Alright, post them up, lets see who knows what. Mine off memory is:
1. GGG
2. Canelo
3. Canelo
4. GGG
5. Even
6. Canelo
7. GGG
8. Canelo
9. GGG
10. GGG
11. GGG
12. GGG
7-4-1, with GGG absolutely mauling Canelo in those championship rounds. Yes some rounds can be said to be close but 10-12 were all GGG, no one with any integrity could have scored them any other way.
GGG dug out greatness in the championship rounds, as champions are supposed.
Lampley actually called the fight last time and that is what he often does. Yes he can be a company shill as well, more so in the last 15 years than before but he is nowhere near as bad as Kellerman or Jones.
The last time Jones was even a barely decent commentator was 10+ years ago.
To each their own I guess. I try to tune them out. Couple of guys I enjoyed were Gil Clancy and Manny Stewart.
0-1 Golovkin. Establishing the jab. Canelo landing some definitive shots but Golovkin's jab accuracy is the story of the rounds
1-1 Canelo. Strong Clean Power punching and bodywork. Golovkin with the Jab, strong right hook.
1-2 Golovkin. Close round some uppercuts from both. Golovkin landed more, landed clearer did more damage and got in some straight rights.
1-3 Golovkin. Golovkin landed more, landed harder, Tore Canelo up with the jab.
2-3 Canelo. At the beginning looked like Golovkin was going to take it, landing harder landing clearer, then canelo started landing near the end of the round and stole the round with 2 strong power shots
3-3 Canelo. Canelo with the harder power shots and ripping Golovkin to the body
4-3 Canelo. Canelo landing the much harder clearer Power shots( I noticed the whore Soul_survivor gave this round to Golovkin. He must be blind. All his credibility to me is gone because Canelo clearly landed the better shots, not even debateable.)
5-3 Canelo. Canelo took over this round, establishing his dominance
6-3 Canelo. Canelo landing with more authority, Golovkin Visibly tired, no mustard in his punches.
6-4 Golovkin. Golovkin with a strong right hand and landed more leather
6-5 Golovkin. Canelo still recovering from the right hand, but fighting through it like a warrior. Golovkin did more damage.
7-5 Canelo. Easily. Golovkin with some strong shots in the first minute, but Canelo undoubtedly closed the show. The last 2 minutes was him lighting Golovkin up.
7-5 Canelo. Canelo fought like a warrior and won a well deserved victory. War Ginger. It almost makes me want to forget he roided.
Best post on the thread
Lampley actually called the fight last time and that is what he often does. Yes he can be a company shill as well, more so in the last 15 years than before but he is nowhere near as bad as Kellerman or Jones.
The last time Jones was even a barely decent commentator was 10+ years ago.
To each their own I guess. I try to tune them out. Couple of guys I enjoyed were Gil Clancy and Manny Stewart.
I scored it 7-4-1 for GGG. After six rounds I had the fight even and after nine rounds I had Golovkin up by a point 5-4. I scored two out of the last three rounds for Golovkin because I believed he buzzed Canelo in the 10th round with an overhand right and staggered him with a left hook in the beginning of round 12.
I scored the 11th round even after GGG got off to a fast start by backing Canelo up for the first time in the fight but Canelo finished the round a lot stronger than Golovkin, Therefore I scored it a draw.
So my unofficial scorecard read a little something like this; 116-113 all in favor for the winner and champion Gennady Golovkin. However, the rounds were very close and hard to score. So I think the judges got it right this time.
Subjectively the fight could have been easily scored the other way around or even a draw.
I scored it 7-4-1 for GGG. After six rounds I had the fight even and after nine rounds I had Golovkin up by a point 5-4. I scored two out of the last three rounds for Golovkin because I believed he buzzed Canelo in the 10th round with an overhand right and staggered him with a left hook in the beginning of round 12.
I scored the 11th round even after GGG got off to a fast start by backing Canelo up for the first time in the fight but Canelo finished the round a lot stronger than Golovkin, Therefore I scored it a draw.
So my unofficial scorecard read a little something like this; 116-113 all in favor for the champion and winner Gennady Golovkin. However, the rounds were very close and hard to score. So I think the judges got it right this time.
Subjectively the fight could have been easily scored the other way around or even a draw.
I scored it 7-4-1 for GGG. After six rounds I had the fight even and after nine rounds I had Golovkin up by a point 5-4. I scored two out of the last three rounds for Golovkin because I believed he buzzed Canelo in the 10th with an overhand right and staggered him with a left hook in the beginning of round 12.
