How can it be right Nelo gets so many favourable decisions?

hes backed by good money and big names, he never wins his big fights decisively. still a good fighter tho

Pro Canelo crowd and being the A side probably influences a bit. But I think the main reason is in all of his close fights he landed the cleaner more powerful punches. Lara, GGG and Trout all landed more jabs/total punches but Canelo was the one doing more damage and judges usually like that. Maidana was 2 times more aggressive than nelo was against ggg, with Floyd and said he ruined floyd. Floyd was probably peeing blood.? Nobody who's fought Floyd even feel they've been in a fight.

It seems like most people in boxing seem to have Ggg winner in the 2nd fight also. Why is it Nelo can never have a competitive fight go against him? How can be have that much luck.? Ggg hardly ever goes distance. Don't he deserve just a fraction of luck Nell gets? So most people in Boxing had GGG the winner ... Except his coach who told him in the middle of the fight They were Losing . Abel also said he thought it was a draw . But Most people on Boxing had GGG winning ?

First fight Nell didn't take it to champ yet won? Ggg don't go distance often so the enthusiasm to Rob him was strong it was now or never. The judges had to take chance while they had chance to. The judges were thinking Ggg stops Nell if they fight again. You'd expect ggg.may get a bad decision one day in his career but not so soon.

8-4? Lol.. I said what I said. Canelo easily won the first three rounds, most of the middle rounds were up for argument, Golovkin basically found his wind for 9/10, and Canelo closed the championship rounds strong. 5 rounds in hand.

The US is corrupt so will make sure Canelo who is a fighter who brings money and fans to the table gets the decision no matter what. Golovkin won a close fight last night but was once again ripped off. People don't talk about the corruption around Canelo for no reason. He lost clearly to Floyd, but had a draw scorecard. He lost to Lara, only landing a few body shots a round, but still got the decision. And he lost the two Golovkin fights as well. He did however beat Cotto and Trout pretty clearly.

There's often the odd scorecard that seems pretty wild. The Mayweather draw, the wide GGG score, the wide card in the Trout and Lara fights. I thought the Cotto scores were a little to wide also. The Mayweather and GGG fights aside though, I did think he was the correct winner.

Money talks, they will have a trilogy as long as the fight is hyped a lot of money involved.

He lost a close majority decision to Mayweather. Of course he didn’t win a round in that fight yet got a draw and a 116-112. He lost clearly to Lara but it was close. A draw wouldn’t have been a disaster but it would have been wrong. Trout he probably didn’t do enough but it was fairly close and he lost twice to GGG but you can make a case he won 5 rounds in both. I felt he beat Cotto clear. 115-113 or 116-112 but not the cards he got.

Pro Canelo crowd and being the A side probably influences a bit. But I think the main reason is in all of his close fights he landed the cleaner more powerful punches. Lara, GGG and Trout all landed more jabs/total punches but Canelo was the one doing more damage and judges usually like that.

Canelo gets all the crowd reactions

It was difficult to score, I had Golovkin winning but his jabs weren't as authoritative as they were in the first fight so I had no issues with the outcome at all. Golovkin didn't mix it up enough and he was pushing a lot with his shots. On top of that Canelo's work to the body seems to have gone unnoticed. In fact I think body punching in general goes unnoticed in this sport. I feel that lack of bodywork did GGG in....AGAIN

Cry all you want, there's extra value placed on clean effective punching, and Canelo's style features clean punching. Alvarez won the first fight 7-5 from what I can remember, and he won this second Golovkin fight a comfortable 8-4, imo. Canelo landed the cleaner more effective work for basically the whole fight, and got most of the credit for it. 8-4? Lol..

Cry all you want, there's extra value placed on clean effective punching, and Canelo's style features clean punching. Alvarez won the first fight 7-5 from what I can remember, and he won this second Golovkin fight a comfortable 8-4, imo. Canelo landed the cleaner more effective work for basically the whole fight, and got most of the credit for it.

Lot of people make a lot of money off Canelo in Vegas. You want fair judging you need to bring in as much money as him. Scoring has very little to do with what happens in the fight.

It was difficult to score, I had Golovkin winning but his jabs weren't as authoritative as they were in the first fight so I had no issues with the outcome at all. Golovkin didn't mix it up enough and he was pushing a lot with his shots. On top of that Canelo's work to the body seems to have gone unnoticed. In fact I think body punching in general goes unnoticed in this sport. I noticed Canelo was slipping short punches inside to the solar plexus I saw like 2 or 3 that would have made me crap my pants

What did you think about last night's fight ? You're one of the more knowledgeable posters on here so I'm curious It was difficult to score, I had Golovkin winning but his jabs weren't as authoritative as they were in the first fight so I had no issues with the outcome at all. Golovkin didn't mix it up enough and he was pushing a lot with his shots. On top of that Canelo's work to the body seems to have gone unnoticed. In fact I think body punching in general goes unnoticed in this sport.

Most fighters who've had long career get robbed at least once if they go to points enough times. Nell last two fights were wonderful opportunities for Nelo to be robbed, *nudge nudge wink wink* although we know they wouldn't have been robberies. Ggg did deserve at least one favourable decision.

I also had Canelo beating Lara. However I definitely had Golovkin winning the first fight and also this one. The Trout fight I didn't watch except for some highlights.

Yep I don't buy into the corruption thing, just far too many different judges. Most of his punches come out fast with lots of snap, he has an eye catching style. I thought both Golovkin fights were either way type fights, GGG probably slightly unfortunate not to get the nod in the first, and the draw in the second There's a lot of things that come into play when you see guys in person. One of those is body language (which Canelo displayed prominently last night). Another is SOUND. Fans that haven't been up close have no idea how much that communicates to the audience/judges. If GG's hard jabs aren't making a sound but Canelo gets an occasional right or a left hook that makes a loud, smacking sound, guess who grabs their attention and wins the round? I'm not big into conspiracies either. It's not that it's impossible, but that it's often the thing a loser falls back onto when they can't explain things logically. Anytime I find myself entertaining conspiracies, I have to ask myself if I'm in denial. (no disrespect to Alex Jones)