I don't know why people keep saying this, because its not true. Canelo has been in some very close fights (vs Lara, Trout, GGG) but the decisions in those fights were not robberies. There have been a few bad scorecards, like 118-110 against GGG or 118-109 against Trout but the actual decision of a draw or 7-5 type decision to Canelo is fine. The fact is that nobody except Mayweather has convincingly beaten Canelo and until someone else does you all should stop ****ing whining and learn what an actual robbery is.
So you completely ignored the body shot that put Lara on his bike huh? LOL
THE bodyshot? I know but that was one round. Ask me how many times Canelo missed??? 9 out of 183 jabs landeds smhhh
OP goes on to say never been a robbery then mentions some of the worst score cards such as ggg first fight and the lara fight with canelo winning almost every rd. LMAO.
The Trout fight was dead even through 8, yet open scoring already had Trout incapable of winning a decision on the scorecards.
He had a draw scorecard against Mayweather in a fight where Alvarez didn't clearly win a single ****ing round.
The Lara fight had an insane scorecard in Alvarez's favor.
Cotto barely got rounds on the scorecards.
Golovkin got one judge to score the fight for him across 2 fights and six scorecards, despite a majority scoring it for Golovkin in both fights, and a huge majority scoring it for Golovkin in the first fight.
The judge corruption surrounding Saul Alvarez is thrown in our faces time and time again. It is not possible to get a fair shake, not even for Floyd ****ing Mayweather Junior. Think about that. The biggest star and most celebrated fighter of the past 20 years could not get fair judging against Alvarez. Every big fight he's been in has had obviously corrupt scoring from at least one judge.
It's ****ing disgraceful and it's why I don't bother with like 90% of fights anymore. Worse yet, you have "fans" who don't even give a **** how corrupt Alvarez fights are because they care more about hating on fighters he fights.
No he did not, Canelo got a draw for being "elusive" while GGG was the headhunter. In the 2nd fight he won for "being" the headhunter this time...
As a GGG stan myself I will acknowledge that he lost the 2nd fight but the first fight was clearly a robbery. Sorry but as long as Canelo fights in Vegas you will not win a decision against him.
Triple L got outboxed in the 1st fight & got the "Mexican Style" beat out of him in the 2nd fight. The boy got beat TWO ways....LMMFAO!
Nelo outboxed Triple L in the 1st fight clearly.
No he did not, Canelo got a draw for being "elusive" while GGG was the headhunter. In the 2nd fight he won for "being" the headhunter this time...
As a GGG stan myself I will acknowledge that he lost the 2nd fight but the first fight was clearly a robbery. Sorry but as long as Canelo fights in Vegas you will not win a decision against him.
Golovkin was robbed, first fight anyway.
As for Lara, it really could've gone either way i felt. Had no problem with Canelo edging it. I thought a draw would've been about right. It was an awful fight though, so i honestly didn't care who got the decision. Lara tried hard to steal the fight without having to fight and Canelo was completely ineffective in trying to do anything to Lara.
Glad they didn't call it a draw though and have to sit through it again. Canelo took the W against Lara and ran with it though, never wanted to prove he can beat him properly. Can't say someone like Floyd ever did that, he rematched Castillo and Maidana after rough close fights so he could prove himself. That is one thing that i'm not liking about Canelo, if he's willing to take debatable wins and not consider a rematch.
I am one of the few who thought that canelo convincingly beat lara. Lara was wide open for body shots that canelo threw and landed. People were too distracted by lara being slick, but forgot the number of times he got tagged. Canelo was straight to the point and effective. Lara was delusional and thought that he won just because he can move. Canelo definitely beat GGG in the 2nd match, and by a wide margin as well. It wasn't even close like the first fight. GGG is washed up at this point, so a trilogy would not make sense as canelo has his number.
There's a difference between one bad scorecard and actually being robbed.
There are only 3 judges in the sport. Having one judge in your pocket is an absolutely humongous advantage. Trying to act like it isn't is absolutely shameful.
Whether you feel it’s a robbery or not the fact is Canelo has never had 1 scorecard in his entire career by
Even 1 judge that wasn’t at least considered very generous.
it’s not a stretch to say that there’s never been 1 card that has a proper scorecard where Canelo lost at least
A couple rounds. Every card he has at 1 round in his favour compared to popular opinion and seems to have 1 judge in pocket
Some examples of this
114-114 Mayweather
118-110 Golovkin
117-111 Lara
119-109 Cotto
None of these cards even come close to representing how the fight was. But no favouritism at all
Lara was robbed without question, so was GGG.
Nice troll thread though.
If they were robbed then name the 7 UNDENIABLE rounds for either of them.
Ill wait :lol1:
Can you agree Larry that based on that one care from the Mayweather fight it’s safe to say canelo all always have the judges in his pocket unless fighting a bigger name like Floyd??
He does get odd scorecards but i feel like he has won all his other fights or they were atleast close enough for a draw..No one else has dominated Canelo
Also how canelo neutralized ggg body attack i hear nobody bringing that up and how canelo was smoking him to the body allnight is just sad that anytime a fight is close they call it a robbery it just shows how bad boxing fans have got in the last 10 years
Golovkin screwed up in both fights by not throwing to the body. However the smoking to the body that Canelo did had very little effect on Golovkin. He didn't fade visibly he didn't get dropped and he didn't retreat from the center of the ring. They were scoring punches yes but they didn't break Golovkin down like your inferring.