Prime Pacquiao vs Crawford or Spence. Who wins?

The 2009 version of Pac was on another level, in terms of speed, power and stamina. I would probably favor him to beat both (assuming the current versions) but it's a tough call.

Prime Juiced Pac was a beast while a prime juced floyd is a coward. :lol1:

Prime Juiced Pac was a beast

:bottle::bottle::bottle: overrated? Lol ok I said overstated, not overrated. People act like he was a knockout machine but he really wasn't. I'm not a fanboy like you, don't get us mixed up, I call it how I see it, check my post history if you don't believe me.

Pacquiao rise is overstated. He never really fought anybody at 147 until clottey. He fought Cotto/DLH and etc at 145. I don't care, but people act like he was whooping on Prime welterweights in his rise. :bottle::bottle::bottle: overrated? Lol ok

is that why he was accused of being on peds?? "i moved up in weight too but i wasnt just walking thru everybody" :rofl: Pacquiao rise is overstated. He never really fought anybody at 147 until clottey. He fought Cotto/DLH and etc at 145. I don't care, but people act like he was whooping on Prime welterweights in his rise.

cant even make this shiiet up! lol. so you acknowledge that i do know what i am talking about then? that's mighty nice of you sir. lol Which one of those posts said you don't know sh*t about boxing? :lol1: But no I'm definitely not acknowledging that :lol1: But I didn't say it.

you posted that only after getting called out for being a fool! Haha. You can’t be serious. You are delusional.

of course my parents know that im on the computer! they're living in the house that i bought! have you check up on your parents lately?? :rofl: im surprise you didnt deny it this time that you've been going back and forth with me for hours with a guy who supposedly doesnt know shiiet about boxing (your words) :rofl: I never said you don't know sh*t about boxing :lol1: I go back and forth with all kinds of people. This is a dicussion board mate that's what happens on these things.

yes, "literally" nobody :rofl: Do you know what literally means?

you said he wouldnt beat spence and crawford in his prime! even tho spence and crawford has yet to be tested! then you make claims like pac ducked raheem as if raheem was some ATG :rofl: I made no claim Raheem was anything like that. I clearly posted he was high risk, low reward and that his attributes were problematic for manny.

your time is coming. remember what you said, the bolded. remember that! :rofl: its gonna be a massacre i tell ya. i was well aware that he fought and beat only morales, i checked his record, why do you think im making comments like he "literally" fought nobody? :smashfrea :rofl: I don't know that's why I asked you. Because if he literally fought nobody then that includes Morales.

yall see the BS on here?? dunn and iron disrespecting pac's prime like he was nothing yet they're hyping up fcvking raheem and ali funeka who the fook? :rofl: Wtf? I’m not doing any of that except pointing out he ducked Raheem and disputing your claim Raheem was unknown.

yes, it says a lot about me, so much that you've been going back and forth with me for hours. are you gonna deny this too? :rofl: That's usually what happens on discussion boards mate :lol1: Do your parents know that you go on the computer?

yall see the BS on here?? dunn and iron disrespecting pac's prime like he was nothing yet they're hyping up fcvking raheem and ali funeka who the fook? :rofl: Never disrepected Pacquaio. Never said he ducked Raheem either. Never hyped up Raheem or Funeka either. All I disputed was your claim that Raheem fought literally nobody when he just beat Morales who'd just Pacquaio. But I get the sense that you weren't aware that Raheem beat Morales.

ducking raheem :lol1: all them great fighters but hes ducking some nobody. i dont care what he did against morales, morales is a far better fighter than him. and if u actually knew boxing (which u dont) youd realise morales went up in weight against raheem and he was never ever the same after the first pacquiao fight. how can u duck someone who wasnt in your weight class. by the time pacquiao got up there to that weight raheem had 2 more losses. No not really Raheem would have been the more logical fight to make at that point. Morales was more money so I don't blame him but don't act like a lot of people would have preferred Raheem at that point after he beat Morales.

yes, i've never heard of him. sorry to burst your bubble. :thinking: Well that says more about you doesn't it :lol1:

if you take a test with 31 questions and you got 30 wrong and only 1 right, guess what buddy? you failed! just like on here. lol. Yeah but if you said that person scored 0 on the test then would be a lie because he scored 1. Literally nobody would be 0. Which part don't you get?

half decent? lol. so we giving fighters major props for being half decent now? lol. you know he ended up getting taken out by the school teacher jeff horn right? lol No. Just saying he was decent. You said you'd never heard of him but I'd imagine most people have heard of him on here or atleast they should do.

Funeka was half decent. You never heard of him? You need to find a new sport man :lol1: He doesn't watch the sport outside of Manny so there is no way he'd know Funeka, rocky Juarez or any other solid guy Raheem fought.