Does Dillian Whyte deserve another shot and Joshua

The Wilder fight proved it was no fluke. Now we're talking in circles. It's pointless. Back to the embarrassing yourself statement. I can't pound boxing knowledge or common sense into you enough to overcome your fandom so I'm really not responding to you anymore on this topic and will not be returning to this thread. respond if you like but I won't be reading. Bye. Fury was lucky a good ref was at the center of the ring. Some would have called if off immediately he kissed the canvas. I don't give a fvvk if you respond or not. Once I make my point, am okay. Once again, there is no king without a throne and there is no champ without a defence. Even charlse Martin had a defence. Good night kiddy.

You can't be seen as one of the best fighters in history if you have no title defence. Stop lieing to yourself. That will be the foolish thing to do. Until fury wins a belt and defend it, his wlad one night fight is a fluke. The Wilder fight proved it was no fluke. Now we're talking in circles. It's pointless. Back to the embarrassing yourself statement. I can't pound boxing knowledge or common sense into you enough to overcome your fandom so I'm really not responding to you anymore on this topic and will not be returning to this thread. respond if you like but I won't be reading. Bye.

make no mistake, this is a good fight for engaldna and will be a major event. it might even be fun. dillian white is one of the many things eddie hearn has been hiding his man behind. that's why people have an issue with this fight chiefly! there's also the fact that it's a rematch of a mismatch. yeah, the chisora fights were good, but FFS the guy needed two of them to get a clean win! if deontay wilder needed two fights to beat 9 loss journeyman chisora you'd be crucifying him. How many matches does he need to beat a inactivity man of 3yrs and a rehab patient!?

What does this conversation have to do with legacy dude? You're delusional. Just stop embarrassing yourself. You can't be seen as one of the best fighters in history if you have no title defence. Stop lieing to yourself. That will be the foolish thing to do. Until fury wins a belt and defend it, his wlad one night fight is a fluke.

make no mistake, this is a good fight for engaldna and will be a major event. it might even be fun. dillian white is one of the many things eddie hearn has been hiding his man behind. that's why people have an issue with this fight chiefly! there's also the fact that it's a rematch of a mismatch. yeah, the chisora fights were good, but FFS the guy needed two of them to get a clean win! if deontay wilder needed two fights to beat 9 loss journeyman chisora you'd be crucifying him.

You still have your opinion which I don't have a problem with. My fact still remains that Fury has never had a title defence till date. Name me on champion without a defence. Fury has no legacy until he defends a title. What does this conversation have to do with legacy dude? You're delusional. Just stop embarrassing yourself.

will be fun while it lasts, why not, wilder isn't fighting aj next. aj isn't fighting ortiz

Lol that you think a set of opinions is facts. That's why I don't take you seriously. You don't even know you're a delusional fanboy troll. :loser: You still have your opinion which I don't have a problem with. My fact still remains that Fury has never had a title defence till date. Name me on champion without a defence. Fury has no legacy until he defends a title.

Well, I have giving you facts. The rest is left for you to comprehend. You are still missing the point. A supposedly king is mandated to defend his throne or hez no king at all. One lucky fight don't announce you as a king. Fury has never had any defence fight, so how do we know how he reacts to challengers. Hez as good as bowe dropping a belt but in Fury's case, he dropped all the belts with out a defence. That's cawordice. Lol that you think a set of opinions is facts. That's why I don't take you seriously. You don't even know you're a delusional fanboy troll. :loser:

Ahahahaha! Man you're delusional. I'm over this conversation. Have a good Sunday fella. Well, I have giving you facts. The rest is left for you to comprehend.

You are still missing the point. A supposedly king is mandated to defend his throne or hez no king at all. One lucky fight don't announce you as a king. Fury has never had any defence fight, so how do we know how he reacts to challengers. Hez as good as bowe dropping a belt but in Fury's case, he dropped all the belts with out a defence. That's cawordice. Ahahahaha! Man you're delusional. I'm over this conversation. Have a good Sunday fella.

