Remember when this fight was almost as difficult to make as Joshua v Wilder?
Ultimately it didn't happen, and both guys went on separate paths. But if these 2 stepped into the ring at 130/135, who would have won?
Broner would have beat him then as he would beat him now. I don't like Broner and don't think he was ever all that good but he was and is a better fighter than Burns. Burns is game with lots of heart and he is an overachiever while Broner is an underachiever. But Broner has more skill, a better chin and a lot more power.
Broner i think would have won a UD and prob drop Burns at that point.
Burns would have had his moments but he just dosent have the power to really keep Broner honest and AB was a bigger stronger and faster at lightweight Burns would be outmatched in every category.