If Golovkin beats Charlo, is it a better win than Murray, Macklin or Geale?

I'm pretty sure you claim regularly that Jacobs beat GGG despite GGG getting a Unaminous decision against Jacobs. Don't be a hypocrite. Bernard's two best wins at Middleweight were Oscar and Felix, two guys moving up in weight. Pretty sure you were also one of the posters trying to laugh off Bernard vs GGG resumes at middleweight (implying GGG isn't anywhere close). Meanwhile, Felix Sturm was robbed in that fight against Oscar, and Geale beat Felix, while Murray was arguably robbed against both Felix and Martinez. Anyways, I'd favor Jermall over all three, but I'm not even sure if he stops Murray. Groves, Abraham, and Sergio couldn't, Murray is a tank. I think Golovkin was the only professional boxer to ever knock him down (and stop him). never once have I said that

Who cares what other people say? As a fan, do you want to see the fight or not? I'd rather see GGG vs Charlo or BJS before any rematch with Canelo or Jacobs.

yes it's a better win. Jermall is better than those three. That's obvious just watching him in action. Murray is the best of those three but Jermall is better in my opinion. He is much better than Geale and Macklin. He has never lost a fight and never been knocked down.

If Golovkin beats Charlo people will just say it was another junior middleweight and things like "Who did he ever beat doe? K9 Bundrage!@!?!?!?!? Austin Trout? Who did Trout ever beat? An old shot former welterweight in Cotto? Plus the fight with Trout was close doe, he a bum doe." If Golovkin fights Derevyanchenko it will be "He only have 12 fights doe and his last fight was an 8 rounder against a guy with 22 losses doe. His best win is the same guy that Dominic Wade beat doe!!!!" Same goes for Andrade. His best win is the guy that Golovkin just kicked the crap out of and he's also a junior middleweight. You can do this with any fighter, basically. I don't know why you guys even make these threads. To troll each other?

Honestly, it would not be better. People are banking on the younger fighter to catch GGG at the right time, and later claim GGG had been overrated all along. Murray, Macklin and Geale actually proved their worth at the top level of the middleweight division. A Charlo win would quickly get discredited and eventually be lumped in with Brook and Martirosyan. By the way, I would love to see this fight (GGG vs Charlo)

Sturm didnt get the win..Hopkins showed how to handle a smaller fighter I'm pretty sure you claim regularly that Jacobs beat GGG despite GGG getting a Unaminous decision against Jacobs. Don't be a hypocrite. Bernard's two best wins at Middleweight were Oscar and Felix, two guys moving up in weight. Pretty sure you were also one of the posters trying to laugh off Bernard vs GGG resumes at middleweight (implying GGG isn't anywhere close). Meanwhile, Felix Sturm was robbed in that fight against Oscar, and Geale beat Felix, while Murray was arguably robbed against both Felix and Martinez. Anyways, I'd favor Jermall over all three, but I'm not even sure if he stops Murray. Groves, Abraham, and Sergio couldn't, Murray is a tank. I think Golovkin was the only professional boxer to ever knock him down (and stop him).

Yes...because when it's a fighter I like, he doesn't have to be proven...the eye test is fine. That tells me that charlo is better than those other guys.

If Charlo was white, you’d say he’s another bum. im kinda surprised he hasnt named him "fighter of the decade" yet.......

If Charlo was white, you’d say he’s another bum. Alt already race baiting.. -MEGA- BostonGuy TBear

terry, terry, terry golovkins critics dont have to downplay his opponens...golovkins own fans often do that before the fights anyway....they did it with jacobs and canelo...when they fought those guys were ducking him...they bashed and discredited them.....then they turned around and made them all world after golovkin beat one of them and drew with the other...lol that actually happened....we had to hear how jacobs was murdered by pirog and even went down against featherfists mora.....and how canelo was beaten by t his guy and that guy and was a scared chicken.....beaten by a featherfisted, past his prime, WW so before you go around acting like its golovkins critics that go around changing the stories.....his own fans do it just as much, if not more, than them the thing is...for the life of me....i cant remember any sane individual, who wasnt trolling golovkins fans, ever acting like one of his opponents was some world beater beforehand...cause besides jacobs and canelo there arent any good fighters on the resume a fight with charlo would probably earn golovkin some respect amongst his critics haha thats pretty funny. You should take that act over to the Improv or something......

I don't find KOing bums impressive, so really... neither tbh. Then why is Charlo considered a possible good win for Golovkin?

Oscar was up 4-5 zero with just a fawking jab I didn't see Oscar doing sh1t but getting countered. Not to mention he was buzzed by a much lighter Floyd

yes, because he's better and in his prime. simple. but mainly because he's better. way way better.

Which is more impressive with their kos? Charlo or Golovkin? I don't find KOing bums impressive, so really... neither tbh.

charlo has amazing skills so that puts him above everyone. if ggg were to somehow miraculously beat charlo that would cement him as an all time great No, it would not lol you friggen tool

charlo has amazing skills so that puts him above everyone. if ggg were to somehow miraculously beat charlo that would cement him as an all time great

You tried to down play any of his accomplishments when he had a big one Sturm didnt get the win..Hopkins showed how to handle a smaller fighter

I think Charlo is more dangerous than the fighters you named but if Golovkin beats him Im sure there would be people who would discredit it. He was a JMW and all that ol tired shit. Id rather see Golovkin vs Charlo next rather than Canelo. He beat Canelo pretty clearly to me, I dont need to see it again. Charlo will bring it to Golovkin, I believe he has that kind of confidence. It would be a much better fight, Canelo is gonna do the same ol shit.

Because I'm positive he knocks out all the other mentioned former golovkin opponents. He's up and coming with power at 160, and he does have skill. I'd still like to see him lose though. Which is more impressive with their kos? Charlo or Golovkin?

Can't agree there, Oscar landed next to nothing of significance and Floyd's speed, reflexes and overall ring IQ was just better. Oscar was up 4-5 zero with just a fawking jab