Joshua vs Klitschko - Return To Wembley May 9th BBC1 - 10:45pm - Oh no just no.

That documentary last night was so goofy. I bet the casuals loved it.

Not only is your opinion completely worthless, Your grammar and capabilities to write a coherent sentence is also a load of sh*t. as as been said you opinion that my opinion is worthless is worthless, as is your opinion of my granma.

The BBC ****ing LOVE Joshua. He fits their progressive, liberal demographic so well. Wait for the long montages of AJ being humble and 'doing it for his community ' etc.

I still blame Tyson Fury for allowing that fraud to get his hands on those belts!

he wasnt, he was fairly good at a narrow skillset, but helpess outside that narrow set not what you'd call a very good fighter. no very good fighter is easily killed by noones repeatedly but he gets 11/10 for trying hard. the fact that you dont acknowledge that suggests me your opinion is worthless on this subject. Not only is your opinion completely worthless, Your grammar and capabilities to write a coherent sentence is also a load of sh*t.

Who the **** wants to listen to Wlad and AJ suck each other off for a couple of hours? No thanks. Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

The fact you think Wlad wasn't a very good fighter ie. he wasnt, he was fairly good at a narrow skillset, but helpess outside that narrow set not what you'd call a very good fighter. no very good fighter is easily killed by noones repeatedly but he gets 11/10 for trying hard. the fact that you dont acknowledge that suggests me your opinion is worthless on this subject.

wlad wasnt "very good" even in his prime, stop lying. Max wasnt a shot fighter when he beat joe, or 2nd time, stop lying. The fact you think Wlad wasn't a very good fighter in his prime only shows how worthless your opinion really is. You're not capable of giving an unbiased take on events. Max had lost 4 of his last 5 fights with 3 of those defeats coming by way of KO. So yes, he was clearly shot. For you to think otherwise but claim Wlad was completely done by the time he fought Joshua also shows how detached from reality you really are. You're a nutter, that's very easy to see.

I haven't seen the documentary but, it was a great fight. Why not make extra money from it?

There's been loads of documentaries of fights like the Louis vs Shmelling rematch where Shmelling was shot in the first fight, and even more shot in the rematch. Didn't stop them doing documentaries about it though. If you think Moore was in a better place than Wlad was then there is no point in talking to you because bias and a lack of sense is something you're clearly riddled with. Moore was completely shot whereas Wlad was still very good. You don't put up those kind of performances unless you still have something to offer. Plus, Wlad was an actual Heavyweight, Moore wasn't. So stop talking crap. wlad wasnt "very good" even in his prime, stop lying. Max wasnt a shot fighter when he beat joe, or 2nd time, stop lying.

I heard a rumour Wladimir Klitschko lost to some other Brit one time, in a more relevant fight... Hell yeah... That fight was pure excitement compared to the Joshua fight... -insert sarcasm meme here- ...

its a poor excuse for a tv programme, the anniversary of a faceoff with a 40something man - jeezuz wept that is sad. In any other era, another prominent champ probably wouldnt bother showing up for the recording of it. Imagine how pathetic muhammad ali would feel in a programme for the anniversary of his demolition of Archie Moore, having just beat liston for the undisputed crown...and Moore was MUCH more significant that Wlad. on the other hand it had some legacy worth with wlad being the last long term champ, and unified briefly toward the end even, so thats something, even if unifying was really wlads undoing, he wasnt good enough to remain that for long without his brother around to avenge his losses. There's been loads of documentaries of fights like the Louis vs Shmelling rematch where Shmelling was shot in the first fight, and even more shot in the rematch. Didn't stop them doing documentaries about it though. If you think Moore was in a better place than Wlad was then there is no point in talking to you because bias and a lack of sense is something you're clearly riddled with. Moore was completely shot whereas Wlad was still very good. You don't put up those kind of performances unless you still have something to offer. Plus, Wlad was an actual Heavyweight, Moore wasn't. So stop talking crap.

Smart mother*ckers sound crazy only to dumb motherfu*kers. Oh, is that what you tell yourself in your little make-believe world? Answer the question. Why are they actors?

haha true, though I dont think a programme about fury would suit the BBC, they are trying to keep it squeaky clean these days. cant see theres much to be said between the two, other than a begrudging Guthrum-style "You're PEDs are stronger than mine" Explain the Guthrum/Æthelstan reference please.

I heard a rumour Wladimir Klitschko lost to some other Brit one time, in a more relevant fight... haha true, though I dont think a programme about fury would suit the BBC, they are trying to keep it squeaky clean these days. cant see theres much to be said between the two, other than a begrudging Guthrum-style "You're PEDs are stronger than mine"

its a poor excuse for a tv programme, the anniversary of a faceoff with a 40something man - jeezuz wept that is sad. In any other era, another prominent champ probably wouldnt bother showing up for the recording of it. Imagine how pathetic muhammad ali would feel in a programme for the anniversary of his demolition of Archie Moore, having just beat liston for the undisputed crown...and Moore was MUCH more significant that Wlad. on the other hand it had some legacy worth with wlad being the last long term champ, and unified briefly toward the end even, so thats something, even if unifying was really wlads undoing, he wasnt good enough to remain that for long without his brother around to avenge his losses.

For a brief moment I was terrified that Klitschko had come out of retirement and announced an AJ rematch

I heard a rumour Wladimir Klitschko lost to some other Brit one time, in a more relevant fight...

It's almost like Anthony Joshua has the market reach to be able for the BBC to make programs about him and gain good viewership from boxing fans andnnon boxing fans alike... Please let me know when a major US network makes a documentary of the groundbreaking.. record breaking fight that was wilder Vs Ortiz.

I know you're crazy and this question will probably be a waste of time but, why do you call them actors? Smart mother*ckers sound crazy only to dumb motherfu*kers.