I personally think Golovkin's legacy is secure but I don't believe its anything too special. A win over Canelo will help it but in all honesty I don't see it as a career maker. He's had 20+ title defenses with MAYBE 6-8 credible opponents. You can't fight the best every time and mandatories do stall things but if I has to grade GGG's legacy from a 0-10 I'd give it a 7-7.5 right now. I'll bump it to an 8 with a decision Canelo win or maybe a bit over 8 if he stops Canelo. Idk what do you guys think about his legacy?
so you dont think it matters that theres only one planet earth which can have only one corresponding world belt?
yeh that figures.
Okay, you are a retard.
Done.
You lost.
The shape of the earth, neither how many there are matters regarding how many belts there are.
How many defenses does GGG have?
so you dont think it matters that theres only one planet earth which can have only one corresponding world belt?
yeh that figures.
i did say that the earth WASNT ever flat. That one earth that is, theres not a second earth thats flat and oneround.
The shape of the earth, neither how many there are matters regarding how many belts there are.
How many defenses does GGG have?
But there are two belts that are both valid as championships.
So how many title defenses does GGG have?
i did say that the earth WASNT ever flat. That one earth that is, theres not a second earth thats flat and oneround.
sure.
but the earth wasnt flat ever, if thats where you are heading with this.
But there are two belts that are both valid as championships.
So how many title defenses does GGG have?
thats all thats needed. Even they dont think its valid.
The people you are defending think you are wrong. good luck with that defence.
see ya.
They still think it is valid at this current time.
They have promised to scrap it, .
thats all thats needed. Even they dont think its valid.
The people you are defending think you are wrong. good luck with that defence.
see ya.
shame that dont include the WBA who have promised to scrap it.
u are on a real winner here when the org you are defending says you are wrong. but keep going by all means.
They have promised to scrap it, but that doesn't mean it is invalid as we speak.
If US were to make owning a gun illegal tomorrow, it doesn't mean it would be illegal owning a gun in the US today.
You still haven't caught on to the fact that all boxing organisations think that the WBA regular counts as a title defense, have you?
shame that dont include the WBA who have promised to scrap it.
u are on a real winner here when the org you are defending says you are wrong. but keep going by all means.