Is GGG the eastern euro Adrien Broner ????

If we are looking at pro achievements, I'd put people like Usyk and Crawford before Loma. Mikey too. Yeah, I guess because Usyk and Bud unified, Mikey because he's a 4 divisions world champ. I guess you also counting them being undefeated. The more important to me if the quality of oppo and I think Loma has beaten better oppo by miles. I'd rather take quality over numbers and titles. Sure Loma has a loss, but that's due to the fact AGAIN that he fought better oppo than those guys, and this much earlier in his career. I refuse to bash Loma for a SD loss to Salido in his second pro fight, that's quite a good result if you ask me. I truly believe had Mikey fought Salidoe in his second pro fight, he would get put on a stretcher. People act like he had 400 amateur fight and had experience but so had GGG and G waited 30 fights to fight someone as good as Salido. Overall Loma is 12 fights and has beaten better oppo than those guys who are around 30 fights (except Usyk). I want to reward risk, this is how you chase greatness. Only Canelo took more risks and beat better oppo than Loma, that's the only dude I would put over, people overrate undefeated fighters (they forgot they had Broner P4P next king until he lost his 0) and Nelo is being underrated next to those guys because he lost to Floyd, but so would those guys. I would only give a shot to Loma to beat Floyd and only at 130, I'm not saying he would beat him, I 'm saying I'm give him a decent shot. Probably Bud at 140 has a decent shot too, but they would be rightfully underdogs.

Lets take a look at the similarities 1. Products of the HBO "Hype machine" 2. Compared to legends by the boxing media. Broner = Mayweather GGG= Hagler 3. On P4P lists before having an impressive name on their resume 4. Struggled once they stepped up in competition 5. Don't really have impressive wins over a notable opponent 6. Walked out of the ring after their first loss You are an embarrassment to all American fans that like to watch boxing. Your up their with being considered one of the worst biased posters their is on this site. You are a disgrace.

AB jumped from 135-147 in one fight...he skipped 140 and went from 135 to 147 after leaving 130...GGG wouldn’t even go from 160-168 to fight Ward...AB is levels above GGG when it comes to risk taking and pursuing greatness

GGG hasn't beaten anyone either. If broner beats pacquiao he will surpass the lit gee easily. He beat your boy twice, Im a canelo fan but not a chance in hell he beat ggg in either fight. No way i dont care what anyone says. GGG is one of the best middleweights of all time.

i see what the OP is doing no golovkin is better than broner.....i get that hes trying to get under the skin of the gggroupies but why is the same guys come in and defend golovkin over and over and never blame him for ANYTHING? its literally always pointing the finger at someone else or pointing to "top 10 mw opponents"...when these same clowns will crap on more accomplished fighters than golovkin citing the same problems?....

Gtfo with usyk higher than Loma. I don't see how p4p he could be until he fights elite fighters. USYK is looking really good vs b cruisers in the weakest division in boxing imo outside of 118. He's going to be another hype job once he fights elite talent. Loma at least fought some killers like rigo and Walters. USYK record http://boxrec.com/en/boxer/659772 He's basically beterbiev as a cruiser.

Eastern Europe = Half the world, apparently.

TBH honnest I don't have any issue to call somebody like Loma great bro. 2 gold medal OG in 2 divs almost make you a great of the boxing world, sure in the amateur department. 12 fights as a pro, 3 divisions champ, wins over Rigo, Walters, LInares, Russel Jr, Martinez, if it ain't great then I don't know what should be called great. I would not be mad if someone called Bud or Mikey great too, I believe they are. If we are looking at pro achievements, I'd put people like Usyk and Crawford before Loma. Mikey too.

I do like all the boxers I listed above, but none stands alone to be called great. As I said, they all have a window of time to do something special. I love boxing, bro. TBH honnest I don't have any issue to call somebody like Loma great bro. 2 gold medal OG in 2 divs almost make you a great of the boxing world, sure in the amateur department. 12 fights as a pro, 3 divisions champ, wins over Rigo, Walters, LInares, Russel Jr, Martinez, if it ain't great then I don't know what should be called great. I would not be mad if someone called Bud or Mikey great too, I believe they are.

So there is no great fighters in current boxing for you. Maybe your standard is too high and your wiews of the sport is too cynical bro. Yeah, Davis is something bro, he's young and already a killer, I hope he doesn't end up Broner like man, I'm just worried about his mindset and people around him, we'll see. I do like all the boxers I listed above, but none stands alone to be called great. As I said, they all have a window of time to do something special. I love boxing, bro.

None, but some have the potential to be, with better competition: Canelo Spence Davis Lomachenko Usyk Crawford Above and a few more have that potential if they separate themselves from the herd in the next few/several years. They can do this by facing the best out there, one after another if possible. Davis, you better listen up, man! So there is no great fighters in current boxing for you. Maybe your standard is too high and your wiews of the sport is too cynical bro. Yeah, Davis is something bro, he's young and already a killer, I hope he doesn't end up Broner like man, I'm just worried about his mindset and people around him, we'll see.

Who has the lit gee beat? You better pray Broner doesn't beat pacquiao because if he does he will surely surpass the lit gee. :dance: if broner beats pac he is the fighter of the decade and larry is god

broner had the courage to move up 3 divisions. he did that for boxing glory dont let anyone tell you otherwise. wasnt weight or anything like that. he had already dominated every single division he was in when he faced the julian jackson of our era maidana and lost a debatable decision. ggg meanwhile got schooled by jacobs and canelo twice and was about to lose to kell brook. please dont compare them

Which 4 divisions were those? And what champs were those? lol Who has the lit gee beat? You better pray Broner doesn't beat pacquiao because if he does he will surely surpass the lit gee. :dance:

Will GGG be remembered as a 4 division champ like AB? Doubt it. There's levels to this. Which 4 divisions were those? And what champs were those? lol

AB takes more risks than GGG.. i give him the edge off that alone. Golovkin has never made a sacrifice to make a meaningful fight happen. Brother who this delicious candy? https://i.makeagif.com/media/10-16-2018/AJH1H3.gif

LOL! Anyone comparing Broner and Golovkin is a joke. But there are quite a few joke posters on this site.

Then who is great in this era right now? None, but some have the potential to be, with better competition: Canelo Spence Davis Lomachenko Usyk Crawford Above and a few more have that potential if they separate themselves from the herd in the next few/several years. They can do this by facing the best out there, one after another if possible. Davis, you better listen up, man!

No Fuuck Broner the guy is a racist pos who beat nothing but bums to get his bogus titles. Gggs wins over Brook, Jacobs and close fights with Canelo are waaaaaaay better fights than anything Broner has done. And I’m faaaar from a ggg fan you can look up my history. GGG hasn't beaten anyone either. If broner beats pacquiao he will surpass the lit gee easily.

It says that Canelo is a good fighter, like GGG, not great. Greats separate themselves from the good ones. I'm a semi Canelo fan but I've never for once thought he was anything great. GGG is a grade lower. Then who is great in this era right now?