http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5983251/Swimmer-Ryan-Lochte-suspended-July-2019-use-IV.html
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/07/23/18/4E84D17300000578-5983251-image-a-16_1532367006105.jpg
Lochte posted this pic on IG in May. this got him under investigation. it's now deleted.
The IV on contained vitamins (legal) but exceeded 100 milliliters (illegal).
"Lochte received an intravenous infusion of permitted substances at an infusion clinic," the USADA announcement of the suspension said. Under most circumstances, athletes cannot receive IVs unless related to a hospitalization or when allowed under the terms of a USADA-approved exemption.
Mayweather applied for a TUE on May 19th for a fight that took place May 2nd. It was approved May 20th, the following day. That smells rotten. And his IV exceeded 700 milliliters.
Then you go on USADA's website and read a TUE must be applied for "in advance."
https://i.imgur.com/Ov7C90Y.pnghttps://www.usada.org/iv-infusions-explanatory-note/
Floyd was in violation of everything they claim to be against and got off. his IV was a home visit non-emergency situation with a liquid amount twice as much as Ryan's and he failed to apply for an exemption in advance.
I smell :bsflag:
he should have got a tue to cheat. floyd needed it cause he was drained from dropping 2 pounds. anyone who criticizes that is a horrible person. you dont care about floyds health? i dont care if you consider it cheating the mans alive today thanks to that IV.
No kidding, wow, look at that. That's some valuable research we haven't all seen about 92 times by now. Thanks
You're welcome. Glad to be of assistance.
Why do I bother conversing with those who lack any knowledge about topics they feel they have to contribute loudly to?
Read the WADA IV rules here
I'll quote the relevant bits just in case you're still struggling...
Assuming you've read and understood the above at this point, please point out exactly where a rule has been broken.
No kidding, wow, look at that. That's some valuable research we haven't all seen about 92 times by now. Thanks
Because 750<50, got it, thanks for playing
Why do I bother conversing with those who lack any knowledge about topics they feel they have to contribute loudly to?
Read the WADA IV rules here
I'll quote the relevant bits just in case you're still struggling...
An IV infusion or injection is the supply of fluid and/or prescribed medication by means of a syringe or “butterfly” needle, directly into a vein.
Infusions or injections of 50 mL or less per a 6-hour period are permitted unless the infused/injected substance is on the Prohibited List.
Infusions or injections of more than 50 mL per a 6-hour period are prohibitedunless the infused/injected substance is administered during a hospital admission, surgical procedure or clinical investigation. Please consult the tables figures in the Appendix for more details on the principles and examples of when IV infusion/injections of certain substances are permitted or prohibited.
If a non-prohibited substance is infused or injected without a concurrent hospital admission, surgical procedure or clinical investigation, a TUE must be submitted for this Prohibited Method if more than 50 mL of fluid per a 6-hour period is infused or injected.
If a Prohibited Substance is administered via IV infusion or injection a TUE application must be submitted for the Prohibited Substance regardless of whether the infusion is less than 50 mL or the setting/circumstances under which it is administered. In situations of medical emergency or clinical time constraints, a retroactive TUE application is acceptable (ISTUE article 4.3)
Assuming you've read and understood the above at this point, please point out exactly where a rule has been broken.
I don't believe that being allowed a massive infusion of saline and vitamins before giving a urine sample is business as usual.
You keep saying "massive" infusion. It was 25 ounces of salt water. Hardly a massive amount for a 150 pound man. He gave a urine sample before the IV. He gave a sample after. Further, IV is most effective for diluting blood samples, not urine samples, and you'd take a lot more than 25 ounces to dilute your blood.
Most importantly, everything was done with USADA supervision and USADA determined everything was done for legitimate medical reasons. There is no evidence to the contrary.
There's nothing crooked about it. TUEs are granted all the time. There's no evidence anything was crooked.
Hauser's article is the only reason anybody thinks there was controversy and that's only because his article was so misleading and designed to manipulate fans who don't know how these things normally work.
The paperwork for a retroactive TUE being submitted a couple weeks after the treatment is nothing out of the ordinary. USADA was notified a TUE was being requested and the paperwork was received in the allowable time. The TUE committee approved the TUE without knowing who the athlete was, as they do with all TUEs.
So to suggest Floyd was given special treatment is to suggest the entire system is a ruse and if the entire system is a ruse, he would have never even needed a TUE to begin with.
I don't believe that being allowed a massive infusion of saline and vitamins before giving a urine sample is business as usual. Maybe it is but if it is then I do not see how that system could ever detect a fighter who is blood doping unless that fighter wasn't aware of his right to dilute his system.
-sorry but it looks extremely crooked to me.
There's nothing crooked about it. TUEs are granted all the time. There's no evidence anything was crooked.
Hauser's article is the only reason anybody thinks there was controversy and that's only because his article was so misleading and designed to manipulate fans who don't know how these things normally work.
The paperwork for a retroactive TUE being submitted a couple weeks after the treatment is nothing out of the ordinary. USADA was notified a TUE was being requested and the paperwork was received in the allowable time. The TUE committee approved the TUE without knowing who the athlete was, as they do with all TUEs.
So to suggest Floyd was given special treatment is to suggest the entire system is a ruse and if the entire system is a ruse, he would have never even needed a TUE to begin with.
Correct. But also means NAC TUE wasn't needed. USADA TUE is what was needed, which Floyd received. So there's no issue. The "controversy" is invented.
https://media.giphy.com/media/joV1k1sNOT5xC/giphy.gif
-sorry but it looks extremely crooked to me.
So for the purposes of IV's, the WADA rules and regulation trump all, this by contractual obligation. It isn't even relevant to the conversation what the NSAC allowed or did not allow.
Correct. But also means NAC TUE wasn't needed. USADA TUE is what was needed, which Floyd received. So there's no issue. The "controversy" is invented.
So for the purposes of IV's, the WADA rules and regulation trump all, this by contractual obligation. It isn't even relevant to the conversation what the NSAC allowed or did not allow.
And he complied with those WADA rules, so...
if this swimmer guy brought 100 million into vegas twice a year usada and the nsac would be liking his post instead of suspending the guy.
Money talks boys.
yeah floyd fell ill that's why he was all smiling and laughing. :lol1:
:) ...........................
Yeah floyd fell ill that's why he was all smiling and laughing. :lol1:
There was never anything said about fluid falling ill, he himself said it was simply that his urine was darker than usual and lots of fighters use IV to rehydrate, he's a cheat, pure and simple
Of course, but WADA doesn't set NAC policy. The Nevada Athletic Commission has their own rules and their rules allowed IV. Floyd & Pac chose to hire USADA to enforce stricter rules, requiring USADA to confirm that an IV was for a legitimate medical reason.
So for the purposes of IV's, the WADA rules and regulation trump all, this by contractual obligation. It isn't even relevant to the conversation what the NSAC allowed or did not allow.
Right, kill the messenger, not the message .
HBO hired Hauser to stop writing hit pieces about them and write hit pieces about their enemies instead. Hauser's hit piece about Mayweather contained numerous inaccuracies, spelled out in great detail by USADA's rebuttal. Hauser's hit piece painted a wildly inaccurate picture of the situation.
Dude, Floyd has USADA in his pocket .
The same USADA who let him take hours to give a piss sample . And the piss was all brown from masking agent .
What do you consider the most credible evidence that Mayweather's "piss was all brown from masking agent?"