WBC have now ordered Wilder vs Fury 2 or goes to purse bid

You made an alt You're lying and I can prove it. Easily. And if Wilder fights Breazeale, I will prove it because I will keep my promise and reveal my identity. You're already trying to wiggle out of keeping up your end of the bargain, but it's legally binding and I will spend whatever it takes to enforce it.

yes please keep tabs on this. if wilder's next opponent isn't fury or joshua, i will post my real name, photo, the name of my promotional company, the TV channels our fights air on around the world, etc. but if wilder's next opponent is fury or joshua, robbie has to quit the site forever and post his real name and photo. Am sure Robbie is seeing the challenge. He seems a brave guy, let's see how it goes.

You said you only posted because you got paid. You said you aren't a fan of boxing. Now you said you aren't getting paid anymore, so why are you here. You spin so much lies and BS you can't keepp up with it yourself. i'm here to make sure you keep your word when wilder doesnt fight breazeale next.

No, they did make it a mandatory, superceding Charlo. Situation was a bit weird though because it clearly wasn't enforcable - as best I could tell they never specified a percentage split so if GGG had chosen to hold out for his Champions split it wouldn't have got made (hence using the threat of remandating Charlo when it looked like Golovkin might consider turning away later on). I did have the links because I researched all this when the fallout from the IBF situation became apparent. Weird thing was the rotation situation between the IBF and the WBC was never clarified by either side before the IBF ordered GGG to face D'Chenko. Far as the WBC was concerned he was still mandated to face their challenger - or at least they never said different. EDIT: ah. here we go. http://www.espn.co.uk/boxing/story/_/id/21949620/wbc-updates-status-world-titles-mandatory-situations I would say that after Canelo failed 2 tests and got suspended, not even Sulaiman dared carry on treating the rescheduled fight as a mandatory defence by Golovkin, which is why the WBC kept quiet and allowed the IBF to go ahead with their mando order. I guess we'll never know if they would have ordered a purse bid for GGG/Canelo in the event of a deal not being struck for the initial date.

The WBC sanctioned an immediate rematch between GGG and Canelo after the first fight ended in a draw, but they didn't make it a mando or order a purse bid. That's one reason I was so surprised when they did that with Wilder and Fury. No, they did make it a mandatory, superceding Charlo. Situation was a bit weird though because it clearly wasn't enforcable - as best I could tell they never specified a percentage split so if GGG had chosen to hold out for his Champions split it wouldn't have got made (hence using the threat of remandating Charlo when it looked like Golovkin might consider turning away later on). I did have the links because I researched all this when the fallout from the IBF situation became apparent. Weird thing was the rotation situation between the IBF and the WBC was never clarified by either side before the IBF ordered GGG to face D'Chenko. Far as the WBC was concerned he was still mandated to face their challenger - or at least they never said different. EDIT: ah. here we go. http://www.espn.co.uk/boxing/story/_/id/21949620/wbc-updates-status-world-titles-mandatory-situations Middleweight: Gennady Golovkin has been mandated to fight a rematch of his September draw against Canelo Alvarez and negotiations are taking place. The fight is likely to happen May 5. With the rematch nearly finalized, the WBC ordered mandatory challenger Jermall Charlo to face Hugo Centeno for the vacant interim belt.

They ordered it, but didn't say anything about a purse bid if negotiations didn't work out. That didn't seem like an actual mandated fight to me. wbc trying to help speed things up to make sure the fight happens before the summer. in the ggg canelo scenario, there was nothing to speed up because everyone knows canelo fights cinco and independence.

yes the ggg rematch was mando. They ordered it, but didn't say anything about a purse bid if negotiations didn't work out. That didn't seem like an actual mandated fight to me.

I know. I hope he never stops :lol1: i will stop if wilder fights breazeae next

The WBC sanctioned an immediate rematch between GGG and Canelo after the first fight ended in a draw, but they didn't make it a mando or order a purse bid. That's one reason I was so surprised when they did that with Wilder and Fury. yes the ggg rematch was mando.

