EDDIE HEARN ADMITS ANTHONY JOSHUA DID NOT SIGN CONTRACt

These YouTube *****s are corny as ****

Where is Eddie Hearn in the video? All I heard was this clown with his biased opinions. Wilder begged for the fight. He said no to everything Hearn offered him. A beggar suddenly became a chooser. You gotta be an idiot to defend this Klitschko ducker.

Both sides are getting this wrong. Hearn is not offering Whyte because he thinks he can win and to hide AJ. He is doing it because he know Wilder will win, giving him more exposure in the UK and therefore making him somewhat of a known guy, maybe even a killer. So when the fight is made, there is money for everyone to retire into oblivion if they wanted to. He is only promoting a fight to make it become as big as he can.

Good video. Eddie Hearn needs to kick rocks. Are you used to blocking other users whenever you can’t handle their posts? Man up, f@ggot

So what I get from this thread is 1 now Hearn is now Joshua and can sign anything and send it over 2-while Wilder has to accept anything even if no date or venue is included.. 3-No matter what comes out Hearn is right 4-Wilder is no draw yet Hearn keeps chasing him trying to promote him WAKE THE HELL UP AND STOP BEING PROMOTER FANS DAMN!!!!! THEY ARE JUST LIKE LAWYERS...SNAKES WHO WILL DO ANYTHING TO MAKE MONEY OFF OF ANYONE ELSE!!!!!!! Can you tell me in what legal way.. or what obligation necessitates Anthony joshuas signature to be on the agreement that wilder shares with the promoter of the event and provider of his purse guarantee. Joshua is not a promoter.. he is not paying wilder nor is he overseeing the event. Wilders guaranteed purse would be paid by matchroom and they and only they would be putting it in escrow and providing evidence as such. Please provide a legal or contractual precedent that means both AJ and wilder sign the same contract... When both would have wildly different agreements with the promoter ( matchroom ) Im really interested to hear exactly why wilder requires AJ's signature on his contract when AJ isn't party to the agreement within which wilder would be required to sign.

So what I get from this thread is 1 now Hearn is now Joshua and can sign anything and send it over 2-while Wilder has to accept anything even if no date or venue is included.. 3-No matter what comes out Hearn is right 4-Wilder is no draw yet Hearn keeps chasing him trying to promote him WAKE THE HELL UP AND STOP BEING PROMOTER FANS DAMN!!!!! THEY ARE JUST LIKE LAWYERS...SNAKES WHO WILL DO ANYTHING TO MAKE MONEY OFF OF ANYONE ELSE!!!!!!!

https://media.giphy.com/media/RKe73XLbBCKOI/giphy.gif

No he doesn't ... Matchrooms contract with wilder for that bout would be signed by Eddie Hearn as Hearn would promoting the event and Joshua. Wilder and Joshua at no point would sign the same piece of paper. The agreement for that fight would feature hearns signature as Joshua's promoter and Wilders. If Finkel and wilder had an issue ..hearns signature would be just as enforceable as Joshua's. Pigeons has worked in the industry doing this exact thing and even he will state that hearns signature is just the same as Joshua's on that contract. That's why I was scratching my head when I read that Hearn had sent Wilder a contract with AJ's signature on it. Like .. why the heck would AJ sign Wilder's contract?

This is another bait and switch move by Hearn, just like when he sent Deontay a contract that didn't have a date on it! He's trying to trick him into signing a contract to fight Dillian Whyte by pretending its for a fight with AJ! SMDH, that guy is a fckn snake!

Eh Hearn isn’t even speaking in this video It’s some random wilder fan boy More fake news from team wilder https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/nickfanon/images/9/9a/Triggered.gif/revision/latest?cb=20160309233441

Then why was Hearn saying he was going to send a finished signed contract with AJ's signature on it to entice wilder? his words exactly. obviously he didn't anyway. but why say it it's not necessary for him to sign it? why are the other team wondering where the signature is that was meant to be on it? - if it wasn't standard practice, they wouldn't be wondering ... Again.. you're taking everything literally when in business and legalities ( y'know what you think you were talking about ) AJ's signature on the bout contract to wilder means nothing because Joshua isn't paying and he isn't promoting the event. His contract varies wildly from Wilders... So what sort of contract do you think exists that needs both signaturess and what does it contain? Please tell me this .. They aren't wondering why his signature isn't on the contract.. because they know AJ doesn't sign one with Wilders signature on it!! And he wouldnt have done if they'd sent the contract back when they were originally provided the UNSIGNED copy. They're taking words.. and making sensationalist news out of their literal meaning when the business and legalities are far different. Two contracts.. one for each fighter.. neither contain both signatures. Those are the facts. By the way.. finkels signed more contracts than I've had hot dinners and I bet none of them have had both fighters actual inked signatures in them. Maybe a copy of a signature page from that fighters own contract to accompany their own.. But not ever both on one contract.

Yet another stupid thread. What's the point of signing when the B-side is greedy as f$ck?

No.. you seem to be under the impression that wilder and AJ need to sign the same contract.. they absolutely don't. None of AJ's opponents have signed a contract with his signature on it. Because his signature is on the contract he holds with matchroom. The opponents signature is on the contract THEY hold with matchroom...because their purse...comes from matchroom. Do you think there's some sort of bout agreement whereby both fighters sign their names to each others? Because that absolutely isn't the case !! The contracts are between fighter and event promoter .. nobody else lol. Go and speak to onepunch.. he's overseen these contracts in THIS sport and industry and he'll say exactly the same Then why was Hearn saying he was going to send a finished signed contract with AJ's signature on it to entice wilder? his words exactly. obviously he didn't anyway. but why say it it's not necessary for him to sign it? why are the other team wondering where the signature is that was meant to be on it? - if it wasn't standard practice, they wouldn't be wondering ...

