he was one half of the fight. ive never been racist, i fancied a name change and ive done it.
Smith wasn't the target of your negative post now was he?
Never been racist? Your history here tells a totally different story.
Tell the truth, you changed your moniker because most of the regular posters here give you no credit because of your racist posts.
So Paul Smith is black now is he?
Smith wasn't one of the fighters you were making a negative post about now was he?
You can change your moniker but you're still the same ole racist dummyshow
One of the highest ranked heavyweight fighters against a guy who had been down many times, and whose best win in recent years was Ondrej Pala.
Price was struggling with a below-journeyman.
"Hence, a $2500 bet on Alex would yield $100 while a $100 wager on Price would yield $1,200. "
It was a fun fight while it lasted
Floyd v Berto is a pretty bad one really. I know it was his retirement and wouldn't expect the hardest of fights but still, Berto. Can't really knock the McGregor fight. It was what it was. I never took it seriously as a boxing match. It was just an event.
Wilder v Arreola was quite bad, which reminds me, Arreola must be due his token WBC title shot any day now. He randomly gets one every couple of years despite sat on the sofa smoking weed and not active. He must have some dirt on Mauricio Sulaiman.
That was a brillant fight how was it bad match:boxing:
One of the highest ranked heavyweight fighters against a guy who had been down many times, and whose best win in recent years was Ondrej Pala.
Price was struggling with a below-journeyman.
"Hence, a $2500 bet on Alex would yield $100 while a $100 wager on Price would yield $1,200. "
Charlo v centeno, charlo v heiland, tank v cuellar, ward v brand, ward v paul smith
And what do all of those fighters have in common? You can change your moniker but it's still the same ole racist dummyshow
Ward vs Paul Smith
Ward vs Brand
Charlo vs injured cripple
Floyd vs McGregor
Canelo vs Khan
Wilder vs 90% of his resume
And your racist agenda shines through again.
To me, a bad matchup is one where the difference between fighters is more than 30 or 40 spots in the same weight class. If the fighters are in different weight classes, you need to 'equalize' them. How good of an opponent is fighter X in the weight category in which they fought? Khan-Lo Greco was a bad matchup. Khan is still a legit top5-10 WW, while LoGreco was MAYBE top50.
Salka was something like 30th ranked fighter at 135 when Garcia brought him up to 140. That was a sham.
Brand was the 40th ranked SMW when Ward brought him up to LHW. That was horrible.
Some of Ramirez' recent opposition falls into this category. Bursak was a meh MW until a few years ago, probably barely makes top50 SMW, and that's who Ramirez fights. Same with Ahmed. Dude had no business to be in the ring with top3 SMW.
Vast majority of fights people mention don't qualify for a bad matchup and are a product of agendas on one or another side.