He beat the best HW on the planet once and arguably just did it again. There's not much to doubt about Fury anymore. (aside from possible ped use) You are still missing the point. A supposedly king is mandated to defend his throne or hez no king at all. One lucky fight don't announce you as a king. Fury has never had any defence fight, so how do we know how he reacts to challengers. Hez as good as bowe dropping a belt but in Fury's case, he dropped all the belts with out a defence. That's cawordice.

To prove how good you are, you must defend your belts. A single meaningful fight don't define how great you are. You must defend your titles. A must. I mean, a must. He beat the best HW on the planet once and arguably just did it again. There's not much to doubt about Fury anymore. (aside from possible ped use)

Whyte quite probably does deserve a title shot but like many others, I'm not at all interested in seeing him against Joshua again and certainly won't be paying for it. I'd much rather see him against Wilder or even Fury because he hasn't fought them before and think that it would give us a clearer idea of how good he is. I've got my doubts about Whyte being good enough to be one of the top HW boxers out there... while he has amassed wins over the last few years (including a couple of really good KO') and obviously developed a lot as a fighter, I think he is just that... a fighter and hasn't really fought top level guys. In my view he loses to Fury (Fury simply out boxes him) and Joshua (he is just too powerful as well as being the better boxer), so the only one of the top three that I'm unsure about it Wilder... In my view and despite his improvements as a top HW, Whyte is still to easy to hit and I think if Parker can knock him down then Wilder can certainly get a KO. With that being said though, Whyte can take a punch (look at AJ vs Whyte) and has some firepower of his own... not to mention being mentally tough, so if he can survive a Wilder onslaught, it could be interesting. Also for the record, when Usyk acclimates at HW I think he beats Whyte handily too. If we have to see Whyte and Joshua again, let it be after Joshua vs Wilder and Fury vs Whyte - providing all the starts align, of course. Wilder doesn't want anything to do with whyte for the past two years. So this is really irrelevant. Hez the best deserving challenger right now and there are only two champions at the moment.

What does that have to do with how good he is? Absolutely nothing. To prove how good you are, you must defend your belts. A single meaningful fight don't define how great you are. You must defend your titles. A must. I mean, a must.

Lol! I didn't say anything about Ortiz. Who the F are you talking to? I think you're confused in your troll quest. smiles... I don't expect you to understand.

Whyte quite probably does deserve a title shot but like many others, I'm not at all interested in seeing him against Joshua again and certainly won't be paying for it. I'd much rather see him against Wilder or even Fury because he hasn't fought them before and think that it would give us a clearer idea of how good he is. I've got my doubts about Whyte being good enough to be one of the top HW boxers out there... while he has amassed wins over the last few years (including a couple of really good KO') and obviously developed a lot as a fighter, I think he is just that... a fighter and hasn't really fought top level guys. In my view he loses to Fury (Fury simply out boxes him) and Joshua (he is just too powerful as well as being the better boxer), so the only one of the top three that I'm unsure about it Wilder... In my view and despite his improvements as a top HW, Whyte is still to easy to hit and I think if Parker can knock him down then Wilder can certainly get a KO. With that being said though, Whyte can take a punch (look at AJ vs Whyte) and has some firepower of his own... not to mention being mentally tough, so if he can survive a Wilder onslaught, it could be interesting. Also for the record, when Usyk acclimates at HW I think he beats Whyte handily too. If we have to see Whyte and Joshua again, let it be after Joshua vs Wilder and Fury vs Whyte - providing all the starts align, of course.

no one wants that rematch right now. Exactly! Thank you very much!

he got up against wilder, that's pretty fine and most people including me think he won the fight. That aside, he was under less cos he was the challenger with many excuses on his side in case he looses. But the fact is fury has never defended a belt so far in his career. We don't need to argue about that. What does that have to do with how good he is? Absolutely nothing.

yeah, because you are beginning to sound like a wilder fan girl. You want to credit wilders win to discredit wlad win. And everybody knows that wlad >>>> Ortiz. Nobody argues that, not even a retard. Lol! I didn't say anything about Ortiz. Who the F are you talking to? I think you're confused in your troll quest.