I scored the 11th round even after GGG got off to a fast start by backing Canelo up for the first time in the fight but Canelo finished the round a lot stronger than Golovkin, Therefore I scored it a draw.
So my unofficial scorecard read a little something like this; 116-113 all in favor for the champion and winner Gennady Golovkin. However, the rounds were very close and hard to score. So I think the judges got it right this time.
Subjectively the fight could have been easily scored the other way around or even a draw.
Going to stick up somewhat for Roy. When he first started he was a lot better but hanging out with Kellerman and Lampley must have got to him because now he's regressed.
Lampley actually called the fight last time and that is what he often does. Yes he can be a company shill as well, more so in the last 15 years than before but he is nowhere near as bad as Kellerman or Jones.
The last time Jones was even a barely decent commentator was 10+ years ago.
Jones sounded like he was bought and sold on HBO. The guy couldnt get over how great GGG was in the last 4 rounds and after the fight claims he ran lol
If you claim you have to rewatch a fight you were ringside at, you know your master got a few words for you.
Him and Kellerman are company shills, probably worse than Farhood on Show.
Going to stick up somewhat for Roy. When he first started he was a lot better but hanging out with Kellerman and Lampley must have got to him because now he's regressed.
Alright, post them up, lets see who knows what. Mine off memory is:
1. GGG
2. Canelo
3. Canelo
4. GGG
5. Even
6. Canelo
7. GGG
8. Canelo
9. GGG
10. GGG
11. GGG
12. GGG
7-4-1, with GGG absolutely mauling Canelo in those championship rounds. Yes some rounds can be said to be close but 10-12 were all GGG, no one with any integrity could have scored them any other way.
GGG dug out greatness in the championship rounds, as champions are supposed.
Where can I re watch it?
Yes, just for you, I just re-watched round 8. In my opinion, there was 3 good shots, the early uppercut from Canelo, the overhand right from GGG and the strong jab by Canelo at the end of the round.
There is NO WAY that Canelo 'beat the dog *****' out of GGG. I watched the round on HBO and the commentary said 'Another round that could be scored either way depending on what you are looking for' and it seems you were only looking at Canelo.
GGG has Canelo in the corner, his movement after combinations looked good, more so that Canelo. Canelo has success with one or two punches at a time but both of them are just throwing with little effect. The majority are bouncing off, glancing or missing completely.
Based on what I saw, GGG won the round.
Don't give a shit what HBO said.
Canelo was landing flush shots and body shots for the first 2 mins of the round. The last minute he let off the gas and GGG landed a few jabs and nothing really meaningful.
HBO says that GGG could have won the round because he lands a jab and right hand(Right hand was blocked) at the end but they are way off imo. One of the clearest rounds of the fight that had a lot of close rounds.
The combinations to the head and body Canelo lands between 2:30 and 2:15(Head and body around 10 shots) is the most dominant/clean shots landed in the fight for either guy. He also landed other big body shot and head shot+ jabs but yes he slowed down for the last minute of the round.
GGG didn't do anything close to that in the last minute to steal the round. And a lot of the shots GGG did land in the round are pushing/arm punches, he had no power..He was huffing and puffing most of the round.
I really don't see how you can score that round for GGG, there are plenty other debatable rounds you could pick but this isn't one of them.
Nobody is going to convince someone else who won what round. It was too close for anyone to get anywhere, The last fight proved that. We just got more of the same. I just want everyone put down who trolled someone else saying one fighter would smash the other. Own up to it u you lashed out claiming someone would get beat down. Whats everyone who told someone else that their guy would KO the other saying? How after the first fight did this forum get filled with people claiming utter domination by someone in the next fight? Cause they all got it wrong. No point arguing a close fight, no one gets anywhere. But everyone who filled up threads with feuds saying one guy would crush the other better all be humbled, You all know who you are. Too many promoters on this site, not enough honest people.
My scorecard straight from the scoring app from fight night. Haven't rewatched yet though.
https://preview.ibb.co/hmviHK/20180917_064750.jpg
poems about flowers
Very similar to mine but I cant understand the 12th being a Canelo round. GGG started of way better, faded a little in the middle but came back at the end of the round. The last 3 rounds are all GGG.
My scorecard straight from the scoring app from fight night. Haven't rewatched yet though.
https://preview.ibb.co/hmviHK/20180917_064750.jpg
poems about flowers
I can't be assed to right a full scorecard but I agree with this one - except for 11 and 12, I would have them the other way around but the same outcome.
Anyone that gave GGG the 8th round is retarded, Canelo beat the shit out of Golovkin for most of the round.