trick people into watching boxing because it's already on their programming guide. Overrunning your alloted time is a dumb strategy if they want to boost ratings because you're putting an extra undercard fight that no one cares about and few people will watch which will drag down your average. You're also forcing your main event to compete against ESPN, DAZN, and Saturday Night Live and that was reflected when Garcia-Granados suffered because it was on at the same time as the Crawford-Khan PPV. PBC's strategy might be to run over their time to give their fighters more exposure but I'm not convinced it's to inflate their ratings. True...However, just like with Fox, if you have the 300-500K Hardcore Boxing Fans or whatever tuned in, then all of a sudden the Regular Casual Viewer tunes in when their Local News usually suppose to start or when Sportscenter is usually Suppose to start then regardless if it is by design or not, you're going to get a Ratings Bump ALL Live Sporting Events go over, not sure why some want to make this a big deal when it comes to Boxing. "Your Local News Coverage Will Begin After The Game" is not something New

DAZN cant even show us any numbers.

they are just inflating their ratings on Fox we get it. Then they do the same running over on fs1 so it doesn’t look any different. So, not only do they put the main event on later at night, WHEN VIEWERSHIP IS DOWN, they then do the same thing on FS1, to try to cover their tracks, as part of a vast conspiracy to trick 10 o'clock news viewers, on a Saturday night, into watching boxing. You're really just a whole other level of moron.