What class is Joshua, Fury, and Wilder in compared to the fighters in the 90's

Division is overrated. Joshua is *****, and Wilder will ko him, but Wilder is not anything but a big punch and long reach. Both guys are weak if in another era. Yep, like clockwork. The writing is on the wall for Wilder so the division will be **** again to suit clear agendas. More will follow you with this way of thinking. Wilder can only KO complete bums or those who have zero stamina like Ortiz. When he gets in there with a prime fighter like AJ who has superior skill, you'll see Wilder go bye bye. Not long to go now.

ortiz was rated higher than parker both in the world and in the organization whyte was defending a title for. so unless hearn considered parker the easier fight, it makes absolutely no sense to fight parker. you dont think hearn is an idiot do you? Joshua is an ATG compared to that air hitting joke you call a champion. Not long now. Wilder the hypejob will be finished soon. Then you little rats can get to calling the division **** just to smear AJ. Even though you freaks said the division is back on top now because an American is involved. Haha. Division is overrated. Joshua is *****, and Wilder will ko him, but Wilder is not anything but a big punch and long reach. Both guys are weak if in another era.

Parker had the higher ranking and was more credible than Ortiz. ortiz was rated higher than parker both in the world and in the organization whyte was defending a title for. so unless hearn considered parker the easier fight, it makes absolutely no sense to fight parker. you dont think hearn is an idiot do you?

No, Hearn knew the IBF would strip Joshua if he didn't defend it. The WBA aren't as strict. That's why it went the way it did. False. WBA was next in rotation and it would have been illegal for the IBF to strip AJ for fighting Ortiz. This is long settled federal law. You're a fan that doesn't know any better, so you just believe every word Hearn says even when he's blatantly lying to try to fool you.

Joshua sucks. He only beat a geriatric kitschko, and barely. Joshua is an ATG compared to that air hitting joke you call a champion. Not long now. Wilder the hypejob will be finished soon. Then you little rats can get to calling the division **** just to smear AJ. Even though you freaks said the division is back on top now because an American is involved. Haha.

Who said he was a great fighter? I said he's deserving of respect. Great is subjective. You can decide that for yourself. But Peter still accomplished more than most could ever dream of and there's no reason to **** on the guy unless you just hate your life and you're trying to make yourself feel better. You were trying to make out being WBC champ and a puncher is something to praise. I gave you a decent fighter who was WBC champ and a puncher to show it's nothing to praise in any way. It's not that you have low standards, it's because you're paid to set the narrative and smear the opposition. I just want you to know that it isn't working so you're wasting your time. You're just coming off as an idiot. Give it up.

Was Henry Cooper ever undefeated WBC heavyweight champion of the world? Had Boxrec existed, would he have ever been #2 in the world? Who cares if Wilder is undefeated WBC champion of the world? It means little when you've beaten no one for it. Do you think Smith is better than fighters who have never won a world title because he's was once undefeated world champion? How you haven't logged off in shame by now is testament to how fixated you are in smearing AJ and Hearn. You're a joke.

No, I'm smearing the WBA for being in Hearn's back pocket and allowing the IBF to cut the line when it was the WBA's turn. No, you were saying Hearn likes IBF mandatories because they're easy. Hearn doesn't control the IBF rankings. And if you want to be undisputed, you need the IBF title. They're not just going to drop it you fool. But you used that as a way to smear AJ and Hearn like you always do. **** off.

That's still better than fighting Parker for absolutely nothing. If Ortiz is the easier fight, why would you fight the harder fight for less at stake? Doesn't make any sense. Clearly Hearn didn't consider Parker the harder fight. Parker had the higher ranking and was more credible than Ortiz. More proven as well. If Whyte had to wait 2 years for a shot at the WBC title, then I think it's safe to say there was nothing on the line for Whyte in that fight. To even try and suggest there was is nothing short of laughable.

They allowed the IBF to cut the line even though it was Ortiz's turn. The WBA would have absolutely no reason to do that unless Hearn wanted them to. No, Hearn knew the IBF would strip Joshua if he didn't defend it. The WBA aren't as strict. That's why it went the way it did. Ortiz would have got his shot next but he instead wanted an easier fight because he thought he could beat Wilder and make more money in the Joshua fight having the WBC title with him.

A focused Fury with his size and skills would give anybody problems of any era. Wilder's right hand is legit and always has a chance but skills would beat him AJ is big, strong and skilled but does not do anything extraordinary, only time will tell with him

Joshua had a first mandatory ,that was Pulev. Povetkin was also a mandatory Wrong. In order for Joshua and Klitschko to get the WBA to sanction their fight, they had to promise to fight Ortiz next as the WBA mandatory. This is long before Povetkin was even under consideration as a WBA mandatory.

The WBA was vacant so they didn't have any pointed mandatory so how could Ortiz claim any nonsense that he gave AJ permission to fight Pulev? Because Joshua vs Klitschko was only sanctioned for the WBA super title on the condition that the winner must face Ortiz next. So once Joshua won, Ortiz was guaranteed the first mandatory. The WBA was next in the rotation in front of the IBF. It was unheard of for the WBA to voluntarily let the IBF skip the line. The WBA would have absolutely no reason to do that unless that is what Hearn wanted.

Joshua is the number 1 in the division for a reason. It's the same reason he has the best resume as well. So sort yourself out, man. Delusion is not a good look. Joshua sucks. He only beat a geriatric kitschko, and barely.

The only difference I've noticed from that era as opposed today's era was that guys back then were a lot hungrier and wanted it more. Nowadays, you've got heavyweights who are leaving tens of millions of dollars on the table in order to protect there undefeated records. They are often spoon fed and protected. Moreover, they are reluctant to take on the greatest risks and challenges out there. They fight whenever and whoever they want whenever they so please; While the boxing fan can be damned. They are neither crowd pleasing or fan friendly as opposed to the 1990s heavyweights who often gave boxing fans the fights that they demanded to see.

Peter was a great fighter because he beat a shot, fat Toney, a bum in McCline, and a shot Maskaev? Who said he was a great fighter? I said he's deserving of respect. Great is subjective. You can decide that for yourself. But Peter still accomplished more than most could ever dream of and there's no reason to **** on the guy unless you just hate your life and you're trying to make yourself feel better.

You're now smearing Hearn because of IBF mandatories even though Hearn has nothing to do with their rankings? No, I'm smearing the WBA for being in Hearn's back pocket and allowing the IBF to cut the line when it was the WBA's turn.

What fights has Joshua avoided to take on easier mandatories Vast majority of experts would consider Ortiz a tougher fight than Pulev. Vast majority of experts would consider Wilder a tougher fight than Povetkin.

A guaranteed shot at the WBC? You mean wait 2 years before getting a shot? That's still better than fighting Parker for absolutely nothing. If Ortiz is the easier fight, why would you fight the harder fight for less at stake? Doesn't make any sense. Clearly Hearn didn't consider Parker the harder fight.

Show me evidence the WBA will do anything Hearn tells them to? They allowed the IBF to cut the line even though it was Ortiz's turn. The WBA would have absolutely no reason to do that unless Hearn wanted them to.