That guy is pure comedy gold! I know. I hope he never stops :lol1:

:lol1: :lol1: That guy is pure comedy gold!

Ummm. Not sure. Nothing springs to mind. Again going back to GGG - Canelo pretty sure they were going to negotiate it out anyway, but they probably hadn't sat down before the WBC jumped in and made it a mando. The WBC sanctioned an immediate rematch between GGG and Canelo after the first fight ended in a draw, but they didn't make it a mando or order a purse bid. That's one reason I was so surprised when they did that with Wilder and Fury.

What I was wondering about was whether a purse bid had ever been ordered between two sides who were in the process of trying to negotiate a voluntary defence. Ummm. Not sure. Nothing springs to mind. Again going back to GGG - Canelo pretty sure they were going to negotiate it out anyway, but they probably hadn't sat down before the WBC jumped in and made it a mando.

if you lose, i can't stop you from making a fake name and you likely will, but if i lose i will never post here again because after i reveal who i am, it wouldnt be safe anymore to post insider info. :lol1: :lol1:

we just spent a long time operating a joint account trying to use a unified style. so obviously we're going to post similarly. :lol1: :lol1:

They installed Canelo mandatory over the head of Jermall Charlo, so I don't see why not. Besides, who's gonna stop 'em? EDIT: And there's been loads of mando purse bids, man. They happen all the time. Hooker vs Saucedo was a recent one. Couple more here. http://www.espn.co.uk/boxing/story/_/id/22370538/purse-bids-were-called-two-title-bouts It's unusual when there's really big names / money involved though cos typically the orgs know they can't force 'em to do shit and they don't want to lose their slice. What I was wondering about was whether a purse bid had ever been ordered between two sides who were in the process of trying to negotiate a voluntary defence.

Your friend posts the exact same style as you does he? GTFOH You're a joke. You'll just make another account. ****ing weirdo. we just spent a long time operating a joint account trying to use a unified style. so obviously we're going to post similarly. if you lose, i can't stop you from making a fake name and you likely will, but if i lose i will never post here again because after i reveal who i am, it wouldnt be safe anymore to post insider info. but youre done. we both know breazeale isnt next. you know you ****ed up and thats why youre squirming.

Well. For sure it can't be Mauricio lying through his teeth, the man just radiates honesty and integrity for fucks, sake. Just look at that face. I'd trust him with my life. ...or maybe with someone's else's life. If I didn't like them very much. :lol1: :lol1:

I posted this in response to someone who asked that same question in another thread: So either Breazeale has been paid, or otherwise pursuaded, to step aside, or Sulaiman is lying through his teeth in that video. Well. For sure it can't be Mauricio lying through his teeth, the man just radiates honesty and integrity for fucks, sake. Just look at that face. I'd trust him with my life. ...or maybe with someone's else's life. If I didn't like them very much.

They installed Canelo mandatory over the head of Jermall Charlo, so I don't see why not. Besides, who's gonna stop 'em? EDIT: And there's been loads of mando purse bids, man. They happen all the time. Hooker vs Saucedo was a recent one. Couple more here. http://www.espn.co.uk/boxing/story/_/id/22370538/purse-bids-were-called-two-title-bouts It's unusual when there's really big names / money involved though cos typically the orgs know they can't force 'em to do shit and they don't want to lose their slice. I posted this in response to someone who asked that same question in another thread: According to Sulaiman, the WBC gave Breazeale a signed contract stating that his proposed fight with Stiverne would be a final eliminator, with the winner becoming their mandatory. But Stiverne ended up going straight into a title fight after Ortiz failed a PED test. Again, according to Sulaiman, that meant they were legally required to make Breazeale their mandatory challenger if he won his next fight, against Molina. El Presidente himself explains the situation here: So either Breazeale has been paid, or otherwise pursuaded, to step aside, or Sulaiman is lying through his teeth in that video.