Let's settle this with votes: Was Castillo robbed vs Mayweather?

Only floyd cheerleaders seen it the other way. Lol

I feel it was a draw, maybe slight edge to Castillo, but could have reasonably been scored either way. I think the scorecards are what caused the backlash on Floyd, the scorecards really weren't very good and that caused an overreaction to the result. If you had had all the scores between 114-112 in either direction I don't think there would have been as much controversy. The wide scores made it look like a fix or biased scoring.

I watched this again yesterday and still cant see how Mayweather ever win that fight. Should of been called a draw or a Castillo win.

Very close. I give it to Mayweather. Never liked the post-fight analysis by Larry and Lampley, they made it sound like Mayweather was battered from pillar to post, and people just parrot them, but watching the fight...it's obvious Mayweather edged it.

3 judges, 3 lopsided Mayweather cards, that’s crooked as hell. Isn’t stacking the deck robbery?

Castillo in all honesty deserved for the fight to be declared a draw They could of gave him that much

That is your way of scoring a fight and not mine. I give the round to the boxer who lands more and better punches. I don't score rounds for the boxer who made him miss unless he made him pay with more punches. In other words landed punches count for you but missed punches don't count against you. If they did then Clottey beat Pacquiao without throwing many punches because he blocked and slipped so many punches. Never mind that Pacquiao threw and landed many more punches. If missing punches really cost you points high volume punchers would be afraid to let their hands go for fear of missing punches and losing points. Boxing is scored by punches landed not punches blocked or slipped. Making punches miss is it's own reward because you didn't get hit. Mayweather did get hit a lot by Castillo. If you are kidding or being sarcastic that's different. Great fughin point Blows my mind the way people judge a fight And the fact is , if a fighter is so slick that he makes his opponent miss , but doesn’t make him pay , then what’s the fughin point Might as well get hit

You wanna say controversial then say that. You use robbery, that's revisionism. When folks discuss SRL/Hagler, most know it was close. When folks discuss Whitaker/Chavez, most know it was an awful card. But, most folks avoid the word robbery in those old fights and rightly so. And objective folks mention everything, not just the things that further the point they want to make. https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/pilotonline.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/0/1a/01a890c2-0b83-5178-b6f6-ab4bbe8b982a/563d645c43b6d.image.jpg Whitaker vs Chavez took place September 10, 1993. as soon as the cards were read it was called a robbery and still is til this day.

a close fight is not a robbery. i thought castillo won but it was close! they also fought a rematch, and we know what happened.

Castillo deserves the win against Floyd on their first fight. If you re-watch it on youtube, in my honest opinion Castillo clearly won the fight.

I scored the fight 114-112 for Mayweather. I thought Mayweather swept the first 5 rounds and I also felt that he won both rounds where points were deducted. Castillo didn't do anything in the the 8th round until the last 30 seconds or so. I scored that round 10-8 for Mayweather. If I had scored the 10th round for Castillo, my card would have been 113-113. I can't believe there isn't a decent video of this fight online. The two on Youtube look like ass.

Since when is a close fight a robbery?

I had Castillio winning but it was close no biggie

No one will ever convince me the rematch was the whitewash people like to pretend it is either.

No one will ever convince me Mayweather won this fight.

I don't really like calling it "razor close"...but Castillo won a close fight.

Close either way fight. Scored it for Mayweather.

I can get with Castillo won close, but not Castillo clearly won. It was real close

It was a close fight that could've gone either way. Only retards would call those robberies. I scored it for Floyd, but have no issue with anyone scoring it for Castillo. That's why we had the rematch.

These forums are full of Floyd haters, this poll makes no sense because the outcome can already be predicted.