Why is the WBC wrong for enforcing a mandatory on GGG?

damn, I didn’t know that Vanes was still ranked so high by the WBC. Vanes had a decent ranking with the WBC and over time most of the fighters in front of him lost or left to fight for other organizations. So by being inactive, Vanes eventually had risen to the point where he was one of the highest ranked fighters willing to fight an eliminator. After the eliminator was set, purse bid conducted, etc, his opponent dropped out. Often in those situations, the fighter who agreed to the purse bid and didn't drop out will jump to the top of the rankings to replace the fighter who refused to honor the purse bid.

Vanes was ranked #1 at 154 in the WBC, so refuse to approve him for a voluntary defense at 160 would have been tough to justify. Vanes wasn't ranked by the IBF in any division, which made it tougher for them to approve him as an opponent. damn, I didn’t know that Vanes was still ranked so high by the WBC.

I've seen two of his fights and don't think he beats GGG. but that's not the point. point is he got ducked and now lil g is getting stripped. I suggest you look him up and scope out his amateur career as well. And how in your mind did GGG duck him when he had a fight with Canelo scheduled? It wasn't his fault that fight fell through. And while I think GGG beats him as well, to risk a fighter like that when you had been training for a totally different guy like Canelo would have been stupid. Now that that's out of the way.....what's with the lil g thing?

Is that an admission that you don't really know much about his mandatory? I've seen two of his fights and don't think he beats GGG. but that's not the point. point is he got ducked and now lil g is getting stripped.

The guy has 12 fights. he's green and should be easy work for GGG. so it's ok for Vanes to face golovkin on 2 weeks notice but lil g can't prepare for Derev? oh well. the Vanes fight was a massive waste because now the IBF is breathing fire down his neck. Is that an admission that you don't really know much about his mandatory?

There seemed to be no problem when they did it with Canelo for GGG..All the other mando's GGG had to fight were fine with his fans..So why is Charlo an issue? yo gary where's that link that wilder has 50 mil

Jacobs and Alvarez had no problems going the distance... They both ran

To face a guy like Derevyanchenko on 3 weeks preparation for very short money would have been stupid on GGG's part. Blame Canelo, not GGG. The guy has 12 fights. he's green and should be easy work for GGG. so it's ok for Vanes to face golovkin on 2 weeks notice but lil g can't prepare for Derev? oh well. the Vanes fight was a massive waste because now the IBF is breathing fire down his neck.

I don't have a problem with Golovkin fighting Charlo next. In fact, I'd love to see it. It'd be interesting to see what GGG's critics would say on the outcome. If he fights Charlo and loses, of course, the haters would say that they knew he was a hype job all along. But if Golovkin should win, I wonder if they'll say that Jarmall is a hype job or wasn't ready because he hasn't fought for very long @ MW. Or, would they finally give Golovkin some props?

GGG has pressure from all side. but thats his own doing. nobody told him to waste his time with a worthless Vanes fight. he could've gotten the IBF mando out the way but chose to play stupid. To face a guy like Derevyanchenko on 3 weeks preparation for very short money would have been stupid on GGG's part. Blame Canelo, not GGG.

...typical TripleCUCKs defend their glazed cock no matter what. Perhaps this trash shouldn't have fought a homeless person on a 2 week camp after 2 year layoff and a career in JMW coming off a loss. "End thread." You’re right, he should’ve pulled out of his scheduled fight; then get suspended for ped abuse. Calling people cucks when your profile name extols a drug cheat who waited 2 years for ggg to get older just shows you’re a massive canelo ****sucker.

There seemed to be no problem when they did it with Canelo for GGG..All the other mando's GGG had to fight were fine with his fans..So why is Charlo an issue? Because they are using it to strong arm GGG into fighting Canelo on his terms when he was the reason that the fight got delayed. Let's not forget that Charlo was n/a at the time the May fight happened, therefore missing a title shot opportunity.

Stevenson hasn’t fought a mandatory in something like 5 years and he still holds his wbc belt. It’s acceptable that they enforce a mandatory defense but the manner in which they’re going about it is so blatantly biased.

Well, had they not sanctioned it like the IBF, they’d appear less hypocritical IMO. Vanes was ranked #1 at 154 in the WBC, so refuse to approve him for a voluntary defense at 160 would have been tough to justify. Vanes wasn't ranked by the IBF in any division, which made it tougher for them to approve him as an opponent.

As I understand it, there's no real problem. If not Canelo then unification with Saunders. If neither is available or willing then Charlo is as good as any.

GGG has pressure from all side. but thats his own doing. nobody told him to waste his time with a worthless Vanes fight. he could've gotten the IBF mando out the way but chose to play stupid.

There seemed to be no problem when they did it with Canelo for GGG..All the other mando's GGG had to fight were fine with his fans..So why is Charlo an issue? Considering that GGG was Sergio Martinez's mandatory, and he chose to fight Cotto instead. Given that GGG was Cotto's mandatory, and he chose to fight Canelo instead. Given that GGG was Canelo's mandatory, and he chose to vacate the belt instead. The WBC never enforced Canelo's mandatory obligations. I don't think anyone has a problem with him fighting Charlo. That would be a good fight.

They weren't opposed to the Vanes fight. Got them a sanctioning fee on short notice instead of there being no fight at all and therefore no fee. When you say they were quiet, what exactly was the WBC supposed to say? Well, had they not sanctioned it like the IBF, they’d appear less hypocritical IMO.

Because they're a Mexican organization and play favorites to Mexicans.

Thanks for the info, why was the WBC quiet about the vanes match until after the fact though? They weren't opposed to the Vanes fight. Got them a sanctioning fee on short notice instead of there being no fight at all and therefore no fee. When you say they were quiet, what exactly was the WBC supposed to say?