no hating wanted just opinions
IMO he lost to:
Trout
Mayweather
Lara
Coto
GGG
GGG
He gets this IMO cos Nelo brings money to the sport, judges, venue, cities, promoters, etc
so its in the judges best interest to favour nelo in fights
and im sure GB give their helping hand ;)
ALL IMO OF COURSE
Amir Khan is this you...you exaggerating
On the weight..180 wtf...he weighed in at 155 and you gonna tell me he gained 25lbs over night
Oooooookkkk
LMAOOOOO I took that straight out Amir's mouth but yeah, Canelo way bigger then Cotto in that fight. He was eating everything Cotto threw at him and coming forward.
Trout - I remember having Trout winning by 1 point
Mayweather - I gave Canelo 2 rounds in this fight
GGG 1st fight - I think GGG should have probably got the decision in the first fight while in the second I was okay with Canelo getting the decision.
The first fight with GGG is the only one that I stand by as a clear loss. The second fight I also gave to GGG but it was a very close fight that gets no argument from me either way. I thought Canelo edged Lara, Trout, and put a boxing lesson on Cotto. He looked brilliant in that fight to me.
no hating wanted just opinions
IMO he lost to:
Trout
Mayweather
Lara
Coto
GGG
GGG
He gets this IMO cos Nelo brings money to the sport, judges, venue, cities, promoters, etc
so its in the judges best interest to favour nelo in fights
and im sure GB give their helping hand ;)
ALL IMO OF COURSE
He did lose to Floyd lol
Canelo should have at least 4 Ls on his record ; there should be no debate he lost to
Mayweather
Lara
Golovkin (2)
I think if Canelo wasn’t judged differently from every other fighter he would have received at least 1 draw against either Trout / Cotto
It’s not only that he won fights he shouldnt have its that in every one of those fights ( except Golovkin 2) He receives at least 1 judges scorecard that is so far off the mark you wonder if their even watching the fight.
114-114 Mayweather
118-110 Golovkin
117-111 Lara
119-109 Cotto
118-110 Trout
You can’t think something isn’t up or defend it. And sure as sh.it a second judge will always give him the benefit and anytime it was ruled 7-5 in favour of Canelo or 6-6 in the first Golovkin fight . Every Judge in that gave Canelo the deciding scorecard for his undeserved win/draw
Everytime gave Canelo the 12th. How can you look at that as anything other then suspicious or corrupt
Even in the Golovkin rematch which couldn’t have repeated the scorecard f.uckery in the first fight
it was scored by 2 judges 115-113 . One of them gave Canelo 6 of the first 8 rounds and the other 6 of the first 9 . So Canelos guaranteed at least a draw by the time 2/3 of the fight is done. Not hard to give him 1 of the last 3-4 rounds for the win , by mere coincidence they both gave Canelo the 12th for the W. Not as blatant as the first but very suspicious how it was scored . More of a down low type f.uckery
Brudda that is THE Best analysis I ever read on the subject and makes the scam even more evident than I thought. Especially when he pretty much gets the first 6 rounds. It's a predetermined system that ensures a draw as the worst case scenario.
He's a great fighter what harm is there to lose a close one when he will get the rematch and possibly perform better. That's real competition.
It's not so much the fights I thought Ginger lost, it's about what seems like a prefilled scorecard in favor of him.....from the Mayweather fight to Cotto to GGG (1st fight). There are more, but that's just off top
Floyd
I thought he beat everyone else, and had GGG 1 a draw. Canelo won the first 3 and last 3 rds, ggg everything inbetween. 2nd fight was clearly a canelo win.
Lara fight was close but I thought canelo had it 115-113
Danny jacobs is a huge test, and might be canelos toughest matchup style wise in his career. This is a 50/50 fight
Canelo should have at least 4 Ls on his record ; there should be no debate he lost to
Mayweather
Lara
Golovkin (2)
I think if Canelo wasn’t judged differently from every other fighter he would have received at least 1 draw against either Trout / Cotto
It’s not only that he won fights he shouldnt have its that in every one of those fights ( except Golovkin 2) He receives at least 1 judges scorecard that is so far off the mark you wonder if their even watching the fight.
114-114 Mayweather
118-110 Golovkin
117-111 Lara
119-109 Cotto
118-110 Trout
You can’t think something isn’t up or defend it. And sure as sh.it a second judge will always give him the benefit and anytime it was ruled 7-5 in favour of Canelo or 6-6 in the first Golovkin fight . Every Judge in that gave Canelo the deciding scorecard for his undeserved win/draw
Everytime gave Canelo the 12th. How can you look at that as anything other then suspicious or corrupt
Even in the Golovkin rematch which couldn’t have repeated the scorecard f.uckery in the first fight
it was scored by 2 judges 115-113 . One of them gave Canelo 6 of the first 8 rounds and the other 6 of the first 9 . So Canelos guaranteed at least a draw by the time 2/3 of the fight is done. Not hard to give him 1 of the last 3-4 rounds for the win , by mere coincidence they both gave Canelo the 12th for the W. Not as blatant as the first but very suspicious how it was scored . More of a down low type f.uckery
They are! Marquez and Nacho always hating on Canelo! They feel Canelo got everything handed to him and he didn't earn it the way Marquez did... I'll agree that Canelo was given a title opportunity he probably didn't deserve but how they gonna blame Canelo for that???
If they wanna blame someone then blame the WBC! And you know they salty that at such a young age Canelo was already a huge star in Mexico and in the United States and earning millions in the process while Marquez had it rough and didn't start making millions till his late 30's... I like and respect Marquez but how you gonna hate on another man for that??
Marquez and Nacho always hating on Canelo and that's fucced up cause they are two of my favorite fighters....
To me they think they are equal to Canelo. I don't think Canelo is charismatic, but apparently millions do since he is truly a PPV star. He became a star on his own. Marquez was great counter puncher but has no X factor of any kind. Had it not been for his Pacquiao fights he would be as well known as a Castillo. Not a PPV attraction ever and he can't figure out why since he worked so hard and acheived greatness in the ring. Canelo's record speaks for itself, he didn't need a B side for any of his fights. Even Mayweather made money on Canelo's coattails otherwise it would be 300K PPV sales like he had against Berto. Marquez career is not memorable at all once you take Manny's name off. That's why he's jealous. When I say this I am not knocking the man or his abiliity. He was a great.
I thought Canelo lost to Mayweather by about 7 or 8 points. I thought he lost the first fight to GGG by 4 points and I thought he lost the 2nd fight to GGG by two points. I thought Canelo beat Lara by 2 points and he beat Trout by 4 points and beat Cotto by 6 points. I scored all these fights carefully and tried to be fair to both fighters. I think Canelo has improved a lot with every fight and I expect him to KO Jacobs even thought Jacobs is better than Mayweather, Lara, Trout and Cotto were when Canelo fought them. His steady improvement fight after fight has amazed me. Canelo always gets generous scoring in Vagas. That is just a fact. But it's not as bad as some say. if Jacobs can really win 8 of the 12 rounds I think he will get a win. If Jacobs only wins 7 rounds he will probably be lucky to get a draw. But maybe the judges will be more fair this fight. Anyway I think Canelo wins by KO or by a clear deserved ud.