Bob Arum: Lomachenko beats Mayweather at 135lbs...

Prime JLC? Nah he did'nt. Only people he lost to in his prime was Floyd and Corrales. Corrales eventually beat the prime out of him (well they beat the prime out of each other). And Floyd is Floyd. So no, you're wrong. Says the person who brought up the Salido loss. Moving on...

Bob should have said at 126lbs...

This is such a weird and horrendous argument. JLC fought and lost against far worse opposition than Lomachenko AND Salido. Whether or not Loma dropped a tight decision to a multi world champion in his second pro fight literally means nothing now and pulling up that argument makes me wonder how much you actually know about Lomachenko. Prime JLC? Nah he did'nt. Only people he lost to in his prime was Floyd and Corrales. Corrales eventually beat the prime out of him (well they beat the prime out of each other). And Floyd is Floyd. So no, you're wrong.

No one can say with certainty either way but I have Loma winning a tight decision maybe even a draw. And to McDonald's suck a fart that your in the red with all your hate and anti-american bull chit. I'm not a loma hater. He's top 2 p4p with my bae Canelo. There is no shame in the commie getting KO'd by Mr.TBE :dance:

Floyd at age 26 was a 2 weight lineal champion beating p4p guys. The same age Lomachenko was getting beat by shop worn Salido. Completely idiotic to not mention Lomachenko's age but use the 2nd supposed pro fight excuse doe. Maybe Lomachenko should've turned pro sooner instead of beating kids padding his amateur career. Using moron logic is typical of limey Floyd haters. Omg you just destroyed these eastern euro wannabes :rofl: :rofl:

Well considering he was a top level old school pressure fighter who could fight on the inside with the best of them and those kinds of fighters don't exist today, i think that's a very valid argument. UNLESS you'd like to enlighten me on someone Lomachenko has beat with those same qualities? Only person he has ever fought who comes close, but not very close, he lost to. So yea...sorry to say, you're probably wrong about this one. This is such a weird and horrendous argument. JLC fought and lost against far worse opposition than Lomachenko AND Salido. Whether or not Loma dropped a tight decision to a multi world champion in his second pro fight literally means nothing now and pulling up that argument makes me wonder how much you actually know about Lomachenko.

Loma beats MW

lol I literally watched his entire career :lol1: this is the thing you have to deal with on this site. If someone disagrees with you, you think they don't know the subject at hand. People have a tendency to believe former fighters are better than current ones. I don't always think that, and I for sure don't think JLC was better than Lomachenko in a head-to-head battle. Well considering he was a top level old school pressure fighter who could fight on the inside with the best of them and those kinds of fighters don't exist today, i think that's a very valid argument. UNLESS you'd like to enlighten me on someone Lomachenko has beat with those same qualities? Only person he has ever fought who comes close, but not very close, he lost to. So yea...sorry to say, you're probably wrong about this one.

Floyd was an animal at 130 and 135. No way Loma deals with all that work and come out victorious. Floyd is 100 times better than Linares in every aspect of boxing. That argument works both ways. A hell of a lot worse fighters than Lomachenko gave Floyd trouble at those weights.

Mayweather vs. Loma would be one HELL of a fight. Definitely one for the time machine.

i would make for a interesting fight because floyd was not as defensive as the heavier weights....my eye ball test says Loma work rate would trouble floyd (castillo who was not as defensively aware as loma gave floyd hell base on work rate). i would favor loma by UD

Floyd at age 26 was a 2 weight lineal champion beating p4p guys. The same age Lomachenko was getting beat by shop worn Salido. Completely idiotic to not mention Lomachenko's age but use the 2nd supposed pro fight excuse doe. Maybe Lomachenko should've turned pro sooner instead of beating kids padding his amateur career. Using moron logic is typical of limey Floyd haters. Yeah, we all know age is the determining factor in boxing skills :lol1: In one thread I'm a 'fl0mo' in another i'm a floyd hater. haha. hilarious.

Floyd ud But arum saying this is meaningless . He is obviously gonna say it

Lomachenko - “I’m not yet comfortable at 135, but I will be” Arum - “yeah, loma could easily beat the best ever at 135”

Floyd wouldn't get knocked down by Linares or beat by Salido

No one can say with certainty either way but I have Loma winning a tight decision maybe even a draw. And to McDonald's suck a fart that your in the red with all your hate and anti-american bull chit.

No bob is a promoter when he promoted floyd m, Mayweather was the best fighter since Ali now Loma who is admittedly great, Crawford, pax all would have beaten him? How come no one did?

I agree with this. Watch some Floyd fights at 130. I recommend Chavez and Corrales. There is more to choose from.

Floyd was an animal at 130 and 135. No way Loma deals with all that work and come out victorious. Floyd is 100 times better than Linares in every aspect of boxing.

I agree with this.