Have your views on a Dillian Whyte vs. Deontay Wilder fight changed?

You don't know what anything is, moron. And stop being such a cowardly punk, using insults over the internet you wouldn't have the guts to use irl. That’s a massive contradiction. Ahhhh did the insults offend you? Truth hurts... Nonce...

He's an idiot as far as i'm concerned. As much as I dislike eddie hearn, i think he's put whyte in some advantageous positions no other promoter would have been able to, which has led him to over inflate his true value. I've always maintained that he's just a slight step up over matt skelton or even on the same level as danny williams, hence he has over achieved in his career. That being said Wilder ices him badly as he tends to have stamina lapses in between rounds, and thats a huge no no with deontay.

I don’t watch any “LDBC channels”, I don’t even know what they are tbh😂😂 I actually have a life you see... Anyway, get back to using Hearn IFL tv interview’s as your source of info. Nonce... You don't know what anything is, moron. And stop being such a cowardly punk, using insults over the internet you wouldn't have the guts to use irl.

I've always thought Whyte had a good chance and I still do. Wilder is massively overrated in my opinion while Whyte has improved.

Or maybe I'll bash myself repeatedly over the head with a baseball bat till my brain turns to mush, like yours, then start watching LDBC channels and posting ridiculous crap about Eddie Hearn ... I don’t watch any “LDBC channels”, I don’t even know what they are tbh😂😂 I actually have a life you see... Anyway, get back to using Hearn IFL tv interview’s as your source of info. Nonce...

lmao cant u ever have an exchange with someone without name calling ? evry post i see ur raging about casuals or aj fans I’ll happily have a discussion with rational people but have absolutely no time for the opinion’s of idiots. The opinions of idiots can be very funny. That's why I like chatting shit with you sometimes.

I never said that, you imbecile. Whyte has now proven he is a draw in his last fight. Ortiz tested positive in the build up to the Wilder fight. Whyte tested positive over 7 years ago. How is that even comparable🤣🤣🤣 Get back to watching IFL tv videos yer little nonce... Or maybe I'll bash myself repeatedly over the head with a baseball bat till my brain turns to mush, like yours, then start watching LDBC channels and posting ridiculous crap about Eddie Hearn ...

lmao cant u ever have an exchange with someone without name calling ? evry post i see ur raging about casuals or aj fans I’ll happily have a discussion with rational people but have absolutely no time for the opinion’s of idiots.

I never said that, you imbecile. Whyte has now proven he is a draw in his last fight. Ortiz tested positive in the build up to the Wilder fight. Whyte tested positive over 7 years ago. How is that even comparable🤣🤣🤣 Get back to watching IFL tv videos yer little nonce... lmao cant u ever have an exchange with someone without name calling ? evry post i see ur raging about casuals or aj fans

What happened to all that, "Dillian Shyte ain't a draw and he got busted for PEDs too, just like Ortiz" crap that I was seeing from you guys till quite recently? Bye bye, hypocrite. I never said that, you imbecile. Whyte has now proven he is a draw in his last fight. Ortiz tested positive in the build up to the Wilder fight. Whyte tested positive over 7 years ago. How is that even comparable🤣🤣🤣 Get back to watching IFL tv videos yer little nonce...

Ah okay thanks. I think they were getting towards an acceptable offer when it reached a point the fight date was too close to be realistic. Still think AJ-Whyte II could happen later in the year. I believe Dillian is unhappy about the fact that there's talk of AJ getting a career high payday from the fight, which would be at least 5 times what Dillian would be getting. £5m/£25-£30m. Say it was a £10m/£20m-£25m split, that's still only like 33//66, nothing crazy. Dillian would no doubt play a part in making the rematch a massive spectacle. If you listen to the whole exchange, Whyte says he would rather fight AJ as a mando, even though he would get less money for it than than he's already been offered, because he wouldn't need to accept a rematch clause for a mando, so if he won, he could dictate the terms for a rematch himself.

Time stamped for when they start talking about the rematch clause. Hearn starts talking about the 50/50 split around 24.00. Ah okay thanks. I think they were getting towards an acceptable offer when it reached a point the fight date was too close to be realistic. Still think AJ-Whyte II could happen later in the year. I believe Dillian is unhappy about the fact that there's talk of AJ getting a career high payday from the fight, which would be at least 5 times what Dillian would be getting. £5m/£25-£30m. Say it was a £10m/£20m-£25m split, that's still only like 33//66, nothing crazy. Dillian would no doubt play a part in making the rematch a massive spectacle.

