Is Mikey better than Thurman?

Fundamentally alot better but that wont matter at 147.. thurman is the better WW.

Thurman has better wins. Is this even a question? Before spence fight mikey had b quality wins.. Why did people even think he was special at all.

The only thing Garcia is better at is getting his ass kicked. That and fistpumps.

- -I'd pick Spence hands down in any two man decathlon competition, but yeah, Thurm prob whoops him at 100 Meters and can make more chicken squawking and flapping noises if that's your definition of athleticism. Not mine!!! Listen cornball hahahaha wtf is wrong w u man?

Listen cornball hahahaha wtf is wrong w u man?

As a boxer Yes. At Welterweight No. The obvious choice

Mikey is the smarter fighter Keith is the better athlete. That said I think Mikey poses a bigger mental challenge for Spence who I think is pretty overrated to begin with. If Brook had KO power and wasn't GGGs leftovers he would have beaten Spence who was clearly getting outboxed until Brook gassed out. Garcia is the more polished more disciplined version of what Spence saw against Brook. What wins? size or boxing skill? It does make for an interesting scenario.

Is Mikey a tougher fight for Spence than Keith Thurman? Tbh I think Mikey has better boxing skills and IQ than Keith I was very impressed when Mikey shut Broner out 12 rds to nothing.The scorecards were not 12 rds. to nothing. Broner won a few rounds on the cards although Mikey won by a lot just as Pacquiao beat Broner by a lot.

Is Mikey a tougher fight for Spence than Keith Thurman? Tbh I think Mikey has better boxing skills and IQ than Keith I was very impressed when Mikey shut Broner out 12 rds to nothing.I think Mikey is better than the Thurman who fought Lopez and would beat Thurman in a welterweight fight. I think Spence is much better than either Thurman or Mikey and knocks them both out within 8 rounds and probably less. MAN DOWN!

- -Thurm is butter, not better.

No he isn't. Funny how Thurman went from overrated to underrated again.

Thurman would be considered the more athletic fighter - -I'd pick Spence hands down in any two man decathlon competition, but yeah, Thurm prob whoops him at 100 Meters and can make more chicken squawking and flapping noises if that's your definition of athleticism. Not mine!!!

Is this a joke lol. Youd think spemce was stepping in the ring with ****ing king kong not some lightweight the way some of you are hyping it, at this rate spence will be the underdog come fight night :lol1: Stfu u lil g-string sniffer no one is overhyping anything. I already said Spence is too much for Mikey, but Mikey is still a great boxer who already fought at 140 and looked dominant. Learn to give credit where credit is due.

Thurman struggled with a guy Berto knocked out

Yes p4p Mikey is a better fighter. Idk if he's better at 147 though.

Thurman would be considered the more athletic fighter

He maybe more durable that's for sure. Mikey has better stamina and boxing skills.