Comments Thread For: Frank Warren on Hooker-Flanagan Scores, Tyson Fury, Murray

Here fishy fishy fishy fishy.

Pi55 off Frank you boggle eyed ****..nobody cares about you.. your raggedy **** broke as **** promotion or your bullsh1tter excuses for a piss poor card and ripping off boxnation subscribers. Bellend Quote of the day ....p1ss off frank you boggle eyed c_nt lol

He said that it was a close fight, and it could have gone either way depending on what you prefer, but then he complains about the wide scores? Surely if it's a close fight but you prefer one fighter you will score heavily in that fighters favour? a close fight could be 118-112 either way using that logic. This judging thing is found all the time. I had hughie beating Parker 7-5, and I gave all the even round to Parker, and Hughie threw the cleaner punches and made Parker miss in 7 of the rounds.... but I also understand that that style doesn't wash with others, and they scored Parker purely on being front-foot... it's subjective. I scored this fight 8-4 to Hooker, he was the dominant fighter and controlled Flanagan, but I can also see the argument Flanagan was the aggressor and tried to put it on Hooker in a lot of rounds.

Pi55 off Frank you boggle eyed ****..nobody cares about you.. your raggedy **** broke as **** promotion or your bullsh1tter excuses for a piss poor card and ripping off boxnation subscribers. Bellend

Boxingscene needs to add a like and dislike option for some of these articles. Warren writes whiny propaganda posts like this all the time, as if the viewers don’t have eyes of their own. This was in no way a “very good card,” it was hardly a good one.

What about the 117-111 for Flanagan score? That was worse

Warren is a snake who poison fat Fury.