you don't know **** about boxing.
I guess I know **** about boxing. I had Wilder winning the first fifth ninth, twelveth and possibly the second. I'm not a fan of either guy but Wilder is getting crapped on unfairly. There was an interview with Teddy Atlas titles Wilder gets exposed. Didn't bother to view it. How the hell did Wilder get exposed. Everyone knew he wasn't a great boxer going . It's ridiculous. It's just another example of people piling on. I thought he did pretty damned well against a supposedly elite boxer. By the way sticking your tongue out, fist pumping after every round, mugging for the camera, etc don't score points.
I'm for it but i'd prefer he rotated, one in the US, then one in the uk, then one in the US
but outside of wilder i'm not sure he can sell vs randoms in the US
Ok I can totally agree with this
How awesome would it be wilder vs AJ in msg then the rematch in Wembley? Is it that fawking hard to make ??
Can't understand how people still think AJ is no.1
Fury has two better results than anything AJ has done.
AJ just fights old men and leftovers. In Parker, he fought one fighter that wasn't old and could actually use his legs and AJ couldn't even lay a glove on him. He won by virtue of having a longer reach and Parker not being able to get close to do any work because of the ref.
No wonder Hearn is protecting him. He'll only feed him old men or big stiff idiots that are similar to him but worse.
They’re called fanboys...
Some of them will even claim AJ’s win over Wlad was better than Fury’s😂😂😂
A decent thread but come on, Klitschko was good that night against AJ and anyone who says different is clueless or plain lying.
He really wasn’t...
He was shot of confidence and couldn’t pull the punches anymore. His timing was off, he was slower on his feet, he got caught much more regularly. But what else can you expect from a 41 yr old, 18 month inactive fighter who was coming off the back of a humiliating loss?
You keep buying into that Sky Sports narrative though👍🏻
AJ has wins over Klitschko's corpse, Povetkin and Parker. Wilder has nothing lol.
A decent thread but come on, Klitschko was good that night against AJ and anyone who says different is clueless or plain lying.
The only people who don't think he beat Wilder are bias americans
I’m an American and I believe he won. Bro how do you feel about AJ fighting in the states for cross over appeal like the man in your avi and like the klit bros did
Can't understand how people still think AJ is no.1
Fury has two better results than anything AJ has done.
AJ just fights old men and leftovers. In Parker, he fought one fighter that wasn't old and could actually use his legs and AJ couldn't even lay a glove on him. He won by virtue of having a longer reach and Parker not being able to get close to do any work because of the ref.
No wonder Hearn is protecting him. He'll only feed him old men or big stiff idiots that are similar to him but worse.
Lolx.... Cry baby. Am sure this will make you feel better.
Are you implying that Wilder's wins over Stiverne and Ortiz are comparable to Fury's wins over Klitschko in Germany and Wilder in America?
No. Just cos you said he has no wins. Ortiz is a really good win. And Stiverne at the time was well regarded.
Tyson Fury is the most talented HW on the planet, and also the best.
People seem to forget that Fury had to lose 100lbs and came off a TWO YEAR coke and booze binge, and still schooled one of the most dangerous men in boxing. Most people thought he won every round other than the knockdowns, and even in those rounds he boxed the **** out of Wilder.
Klitschko had barely lost a round in 12 years and Fury made it look easy, there wasn't a single moment in that fight that Fury wasn't in control, and don't forget that an older, inactive Wlad was one punch away from knocking AJ clean out.
There's a reason why Joshua won't fight Fury, it's because he knows he'll get completely dominated both inside and outside the ring.
Just imagine how good Fury could've been, or still could be, if he had the same dedication in the gym as say a Scott Quigg?
He didn't beat Wilder unless you thought he should have got the decision. I had Wilder barely edging him out. A draw is fine.
wilder "won" the Fury fight due to racism in boxing against white fighters
Wilder has Ortiz, and no matter how silly it seems now, Stiverne who was also top 10.
Fury is the only one with real top top level wins though. Wins that you cant really poke a hole in (you know, if you gave him the win on your card).
Are you implying that Wilder's wins over Stiverne and Ortiz are comparable to Fury's wins over Klitschko in Germany and Wilder in America?
He didn't beat Wilder unless you thought he should have got the decision. I had Wilder barely edging him out. A draw is fine.
you don't know **** about boxing.
I made a thread about it straight after the fight because it always happens over time that the result actually gets accepted as fact
Wilder winning is impossible unless you give him clear Fury rounds in which he was comprehensively outboxed
Nobody thought wilder won until proven otherwise.
On fight night night in the 12 th round it was accepted fury won story of fight and was ahead. A knockdown in 9th might have made fury fans a little nervous but by the 12 th as long as fury stayed in feet it should be in the bag. If course 12th round knockdown made a comfortable win a little less comfirtable.
But a draw was still a shock. Forget talk of a wilder win, it only exists in imagination
Wilder has Ortiz, and no matter how silly it seems now, Stiverne who was also top 10.
Fury is the only one with real top top level wins though. Wins that you cant really poke a hole in (you know, if you gave him the win on your card).