Timestamp for Eddie talking about the 50/50 offer? Time stamped for when they start talking about the rematch clause. Hearn starts talking about the 50/50 split around 24.00.

I heard that interview. Whyte is playing PR games there, trying to get people on his side by only talking about the initial offer he recieved, not the latest offer, in which the rematch money was changed to 50/50 He does exactly the same thing in this IFL interview, then tries to talk over Hearn and keep the discussion focused on the first offer while Hearn is explaining that the rematch clause had been amended to 50/50. Timestamp for Eddie talking about the 50/50 offer?

50/50 in the rematch? Where you pulling that info from? Last I heard (from a Dillian Whyte video interview), they wanted the rematch clause with the same split as the first fight. And that was an interview on Saturday night. I'm not aware of any new "50/50 in rematch" offer? I heard that interview. Whyte is playing PR games there, trying to get people on his side by only talking about the initial offer he recieved, not the latest offer, in which the rematch money was changed to 50/50 He does exactly the same thing in this IFL interview, then tries to talk over Hearn and keep the discussion focused on the first offer while Hearn is explaining that the rematch clause had been amended to 50/50.

Disgusted at a "lowball" offer of $6million+ and a guaranteed 50/50 split for a rematch? 50/50 in the rematch? Where you pulling that info from? Last I heard (from a Dillian Whyte video interview), they wanted the rematch clause with the same split as the first fight. And that was an interview on Saturday night. I'm not aware of any new "50/50 in rematch" offer?

As I explained your comparison is completely irrelevant you little cretin. AJ-Whyte is a far bigger fight than Wilder-Ortiz was. All things considered (failing a PED test, not being a draw whatsoever etc) Ortiz got a good deal. It’s not like he can go and make that kind of money anywhere else. Whyte on the other hand can and has against Chisora. Hearn offered Whyte less against AJ than he received against Chisora. All you Hearniac retards get fooled by the classic flat fee, without analysing the PPV split. I putting you on ignore anyway, you’re deluded kid... What happened to all that, "Dillian Shyte ain't a draw and he got busted for PEDs too, just like Ortiz" crap that I was seeing from you guys till quite recently? Bye bye, hypocrite.

Hearn is AJ's promoter too, you muppet, just like Haymon is both Wilder and Ortiz's "advisor" Should Uncle Al have "advised" Wilder to give Ortiz a 60/40 split, in order to fullfill his obligations to Ortiz? If he had, do you think Wilder would have said, "Ok Al" and gone ahead and done it? As I explained your comparison is completely irrelevant you little cretin. AJ-Whyte is a far bigger fight than Wilder-Ortiz was. All things considered (failing a PED test, not being a draw whatsoever etc) Ortiz got a good deal. It’s not like he can go and make that kind of money anywhere else. Whyte on the other hand can and has against Chisora. Hearn offered Whyte less against AJ than he received against Chisora. All you Hearniac retards get fooled by the classic flat fee, without analysing the PPV split. I putting you on ignore anyway, you’re deluded kid...

Whyte is a far bigger draw than Ortiz And AJ is a far bigger draw than Wilder, when he isn't fighting Tyson Fury, which is why Wilder vs Ortiz wasn't a PPV fight. Did you really need that pointing out, or are you just playing dumb to avoid the truth?

Whyte is a far bigger draw than Ortiz and according to most of you nut huggers AJ is a far bigger draw than Wilder. Therefore making your comparison irrelevant just like your opinion. I have it on very good authority that Whyte was offered less against AJ than he earned against Chisora. As Whyte’s promoter Hearn is obliged to get his fighter the best deal possible, he evidently isn’t doing that for Whyte. Hearn is AJ's promoter too, you muppet, just like Haymon is both Wilder and Ortiz's "advisor" Should Uncle Al have "advised" Wilder to give Ortiz a 60/40 split, in order to fullfill his obligations to Ortiz? If he had, do you think Wilder would have said, "Ok Al" and gone ahead and done it?