Good lord you are stupid. I can't even be bothered anym.... No.. you seem to be under the impression that wilder and AJ need to sign the same contract.. they absolutely don't. None of AJ's opponents have signed a contract with his signature on it. Because his signature is on the contract he holds with matchroom. The opponents signature is on the contract THEY hold with matchroom...because their purse...comes from matchroom. Do you think there's some sort of bout agreement whereby both fighters sign their names to each others? Because that absolutely isn't the case !! The contracts are between fighter and event promoter .. nobody else lol. Go and speak to onepunch.. he's overseen these contracts in THIS sport and industry and he'll say exactly the same

Wilders contract is not with AJ.. it's with the promoter of the event. Hearn is the promoter of the event. Wilder has a contract signed by Hearn on behalf of matchroom outlining the terms agreed for that fight. It isn't AJ paying him . It's matchroom!! Hearn has a contract signed by AJ and himself outlining their terms for that event . At what point does wilder have any financial dealings with AJ In the contract for April? Anthony joshuas contract is for 80% of all revenue. The full revenue generated after the event before any splits is in the hands of matchroom who take their twenty percent and provide AJ with his 80. Wilders guarantee would be held in escrow.. provided by matchroom with proof of such provided before the event. Wilder never sees AJ's signature.. because A. He doesn't need to and B. Because he receives no financial amount from AJ directly . I don't know what else to say to explain this to you. Good lord you are stupid. I've explained legally why a fighters name needs to be on a contract. I can't even be bothered anym....

But you're missing the point. You can enter a business deal with someone to give them rights to operate something for you for x amount of years, it doesn't mean they own your business. It's just a contract for a service but you can't break it because it's legally binding. But you don't belong to them. A boxer isn't an employee, they operate as their own entity in terms of a legal business structure and they have contracts with promotors and managers (other companies) that provide a service for them. If you want to fight AJ, you need his signature on the contract because legally he is operating as a business or self employed. It's that simple. Go watch an interview with Hearn about the business model of the PPV shows, he says "the fighter owns the show". those exact words. Hearn just organises & runs it on behalf of them, legally. It doesn't matter how it looks from the outside, the legal side of it is vastly different. Wilders contract is not with AJ.. it's with the promoter of the event. Hearn is the promoter of the event. Wilder has a contract signed by Hearn on behalf of matchroom outlining the terms agreed for that fight. It isn't AJ paying him . It's matchroom!! Hearn has a contract signed by AJ and himself outlining their terms for that event . At what point does wilder have any financial dealings with AJ In the contract for April? Anthony joshuas contract is for 80% of all revenue. The full revenue generated after the event before any splits is in the hands of matchroom who take their twenty percent and provide AJ with his 80. Wilders guarantee would be held in escrow.. provided by matchroom with proof of such provided before the event. Wilder never sees AJ's signature.. because A. He doesn't need to and B. Because he receives no financial amount from AJ directly . I don't know what else to say to explain this to you.

Hearn owns all promotional rights of Anthony joshua for the next three years. Hearn stated today when it was brought up by thaboxongvoice that Hearn says for AJ and always has done. If there was a problem with that.. I'm sure it would have been brought up by somebody by now. Very simple.. 1 contract between Joshua and matchroom outlining their terms for the event. 1 contract between matchroom and wilder outlining their terms for the event. There isn't a contract sent to wilder with Joshua's name on it. Wilders agreement is with the promoter.. matchroom. Not AJ But you're missing the point. You can enter a business deal with someone to give them rights to operate something for you for x amount of years, it doesn't mean they own your business. It's just a contract for a service but you can't break it because it's legally binding. But you don't belong to them. A boxer isn't an employee, they operate as their own entity in terms of a legal business structure and they have contracts with promotors and managers (other companies) that provide a service for them. If you want to fight AJ, you need his signature on the contract because legally he is operating as a business or self employed. It's that simple. Go watch an interview with Hearn about the business model of the PPV shows, he says "the fighter owns the show". those exact words. Hearn just organises & runs it on behalf of them, legally. It doesn't matter how it looks from the outside, the legal side of it is vastly different.

When 3 people say the same thing and have a functional understanding of the English language, I tend to take what they say literally. When a person like Shelly Finkel disputes that claim, I tend to trust their insight over that of people on a boxing forum filled with trolls. Even when it contradicts what an actual party agreement is. At what point is Wilders agreement with Joshua? Wilders contract is with the promoter of the event.. matchroom. So he gets hearns signature. He gets that because the contract between AJ and matchroom has been signed by AJ. At no point is there a contract that is physically signed by both wilder and AJ. As I stated.. you're taking everything too literal when as I've mentioned.. hearns signature is the one necessary for wilder and the event promoters contract to be binding.

So you are referring to the April date? Yes.. that date would be handled if all agreed by matchroom. Hearn owns all promotional rights over Anthony joshua.. he signs for Anthony joshua when it comes to agreements with other parties . Obviously Anthony joshua signs his own contract with matchroom.. that doesn't go to Finkel or wilder.